1 / 13

Roadmap for a System Life Cycle Quality Framework on the basis of NATO AAP-48.

Roadmap for a System Life Cycle Quality Framework on the basis of NATO AAP-48. Andries v.d. Steeg Chairman NATO AC/327 Working Group on Quality. NATO Policy on System Life Cycle Management (SLCM)

pascal
Download Presentation

Roadmap for a System Life Cycle Quality Framework on the basis of NATO AAP-48.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Roadmap for a System Life Cycle Quality Framework on the basis of NATO AAP-48. Andries v.d. Steeg Chairman NATO AC/327 Working Group on Quality

  2. NATO Policy on System Life Cycle Management (SLCM) • The aim of SLCM is to optimize defense capabilities taking into account performance, cost, schedule, quality, operational environments, integrated logistic support and obsolescence over the life cycle of the system. • The defense capability depends to a great extent, on the quality of systems. Quality is best achieved through an integrated systems approach throughout the life cycle. (ref. to AQAP-2000)

  3. Major Task AC/327 WG on Quality: • Develop a roadmap for a System Life Cycle Quality Framework on the basis of NATO AAP-48. • Finalized 2009 (hopefully!)

  4. AAP-48 NATO System Life Cycle Stages and Processes • AAP-48 was approved by NATO end 2006 • AAP-48 defines the SLCM framework and provides guidance for implementing the SLCM Policy. It is based on the civil standard ISO/IEC 15288 (SE-System Life Cycle Processes) and provides for a common understanding of the principles and terminology of SLCM.

  5. Increasing level of detail System Life Cycle Management System Life Cycle Management Policy Policy PolicyImplementation Allied Administrative Procedure (AAP) 48 L i f e C y c l e S t a g e s Concept Development Production Utilization Support Retirement L i f e C y c l e P r o c e s s e s FrameworkDocuments (“enablers”) Project Management Framework (PAPS) Quality Framework System Engineering Framework Risk Management Framework ………

  6. Life Cycle Stages (time domain) Life CycleProcesses (function domain)

  7. AQAP - 2110 How to cover all Life Cycle Stages and Processes?

  8. Define for all stakeholders: • Acquirer • User • Owner • GQAR • Supplier • the quality activities appropriate to the life cycle stage and process!

  9. NATO Policy • Allied Administrative Publication AAP-48 • Allied Quality Assurance Publication AQAP-2000 • SLCM Quality Road Map Plan Quality Management Principles Through the Life cycle Act Do Organization Domain 3.2. Enterprise processes Check • Resource Domain • 2.3 Life cycle participants. 2.3.1 The user • 2.3.2 The acquirer • 2.3.3 The owner • 2.3.4 The supplier • 2.3.5 The personnel with responsibility for • GQA 3.2.1. Enterprise Environment Management Process 3.2.2. Investment Management Process 3.2.3. System Life Cycle Processes Management Process 3.2.4. Resource Management Process 3.2.5. Quality Management Process Time Domain Life Cycle Stages ACQUIRER SUPPLIER Process Product realization Output Input • Function Domain • Life Cycle Processes • Input, Output and Milestones • Methods, Tools and Attributes Tailoring to the life cycle, the product and the risks

  10. Where do we end?? • 1 System AQAP with all tailoring criteria? • AQAP’s related to a Life Cycle Stage? • AQAP’s with templates related to processes and products? • QA Roadmap covering all quality aspects mentioned above with reference to existing AQAP- 2000 series?

  11. Threats: • Acceptance by industry (depart from ISO!) • Tailoring too complicated (like AQAP-160!) • Therefore: • Include civil QA Standards (ISO/AS etc) as much as possible. • Develop pre-tailored templates to facilitate tailoring as much as possible.

  12. QA roadmap will result in (Opportunities): • Better control of Defence Acquisition programs by focussing at carefully selected processes and life cycle stages through the application of tailoring criteria defined by the QA roadmap. • More effective and efficient GQA by means of monitoring processes and output performance tailored to the complexity, life and risks of the defence acquisition program.

More Related