100 likes | 232 Views
How might the EU data protection framework change ?. Waltraut Kotschy Expert Workshop on Data Protection Podgorica, Febr. 7 2011. Why should it change ? (1). Ernormous changes since 1995 Technological developments Internet as a predominant way of communication Data mining
E N D
Howmightthe EU dataprotectionframeworkchange ? Waltraut Kotschy Expert Workshop on Data Protection Podgorica, Febr. 7 2011
Whyshoulditchange? (1) • Ernormouschangessince 1995 • Technological developments • Internet as a predominantwayofcommunication • Data mining • Cloudcomputing • etc • Globalisation: • Due totheinternet, „doingthings“ islessthaneverboundtobeingpresentat a specificlocation • Due totheinternet, informationcanbespreadeasilytothewholeworld • Abolition of „pillar“-structureofthe EU bytheLisbon Treaty • Coherencethroughout all matterssubjectto EU legislation - beyondcommonmarketmatters
Whyshoulditchange? (2) • New technologies do not alwaysmeetwitheffectivedataprotectiontools: • Howtogetridof personal information in the Internet ? • Howto find theresponsiblecontroller on theinternet ? • Who canguaranteedataprotection in a cloudcomputingenvironment? • Globalisationmayforthedatasubjectleadto a • lack oftransparencyastotheuseofdataand • difficultiestoenforcedataprotection • New structureofthe EU makesitpossibletofullyextenddataprotectionrulestoareasofpoliceandjustice • Reasonfor lack offullprotectionby EU-legislationisnolonger existent
Howshoulditchange ? • The Commission Paper COM(2010) 699 final, from Nov. 2010, makesseveralproposalsfor intensive discussion in publicduringthenextmonths
Onecomprehensive DP- framework • The applicabilityof a revised Data ProtectionDirectiveshouldbeextendedtomattersoftheformer „thirdpillar“ (policeandjustice) • Itshouldbefullyapplicable, thatis: not onlypertaintomattersoftransborder-cooperation, but to all activities, national and transnational, ofpoliceorjudicialauthorities
Enhancingrightsofdatasubjects • Applicabilitytotheformer „thirdpillar“- matterswouldautomaticallybefavourabletotherightsofdatasubjects; moreover • therightsofdatasubjectsneedtobeenhancedvis à visnewtechnologies, e.g. • „righttobeforgotten“ in theinternet • Mandatorydatabreachnotifications • Righttodataportability • Introducing „classaction“ tomakeenforcingrightseasierforthedatasubject
Additional „Internet-rules“? • The internetempowersthe individual bycompletelynewpossibilitiestomakeinformationpublic, evengloballypublic. Such power needsbalancing • The Directivedoes not applytoprocessingfor „personal andhouseholdactivities“ Socialnetworkshavebecome a phenomenonwithseriousdataprotectionimplications theDirectiveis, however, not applicable
Introducingsomenewprinciples • The Commissionpaperproposestointroduceseveralnewmandatoryprinciples: • dataminimisation • built in dataprotectionintonewprocessingsystems: „privacyby design“ • internaldataprotectionofficers • „Accountabilityprinciple“: stressingresponsibilityofcontrollers
Globalisingdataprotection • Goal: minimumstandardofprotectionfor personal datawherevertheyareprocessed • Means: • Working togetherwith international communitytoestablish universal principlesfordataprotection • Follow moreoftentheprincipleofreciprocity • Withinthe EU: • Further harmonizationoftheinterpretationandimplementationof EU rules • Revisetherules on international datatransfer • Developprocedureswitheffect in all 27 memberstates
Strengtheningenforcement • Revision of • Powers ofdataprotectionauthorities • Nature ofsanctions • Proceduresofsanctioning: • Introducecriminalsanctions • Stress joinedenforcementactionsbeyond national bordersorevencontinentaloutlines