140 likes | 258 Views
WRF exercise 1. Kessler μ -physics scheme vs Thompson μ -physics scheme . Isaac Hankes Joseph Ching. Difference between Kessler and Thompson schemes. Kessler scheme: warm rain- no ice, idealized microphysics, time-split rainfall
E N D
WRF exercise 1 Kessler μ-physics scheme vs Thompson μ-physics scheme Isaac Hankes Joseph Ching
Difference between Kessler and Thompson schemes • Kessler scheme: warm rain- no ice, idealized microphysics, time-split rainfall • Thompson scheme: 6-class microphysics with graupel, ice and rain number conc. Predicted (double-moment ice), time-split fall terms • Kessler takes about 2.5 hours, Thompson takes about 5+ hours computer time for a 180-mins simulation.
Comparison (2): vorticity tendency • There are four terms in the vorticity tendency equation: tilting, divergence, solenoid and advection terms. Comparison is made among schemes, time, and height level.
Max. Vorticity Time Series (s-1) Thompson Kessler
3-D Max Vorticity Time Series Thompson Kessler
Vorticity Tendency Terms Kessler Thompson
Max Vorticity by Level Thompson Kessler
VorticityTendency: 1km (90min) **Kessler on left, Thompson on right for all contour plots**
Conclusions • Max vorticity peaks earlier in Kessler • Max vorticity generally higher vertically in Thompson • Advective term dominates for both, strongest at 10km • Right cell much more dominant in Thompson (more realistic) • Kessler storms move faster