160 likes | 173 Views
This study by E. Ladygin focuses on calibration signals at CERN using Tower Driver for HEC modules, measuring delays, signal saturation, noise, and autocorrelation. Findings highlight delay disparities, saturated signal presence, and noise analysis.
E N D
Tower Driver CERN scope measurement March ‘05 E.Ladygin
Points of measurement HEC quadrant structure E.Ladygin
Signal waveforms : towers – A6,A7,A8,A9 E.Ladygin
Signal saturation E.Ladygin
TDB output noise waveform E.Ladygin
Noise autocorrelation function E.Ladygin
Summed signal E.Ladygin
Conclusion 1 • Calibration signal waveforms should be computed for the time constants and amplification and compared with expected signals E.Ladygin
Conclusion 2 • Calibration delay time distribution has been measured • Maximal difference between delays in a module is about 17ns • Maximal difference between delays in a longitudinal segment is about 9ns (~1.8m) E.Ladygin
Conclusion 3 • Saturated signal has been measured • No surprise E.Ladygin
Conclusion 4 • Noise has been measured – here is seen the big digital pickup noise, mainly 40MHz • Where is from? FEB? Trigger system by the cable to the oscilloscope? E.Ladygin
Conclusion 5 • Has been found that the numbering of mixer channels is not the same on both side of FEB, there is mirror sequence • J.Ban promised that every mixer can be programmed separately • We need a cable check program for trigger chain E.Ladygin
Thank you E.Ladygin