1 / 14

Update on the Leicester lab studies (WP2.2: CRDS Measurements)

Update on the Leicester lab studies (WP2.2: CRDS Measurements). Matthew Dover & Stephen Ball (University of Leicester). CAVIAR science meeting, Imperial College, 16 th December 2008. Leicester’s CAVIAR postdoc appointed!. Appointment – 22 September 2008

patsy
Download Presentation

Update on the Leicester lab studies (WP2.2: CRDS Measurements)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Update on the Leicester lab studies(WP2.2: CRDS Measurements) Matthew Dover & Stephen Ball (University of Leicester) CAVIAR science meeting, Imperial College, 16th December 2008

  2. Leicester’s CAVIAR postdoc appointed! • Appointment – 22 September 2008 • My background – PhD high resolution LIF spectroscopy of transient silicon containing species • Used the same vacuum system as CAVIAR pulsed nozzle experiments • Training since appointment – have carried out my first BBCEAS experiments using the field instrument • Last few weeks first BBCEAS experiments using vacuum chamber

  3. Target: OHb stretching overtones of water dimer • Positive identification of WD absorption features • In regions away from strong WM absorptions BBCEAS study, of the third, fourth and fifth water dimer OHb-stretching overtone transitions • Supersonic expansion: • Non-equilibrium concentrations of WM and WD • Collapse WM structure • Initial experiments are under way with an aim to examining the Dn = 5 at 622 nm (orange/red region) Dn Predicted (H2O)2 overtones Dn = 3 at 960 nm a Dn = 4 at 755 nm a Dn = 5 at 622 nm b aSchofield et al. 2007 bKjaergaard 2003

  4. Current experiments: Why orange wavelengths? Spectrum recorded by Simon Neil using field instrument • Visible light makes cavity alignment easier than infrared • Cavity mirrors already well characterised, and have good reflectivity (next slide) • Bright LED, peak emission at 617 nm (nearly gaussian emission spectrum) • The Dn = 5 water dimer overtone feature is predicted to be at ~622 nm – between WM lines (see above) • Consistent with Cambridge’s BBCRDS search for 615 nm (and 760 nm) dimer bands Kjaergaard predicts WD feature

  5. Current experiments: Why orange wavelengths? • High reflectivity of mirrors around WD feature (R(λ)~0.99987) means that a very high effective path length should be achievable (~7800 passes) LED emission FWHM = 35 nm

  6. Pulsed nozzle apparatus: developments Nozzle Spectrograph/CCD camera LED • Adjustable bellows mounts for cavity mirrors • Pumping system; pulsed nozzle (continuous nozzle???) • Leak tested down to 1107 Torr • Aligned first BBCEAS cavity and taken some preliminary measurements

  7. New Spectrometer: PI Acton SpectraPro 2500i • Very sensitive instrument as a cooled ICCD camera is used for light collection • Particularly attractive for pulsed nozzle experiments because of fast gating electronics supplied

  8. Fibre coupler for new spectrometer • Manufacturer supplied fibre f-matcher not ideal for BBCEAS. Therefore built our own • It was essential to design and engineer a suitable fibre coupler for the system • The fibre coupler was designed so as to give maximum throughput of light into the spectrometer by using a fast achromat to focus the light into the monochromator slit • Fibre is mounted on an x,y,z translator to allow optimal focus and positioning of fibre relative to monochromator entrance slit

  9. First vacuum experiments • H2O in N2 through pulsed nozzle • Gated detection on ICCD camera • This is a VERY preliminary result with much scope to improve when compared to the previous result obtained from the field instrument…

  10. Vacuum instrument vs field instrument • PI Acton • Pulsed nozzle • Chromex/Wright • H2O in N2 atmospheric pressure

  11. PI Acton vs Chromex/Wright spectrometer • PI Acton [NO2]= ~48 ppbv • Chromex/Wright [NO2]= ~57 ppbv

  12. Conclusion from first vacuum experiment • Although the PI Acton spectrometer allows gating type experiments, the noise levels and signal strengths do not look very promising: • Broader lineshape • Narrower bandwidth • Noisier! • Revert back to Chromex/Wright spectrometer – issue of gating experiment suitably to record spectra using a pulsed setup • Investigate possibility of a continuous source for the nozzle…

  13. Future developments: nozzle design • Probably the most important part of the overall system design • Good arguments for pulsed system and continuous system

  14. Timetable for work

More Related