Military Contribution to Unified Action

1. Military ContributiontoUnified Action United States Joint Forces Command

2. Joint Concept Development & Experimentation (JCDE) in Support of Unified Action Establishing Concept Development and Experimentation Environment � a rapidly growing, inclusive shaping instrument Promoting conceptual convergence in areas of diplomacy, development and defense � achieving effects on the ground Developing capabilities (products) to enable coalition (military & non-military) action Accelerating US and multinational concept development through shared insights Creating a new lexicon, new partners, shared concepts and convergent interests

4. Unified Action Engagement Cycle

5. Unified Action Concept 3-year umbrella program w/ 8 imbedded projects Export experimentation � manage the process and products Work the gaps . . . Security Economic stabilization Justice & reconciliation Humanitarian assistance & social well-being Governance & participation Crosswalk with Joint Operational Concepts & Joint Integrating Concepts Concurrently develop the enablers . . . Integrated planning and implementation Application technology Training & Education Support implementation of national & departmental policy Assess �whole of government� solution set Unified Action 07 Multinational Experiment 05 Deliver actionable recommendations

6. Military Support to Unified Action J9 FOCUSED EXPERIMENTATION PLAN FOR RULE OF LAW & SECURITY SECTOR REFORM Michelle Hughes, Esq. J9 Interagency Group 4 January 2006

7. Scope of ROL/SSR Rule of Law and Security Sector Reform are critical focus areas within the larger framework of Unified Action Rule of Law � Underpins and Enables most other Essential Tasks Policing Governance (incl. civil & criminal justice, capacity building, economic governance, accountability and oversight) Prisons Security Sector Reform � A Whole-of-Government Institutional Approach to Transformation for sustainable security and stabilization Police Military Intelligence Judiciary Accountability and Oversight

8. Rule of Law/Security Sector Reform Direct Application to Military Support to Unified Action Red: Lead Blue: Supporting/enabling

9. JFCOM�s Unique Contribution Phased, progressive events that go beyond just talking about the problem (BOGSATs) -- that actually address critical gap issues in operational planning and execution to: Develop combined operational warfighting concepts and integrating multinational and interagency warfighting transformation efforts with joint CDE in coordination with the other combatant commands (UCP 04). Delineate military v. civilian roles and responsibilities for Rule of Law and Security Sector Reform during pre-conflict, major combat operations, and all phases of stabilization and reconstruction Explore the operational application of emerging capabilities Develop interagency solutions to fill existing capabilities gaps Compete ideas and concepts in Joint Futures Lab, War Games and Experimentation

10. What is a �Gap Issue?� A capability that does not currently exist in either the military or civilian community An emerging capability for which there exists no practical framework or authority for integration into joint operations A capability or role that military units are currently performing on-the-ground out of necessity, but for which they are under-trained, under-resourced, and/or are not legally empowered

11. ROL/SSR Gap Issues Policing Capabilities Use and Integration of Stability Police Human Rights/Accountability of the Former Regime Economic Governance: Commercial Law, Economic Controls, and Civil Justice Crime, Corruption, and Illicit Power Structures Disarmament, Demobilization, and Reintegration (DDR) Integrated Legal Strategy Military v. Civilian Roles and Responsibilities in Rule of Law Phasing of issues was chosen based on opportunity, and to facilitate integration with related interagency and coalition priorities and initiatives. 1. Policing Capabilities is number 1 because it represents the single most critically misunderstood capability, and has a direct resource and mission impact on ground forces. 2. Stability Policing is #2 in order to build upon the work being done in Europe with the establishment of an EU Gendarmerie, and the Italian center for stability policing. The Human Rights �thread� is designed to run through all events and discussions Economic Governance is a priority gap for our civilian interagency partners, and currently-scheduled JFCOM events offer rich scenarios for exploring roles and responsibilities Crime, Corruption and Illicit Power Structures is a priority gap for our civilian interagency partners and currently-scheduled JFCOM events offer rich scenarios for exploring roles and responsibilities. It is also a significant gap for military forces in operations of the last 14 years. DDR is Phase II because more time is needed to develop the operational level issues, and to take advantage of S/CRS-directed work being done at the strategic level that will not be complete until mid-2006 Roles and Responsibilities and Legal Strategy will incorporate and consolidate work done on the more specific areas listed above. Phasing of issues was chosen based on opportunity, and to facilitate integration with related interagency and coalition priorities and initiatives. 1. Policing Capabilities is number 1 because it represents the single most critically misunderstood capability, and has a direct resource and mission impact on ground forces. 2. Stability Policing is #2 in order to build upon the work being done in Europe with the establishment of an EU Gendarmerie, and the Italian center for stability policing. The Human Rights �thread� is designed to run through all events and discussions Economic Governance is a priority gap for our civilian interagency partners, and currently-scheduled JFCOM events offer rich scenarios for exploring roles and responsibilities Crime, Corruption and Illicit Power Structures is a priority gap for our civilian interagency partners and currently-scheduled JFCOM events offer rich scenarios for exploring roles and responsibilities. It is also a significant gap for military forces in operations of the last 14 years. DDR is Phase II because more time is needed to develop the operational level issues, and to take advantage of S/CRS-directed work being done at the strategic level that will not be complete until mid-2006 Roles and Responsibilities and Legal Strategy will incorporate and consolidate work done on the more specific areas listed above.

12. Way Ahead Three step approach: Develop discreet analytic issues for war gaming and experimentation within different scenarios and contexts Refine and export results to SJFHQ, COCOMs and interagency partners for further use and experimentation Consolidate experience in white papers, joint integrating concepts and operating concepts

13. Way Ahead (cont.) 1st qtr FY 06 � 3rd qtr FY 06 Leverage MNE4 and UQ 06 event cycles to develop Policing Capabilities; Stability Policing; Economic Governance; Crime, Corruption and Illicit Power Structures 30 Nov -1 Dec 05: Illicit Power Structures Seminar 5-7 Dec 05: Stability Policing Workshop Run a human rights/accountability thread through each event and within each functional area Begin development of Operational-level DDR issues in coordination with S/CRS strategic planning framework development Develop coalition concept development partnerships 10-11 May 06: Policing Capabilities Workshop Develop COCOM partnerships

14. Way Ahead (cont.) 4th qtr FY 06 � 2st qtr FY 07 Workshops on Roles and Responsibilities and Legal Strategy as spiral events for Interagency Unified Action War Game 3rd qtr FY 07 � 4th qtr FY 07 Exercise all eight gap issues in Interagency Unified Action War Game, leveraging lessons learned from prior experimentation

15. Back-Up Slides

16. Policing Capabilities Purpose: To bring the military and civilian communities together to explore the full extent of capabilities, incl. border and customs control, organized crime and complex investigations, civil disorder response, and general law enforcement; their effect on coalition operations; processes for planning, coordination and integration in pre- and post-conflict stabilization. Co-Sponsors: State-INL; PKSOI Principal Coalition Partners: Key Participants: Military and government agencies, think tanks and academia: Coalition Partners; COCOMs; Services; OSD/SOLIC; Department of State -- S/CRS and INL; USAID; DOJ; Treasury; USIP; UN, COESPU, NATO, Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE). Products: J9 Joint Integrating Concepts for integration of civilian policing capabilities in coalition operational planning and execution. Intelligence requirements framework for interagency assessment and planning. Upcoming Experimentation Venues: Unified Action; Unified Quest; MNE4; MNE5

17. Stability Policing Purpose: To explore the ability of the international community to provide stability policing functions; the effects on coalition operations; processes for planning, coordination, and employment. Co-Sponsors: USIP; PKSOI Principal Coalition Partners: Key Participants: Military and government agencies, think tanks and academia: Coalition Partners; COCOMs; Services; OSD/SOLIC; Department of State -- S/CRS and INL; USAID; DOJ; Treasury; USIP; UN, COESPU, NATO, Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) Products: J9 Integrating Concept for utilization of multinational stability policing capabilities in coalition operations. Intelligence requirements framework for interagency assessment and planning Upcoming Experimentation Venues: Unified Action; Unified Quest; MNE4; MNE5

18. Disarmament, Demobilization, and Reintegration (DDR) Purpose: To delineate roles and responsibilities for DDR of indigenous security forces between military and emerging coordinated civilian capabilities, integration of the missions of each enabling sector, and sequencing of capacity and performance Co-Sponsors: S/CRS; USAID Principal Coalition Partners: Key Participants: Military and civilian government agencies including: Coalition Partners; COCOMs, USMC; USA; USAF; USN; Department of State -- S/CRS, DRL, and INL; USAID; Department of Labor (DOL), DOJ; Treasury; USIP; UN. Product: J9 Concept Paper for DDR that can be integrated into all Joint Experimentation and will provide basis for further limited objective experiments within JFL. Intelligence requirements framework for interagency assessment and planning

19. Human Rights and Regime Accountability Purpose: To address how stabilization forces address accountability of members of the former and current regime for human rights violations and other crimes they may commit or have committed against their own people; and the tools or jurisdictional mechanisms stabilization may be able to use to ensure compliance with international norms and standards. Co-Sponsors: State-INL; USAID Principal Coalition Partners: Key Participants: Representatives from military, other government agencies, think tanks, academia, and the NGO community including: Coalition Partners; COCOMs; NDU; Services; Department of State -- S/CRS, Trafficking in Persons (TIP), INL, DRL, IO, PM; USAID; DOJ-Criminal Div and US Attorney�s Office; USIP; UN, HHS; InterAction (selected members). Product: Joint Integrating Concept for addressing regime accountability in coalition operational planning and execution. Intelligence requirements framework for interagency assessment and planning.

20. Economic Governance: Role of Commercial Law, Economic Control, and Civil Justice Purpose: To delve into the appropriate roles and responsibilities of military forces in the commercial and economic aspects of enforcing or implementing rule of law in post-conflict stabilization and pre-conflict theater security cooperation. Also leverages work done on Crime, Corruption, and Illicit Power Structures Co-Sponsors: S/CRS; SOCOM (Civil Affairs) Principal Coalition Partners: Participants: Representatives from military and other government agencies including: Coalition Partners; COCOMs, Services; Department of State -- S/CRS; USAID; DOJ; Treasury; Commerce; US Chamber of Commerce; DOL ; Department of Energy (DOE) ; USIP; UN; IFIs. Products: J9 integrating concept for coordination and guidance on the roles and responsibilities of military forces in facilitating post-conflict economic recovery and assistance within operational planning and execution of stabilization and reconstruction operations. Intelligence requirements framework for interagency assessment and planning Upcoming Experimentation Venues: Unified Action; Unified Quest; MNE4; MNE5

21. Crime, Corruption, and Illicit Power Structures Purpose: To explore the impact of crime, to include transnational crime corruption, and illicit power structures on stability operations, and the corresponding responsibilities and capabilities of US and coalition military forces in prevention and policing Co-Sponsors: State-INL; USAID; USIP Principal Coalition Partners: Key Participants: Military and civilian government agencies including: Coalition Partners; COCOMs; Services; Department of State -- S/CRS and INL; USAID; DOJ; Treasury; USIP; Products: J9 concept paper for integration of interagency anti-crime, corruption, and illicit network operations into coalition operational planning and execution; Intelligence requirements framework for interagency assessment and planning; Interagency taxonomy for illicit and informal power structures Experimentation Venues: MNE4; Unified Quest; Unified Resolve

22. Legal Strategy Framework Purpose: To develop a planning framework for an integrated legal strategy that guides coalition military and civilian agencies in the performance of stabilization and reconstructions tasks Co-Sponsors: S/CRS; Principal Coalition Partners: Key Participants: Military and civilian government agencies including: Coalition Partners; COCOMs; Services; USA-SJA/CLAMO; NDU; Department of State -- S/CRS, Office of the Legal Advisor (L), and INL; USAID; DOJ; Treasury; Commerce; Defense Institute of International Legal Studies (DIILS) Products: J9 concept paper for integration of an interagency legal strategy into coalition operational planning and execution; Intelligence requirements framework for interagency assessment and planning Experimentation Venues: MNE5; Unified Action

23. Roles and Responsibilities Purpose: To explore, in conjunction with the NGO and IO communities, the appropriate roles and responsibilities of military forces in the establishment and maintenance of governance. Format: Two � day seminar Participants: Representatives from military, other government agencies, IOs and NGOs including: Coalition Partners; Services; COCOMs; DIILS; Department of State -- S/CRS, L, and INL; USAID; DOJ; Treasury; USIP; InterAction. Recommended Co-sponsors: USA Civil Affairs School; USAID Principal Coalition Partners: Products: White Papers; J9 Joint Integrating Concept for military support to Rule of Law Unified Action; Intelligence requirements framework for interagency assessment and planning Experimentation Venues: Feeds all event threads