70 likes | 169 Views
Issue 2007-I075. Non-CSA CR sends MVO with bypass CSA Flag. Issue.
E N D
Issue 2007-I075 Non-CSA CR sends MVO with bypass CSA Flag
Issue • Non-CSA CR submits a MVO with the bypass CSA Flag, resulting in CSA CR never knowing the ESIID is not active. CSA premise management company is left with a Unit with no power and may incur charges for permits in the hundreds of Dollars.
Market Requirement Upon receipt of an 814_24 containing the REF~2W, ERCOT shall validate that the CR submitting the 814_24 is also the CR with an active CSA relationship. • If the CSA CR is different than the CR submitting the 814_24 MVO, ERCOT will ignore the REF~2W segment and will process as a MVO to CSA. • ERCOT will validate CSA CR based upon DUNS • Validation of DUNS on exact DUNS or (Option A) • Validation of DUNS based upon umbrella DUNS (Option B) ERCOT will not validate on the 814_24 Move Out (MVO) that includes a REF~1P~B44
ERCOT Analysis • Option A (Validation of DUNS on exact DUNS ) • Initial Estimate of 180 hours for Development and Testing • With the number of hours from the high level estimate, it was determined once the PRR or SCR would go through for approval, it would be worked in a project, and can not be worked as a SIR. • Option B (Validation of DUNS based upon umbrella DUNS) • Initial Estimate of 640 hours for Development and Testing • In addition, in order to allow for one log-in to access information across multiple DUNS, the parent / child relationship was not implemented in the current architecture and would require significant architecture changes (across multiple systems). • With the number of hours from the high level estimate, it was determined once the PRR or SCR would go through for approval, it would be worked in a project, and can not be worked as a SIR.
Next steps • Where do we go from here?