180 likes | 300 Views
Committee on Refinery Equipment 2008 Spring Meeting Update Wendy Dominguez, Chair, CRE Member, General Committee on Special Programs. Purpose/Outcomes. Present 2008 update Report on the CRE metrics Update on the 2008 plans Presentation on Pressure Integrity KPI Project
E N D
Committee on Refinery Equipment 2008 Spring Meeting Update Wendy Dominguez, Chair, CRE Member, General Committee on Special Programs
Purpose/Outcomes • Present 2008 update • Report on the CRE metrics • Update on the 2008 plans • Presentation on Pressure Integrity KPI Project • Ensure CRE alignment with GCR Priorities
CRE Metrics • In 2006 the CRE reinstituted the CRE Metrics program • The metrics measure the program’s viability and progress towards goals • The CRE provided an initial report to the GCR at the Spring 2006 meeting and now reports results annually • The results are included in the appendix and have shown improving performance
2008 Activities • The CRE subcommittees plan to ballot and publish 18 standards/RP’s in 2008 • The standards will cover equipment types: • Storage Tanks, Heat Exchangers, Valves • Inspection, Mechanical and Electrical Equipment • Corrosion & Materials, Instruments and Controls, Pressure Relieving Systems • Included is an update to RP 521 on pressure relieving systems in response to the CSB recommendations
2008 Activities • Update on the Materials Database Project: • The Corrosion and Materials Subcommittee Officers held several interim teleconferences to develop the list of data needs • The Principal Investigator and Contractor are working with the Subcommittee Officers to develop a “prototype” data project • The GCR will be kept appraised of this project’s progress
Pressure Integrity KPI Project • Development of key process safety performance indicators program is API 2008 priority goal • Subcommittee on Inspection has expanded its existing pressure equipment integrity survey in support of this goal • Survey instrument was constructed and analysis will be completed by API Statistics Department, information will be blinded and used by participants for benchmarking
Pressure Integrity KPI Project • Survey will cover 29 topics in five key areas, full list included with pre-read materials: • Inspection Staffing • Costs Aspects • Advanced Program Management • Program Performance – Practice • Program Performance - Impacts • Similar to 2003 survey
Pressure Integrity KPI Project • Work will not duplicate previously approved API Safety & Fire Protection Subcommittee “Lagging” process safety indicators project • Benefits include: • Support of priority API goal • Internal benchmarking • Industry standard inspection practices
Pressure Integrity KPI Project • Outstanding issues include: • Publication of facility specific data – handled through blinding • Publication of industry data – meaningful summary must be made available to non-participating companies • CRE discussed at April 13 meeting • CRE seeks GCR comment and guidance
Conclusions • The CRE is committed to optimally managing the refining standards program • The CRE seeks comments and guidance on the Pressure Integrity KPI Project • Questions and comments?
CRE Metrics • Approved CRE metrics: • Average development time for new & revised standards and total resource requirements • New standards initiated per year by subcommittee • Standards older than five years/withdrawn standards • “Technical Inquiry” Log • Report of published and co-branded standards • Business impacts of published standards
CRE Metrics • Development Time Results: • 2005 average development time for new & revised standards and total resource requirements • Avg. time/resource requirement for 1st edition – 33 months and 50 participants (2 standards) • Avg. time resource requirement for revised editions – 41 months and 47 participants (6 standards) • 2006 average development time for new & revised standards and total resource requirements • Avg. time/resource requirement for 1st edition – 36 months and 27 participants (3 standards) • Avg. time resource requirement for revised editions – 27 months and 26 participants (9 standards) • 2007 average development time for new & revised standards and total resource requirements • Avg. time/resource requirement for 1st edition – 36 months and 10 participants (1 standard) • Avg. time resource requirement for revised editions – 28 months and 23 participants (13 standards)
CRE Metrics • New Standards Results: • 2005 New standards initiated per year by subcommittee • 1 in 2005 by the SC on Corrosion and Materials • 2006 New standards initiated per year by subcommittee • 3 in 2006, 1 by the SC on Aboveground Storage Tanks to address LNG, 2 by the SC on Heat Transfer Equipment to address hair-pin and spiral plate exchangers • 2007 New standards initiated per year by subcommittee • 6 in 2007, 2 by the SC on Heat Transfer Equipment, 2 by the SC on Inspection, and 1 each for Aboveground Storage Tanks and SC on Piping and Valves
CRE Metrics • Older than Five Years/Withdrawn Standards Results: • 2005 Standards older than five years/withdrawn standards • 3 standards older than five years on average for 9 subcommittees, 4 withdrawn standards • 2006 Standards older than five years/withdrawn standards • 3 standards older than five years on average for 9 subcommittees, no withdrawn standards • 2007 Standards older than five years/withdrawn standards • 3 standards older than five years on average for 9 subcommittees, no withdrawn standards
CRE Metrics • Technical Inquiry Results: • 2005 “Technical Inquiry” Log • 8 technical inquiries received on average by each subcommittee, with 2 closed out • Load varies greatly by subcommittee, from zero to twenty-nine inquiries • 2006 “Technical Inquiry” Log • 10 technical inquiries received on average by each subcommittee, with 6 closed out • Load varies greatly by subcommittee, from zero to twenty-seven inquiries • 2007 “Technical Inquiry” Log • 8 technical inquiries received on average by each subcommittee, with 6 closed out • Load varies greatly by subcommittee, from zero to twenty-six inquiries
CRE Metrics • Published and Co-branded Results: • 2005 Report of published and co-branded standards • Final count for 2005 off-press report was 8 standards, with 2 co-branded with ISO (two valve standards, 602 and 607) • 2006 Report of published and co-branded standards • Final count for 2006 off-press report was 12 standards, with 4 co-branded with ISO – three heat transfer standards (661 and 662 parts 1 and 2) and one mechanical equipment standard (612) • 2007 Report of published and co-branded standards • Final count for 2005 off-press report was 14 standards, with 7 co-branded with ISO and ASME – covering heat transfer equipment, inspection practices, and mechanical equipment
CRE Metrics • Business Impacts: Business impacts of published standards Business impacts difficult to measure directly – some examples: • 622, “Type Testing of Process Valve Packing for Fugitive Emissions”, 1st edition assists companies in environmental controls • 570, “Piping Inspection Code”, Addendum 4 to the 10th edition allows for use of composite materials for temporary piping repairs in liu of fabricated and bolted clamps • 939-D, “Stress Corrosion Cracking”, 2nd edition which assists industry in mitigating this form of corrosion