1 / 26

Program evaluation

Program evaluation. Sebastian Uijtdehaage bas@mednet.ucla.edu 310.794.9009. Why do you evaluate?. Five reasons of evaluating. FORMATIVE informs program development SUMMATIVE demonstrate program’s success and impact UNDERSTANDING how and why did program work?

parley
Download Presentation

Program evaluation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Program evaluation Sebastian Uijtdehaage bas@mednet.ucla.edu 310.794.9009

  2. Why do you evaluate?

  3. Five reasons of evaluating • FORMATIVEinforms program development • SUMMATIVEdemonstrate program’s success and impact • UNDERSTANDINGhow and why did program work? • DISSEMINATIONsharing best practices • RECOGNITIONscholarship, academic credit, leadership Stufflebeam 2003

  4. What type of evaluation should I conduct?

  5. Outcome & ImpactDid it work?

  6. Dan Stufflebeam:CIPP Model of Program Evaluation CONTEXT INPUT PRODUCT PROCESS

  7. What type of evaluation should I conduct? Formative or Summative?

  8. formative & summative evaluation Stufflebeam 2003

  9. formative & summative evaluation Stufflebeam 2003

  10. What type of evaluation should I conduct? Quantitative or Qualitative?

  11. Quantitative or qualitative measures? Quantitative measures HOW MUCH…? • How much did the participant change? • How much did the community change? Qualitative measuresWHY and HOW? • Why did the program work? • How did participants change as result?

  12. What makes good evaluation?

  13. Evaluation must be planned ahead • Evaluation should be part of program planning • Planning and resource allocation makes evaluation more successful • Example: long-term tracking of participants

  14. Confidence being admitted in a medical school

  15. What else makes good evaluation? • Scientific rigor • Evaluation produces useful information that helps make decisions • Assessment should be done with a particular purpose in mind • Evaluation is tailored to your program objectives • Evaluation is done with conceptual framework in mind

  16. LOGIC MODEL CONDITIONS and DRIVERS The Planned Work The Intended Results

  17. LOGIC MODEL CONDITIONS and DRIVERS Current situation that precipitates the need for the program

  18. LOGIC MODEL CONDITIONS and DRIVERS Resources and inputs needed to operate the program:personnel, facilities, materials, equipment

  19. LOGIC MODEL CONDITIONS and DRIVERS Everything the program does if it had access to the resources

  20. LOGIC MODEL CONDITIONS and DRIVERS The “deliverables”—the events, products and services Number of participants, classes, brochures, advisors, etc

  21. LOGIC MODEL CONDITIONS and DRIVERS If the program delivers, the participants will benefit in certain ways: Knowledge, skills, behavior, attitudes Immediate, mid-term and long-term outcomes

  22. LOGIC MODEL CONDITIONS and DRIVERS If these benefits to participants are achieved, then certain changes in organizations and communities might be expected to occur

  23. LOGIC MODEL CONDITIONS and DRIVERS The Planned Work The Intended Results

  24. LOGIC MODEL • Links processes and outcomes: • Funders love this! • Great for program planning • Work backwards • Evaluation is built in! • Ain’t perfect

  25. Your turn…

More Related