1 / 6

5 Categorical Syllogisms

5 Categorical Syllogisms. 5.4 Reducing the Number of Terms. Reducing the Number of Terms. This section is really just about using Conversion, Obversion, and Contraposition to get arguments into standard form. Let’s review what these operations work on: Conversion (E and I)

patriciagraham
Download Presentation

5 Categorical Syllogisms

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 5 Categorical Syllogisms 5.4 Reducing the Number of Terms

  2. Reducing the Number of Terms This section is really just about using Conversion, Obversion, and Contraposition to get arguments into standard form. Let’s review what these operations work on: Conversion (E and I) Obversion (A, E, I, and O) Contraposition (A and O)

  3. Reducing the Number of Terms All P are non-W Some E are W Some non-P are not non-E How many terms are there? ____ How many can there be in a Standard Form Categorical Syllogism? ____ How can we fix the argument? ____

  4. Reducing the Number of Terms On premise one, what operation will result in a logically equivalent form, while reducing the number of terms in the argument?

  5. Reducing the Number of Terms All P are non-W --- obversion ---> No P are W Cool. How about the conclusion, Some non-P are not non-E ? What would get rid of the complexity?

  6. Reducing the Number of Terms Some non-P are not non-E --- Contraposition ---> Some E are not P So, putting the argument back together, All P are non-W Some E are W Some non-P are not non-E Obversion  Contraposition  No P are W Some E are W Some E are not P Test this argument using Venn or 5 Rules

More Related