1 / 10

Social Reaction Theories of Crime

Social Reaction Theories of Crime. Chapter 9. Social Reaction Theories of Crime. Focus upon social and institutional responses to the individual. View the individual as a largely passive being who is forced into the role of a criminal by societal definitions or by the reactions of others.

paul
Download Presentation

Social Reaction Theories of Crime

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Social Reaction Theories of Crime Chapter 9

  2. Social Reaction Theories of Crime • Focus upon social and institutional responses to the individual. • View the individual as a largely passive being who is forced into the role of a criminal by societal definitions or by the reactions of others. • The Labeling Perspective • Critical Criminology

  3. Labeling Theory • Has its foundation in the works of George Herbert Meade and Charles Horton Cooley. • Cooley is best known for his development of the “looking-glass self.” • The dynamic interplay between the individual and others leads to the development of a self-concept that affects subsequent behavior. • A formal response from the criminal justice system forces the individual to reassess his or her personal identity.

  4. Labeling Theory, cont. • Of primary importance to labeling theorists is what transpires after an act, not what caused or precipitated the act. • Second, deviance is not something inherent in the act. • Third, the labeling of an individual is a process of symbolic interaction between the “deviant” and significant others. • Lemert referred to this a secondary deviance. • Fourth, the labeling process is affected by who does the labeling and by how the labeled person reacts to the label. • Fifth, the act of labeling may lead to retrospective interpretation of the individual’s prior behavior. • Sixth, a deviant label such as that of “criminal” or “drug abuser” becomes the pivotal (master) status that overrides other personal attributes. - becker • Consequently, the probability of further criminal behavior is enhanced.

  5. Labeling Theories • Frank Tannenbaum - Dramatization of Evil • Wrote Crime and the Community (1938). • Contended that criminals are not inherently different from the rest of the population, but that specific acts in a person’s overall repertoire of behaviors are singled out and brought to public attention. • Dramatization of evil – social reaction whereby the individuals act now causes all of his acts to be looked at w/ suspicion. Gradual shift from behavior labeled deviant to the person being labeled as deviant. • Legal relativism - acts are neither inherently good nor evil. – your social status or the situation dictates how society responds to the same actions by different people (male w/ female, female w/ male) • Edwin M. Lemert - Primary and Secondary Deviance • Primary deviance - occasional or situational behavior that may be excused or rationalized by the actor and/or the social audience. • Secondary deviance - the result of a dynamic interaction between the individual’s deviation and the societal response to the deviation.

  6. Edwin M. Schur -Radical Nonintervention • Wrote Radical Nonintervention ( 1973) • Argued that society should take a more tolerant stance and allow adolescents to experiment with a wide array of behavioral alternatives. • Argued that being labeled “delinquent” is a master status and hard to overcome. • Retrospective interpretation - the process by which people reinterpret an individual’s behavior in light of new information concerning that individual.

  7. Critical Criminology • Karl Marx (1818-1883) - Conflict Theory • Argued that the economic base shaped all social arrangements. • The division of labor led to the alienation of workers. • Two opposing groups - • Bourgeoisie • Proletariat • Lumpen proletariate – fringe, do nothing, live off labor of others • Surplus value – root of the problem • Lumpen proletariate – fringe, do nothing, live off labor of others • Group Conflict Perspective • George Vold - Group Conflict Theory • Viewed humans as group oriented and society as a collection of groups, each with its own interests.

  8. The Radical Era - 1960s-1970s • Austin Turk - Crime and the Legal Order • Richard Quinney - The Social Reality of Crime • William Chambliss and Robert Seidman - Law, Order, and Power • Contemporary Critical Thought • Left Realism - based on the following four premises: • Street crime is a serious problem for the working class. • Working-class crime is primarily perpetrated against other members of the working class. • It is relative poverty, not absolute poverty, that breeds discontent, and this discontent without a political solution creates crime. • Crime can be reduced through implementation of practical, socialist policies.

  9. Contemporary Critical Thought, cont. • Feminism - Three major variations • Radical feminism - identifies a patriarchal social order in which men dominate women as the fundamental issue. • Marxist feminism - sees women as dominated by men as a result of the disproportionate location of economic power among men. • Socialist feminism - sees capitalism as inevitably flawed, producing a range of oppression, including that experienced by women. • Post-modernism - rejects the notion that rationalism and science merit a superior position in explaining the way things are.

  10. Conflict Theory Research on Conflict Theory Policy Relevance of Conflict Theory

More Related