170 likes | 369 Views
Agenda. MAWG OverviewPurpose/StructureMission Assurance Capability RequirementsClose ApproachEMI/RFI EngagementSpace Situational Awareness PanelEMI/RFI Mitigation Panel Flight Dynamics Task Force SidebarJSMPS Demos8 Dec 06 Classified Session
E N D
2. Agenda MAWG Overview
Purpose/Structure
Mission Assurance Capability Requirements
Close Approach
EMI/RFI Engagement
Space Situational Awareness Panel
EMI/RFI Mitigation Panel
Flight Dynamics Task Force Sidebar
JSMPS Demos
8 Dec 06 Classified Session By Invite
NSSO Waples Mill Facility
3. Working Group Objectives To provide an on-going forum for DoD and the commercial satellite communications (SATCOM) industry to discuss potential improvements to policies, programs and processes for enhanced mission assurance of SATCOM services used in support of the Department of Defense and U.S. national security interests.
4. Working Group Oversight Principals
Co-chaired by
USecAF/DoD Executive Agent for Space (Dr. Sega)
Commander, U.S. Strategic Command (Gen Cartwright)
Includes key senior civilian and joint military SATCOM leaders
Receives annual updates in joint meetings with industry CEOs
Senior Steering Group (SSG)
Co-chaired by
Director, NSSO (Maj Gen Armor)
Director, Global Ops, USSTRATCOM (RADM Williams)
Senior service SATCOM leads serve as advisory members
Reviews working group progress and results on a periodic basis
5. Working Group Structure Government membership
Senior staff and action officers from SSG organizations
Military services, defense agencies and other federal agencies may fully participate in deliberations
Industry participation
Government presentations open to all industry representatives with appropriate clearances
Consultations with sub-groups and individual firms as required on specific issues
6. Working Group Issues Neighborhood Watch
Periodic Threat Updates
Exchange of Architecture/Planning Info
Cooperation on Close Approach/Conjunction Events
Interference Detection and Mitigation
DISA Modification of DSTS-G Contracts (Mission Assurance Portions)
Other activities
Analysis of commercial elements of Transformation Communications Architecture v3.0
Participation in Schriever IV game
7. Spacecraft Close Approaches Problem: Close approaches between DoD and other satellites is an increasing concern
Over 300 satellites in Geo belt; ~2 3 new coml launches per month
Problem: DoD Conjunction mitigation procedures did not include interfaces to industry
Lack of ability to contact non-DoD spacecraft operators
Procedures not explained, nor tested with industry
CFE program not adequate for emergency needs
Solutions Underway
Commercial SATCOM Phonebook (Version 1 Fielded)
Internal DoD Procedures now include interface to industry
Informal contact procedures
Clearances for key industry personnel
Secure means/methods of communication
8. EMI/RFI Engagement Problem: Purposeful and inadvertent EMI/RFI remains a significant and growing issue for DoD and industry
Increasing number of SATCOM users and EMI/RFI events
Separating wheat from chaff requires close interfaces
Solutions Underway
Shared threat situational awareness with cleared industry
Formalize requirements and procedures via contracts
Planning and execution of exercises
Shared engagement strategies with industry
Need increased, persistent emphasis on:
Rapid, effective detection, reporting, and characterization
Prevention
9. Key Mission Assurance Capabilities Protection Floors
Operations Security Clearances -- U.S. SECRET (or higher) clearances for staff having access to OPSEC sensitive data
Satellite Operations Clearances -- Staff with U.S. or allied SECRET clearances who can effect satellite operations available at all hours
Information Assurance -- Command uplink encryption compliant with DoD Directive 8581.1E
Electromagnetic Interference/Radio Frequency Interference Geolocation
Access to EMI/RFI geolocation capability (organic or contracted service)
Best efforts made in response to USSTRATCOM geolocation requests
Network Operations Floor
Situational Awareness -- Real-time monitoring and fault reporting
NetOps Selectable
Situational Awareness -- Access to real-time spectrum monitoring data
Sources: NetCentric Functional Capabilities Board, 21 Feb 2006, and DISA PL8221, 30 Mar 2006
10. Deliverables Annual reports from Senior Steering Group to Principals on status of:
Compliance of DoD commercial SATCOM services with warfighter requirements for Protection and NetOps
Sharing and protection of critical infrastructure information
Between and among U.S. government and U.S. industry
With operators and authorities in allied and friendly nations.
Operational planning for collaborative preparedness and incident response
Efforts to sustain sovereign rights of space-based U.S. and allied SATCOM systems
ECD: 15 Jan, with presentation to Principals in Feb
Recommendations on possible improvements
Analyses of other issues identified by Working Group
11. Future Schedule 15 Jan 07 Working Group leads provide status report to Senior Steering Group
Satellite 2007 (19 22 Feb 07) Principals Update, Washington, D.C.
Working Group Principals & Industry CEOs will be invited
14. Principals Commander, U.S. Strategic Command
Gen James Cartwright, USMC
Undersecretary of the Air Force/DoD Executive Agent for Space
The Hon. Dr. Ronald Sega
Assistant Secretary of Defense (Networks & Information Integration)
The Hon. John Grimes
Assistant Secretary of Defense (International Security Policy)
The Hon. Peter Flory
Director, Defense Information Systems Agency
Lt Gen Charles Croom, USAF
Director, Command, Control, Communications & Computers, Joint Chiefs of Staff
VADM Nancy Brown, USN
15. Senior Steering Group Standing Members Director, Global Operations, USSTRATCOM (Co-chair)
RADM Melvin Williams, USN
Director, National Security Space Office (Co-chair)
Maj Gen James Armor, USA
Deputy Assistant Secretary (C3, Space & Spectrum), ASD(NII)
Dr. Ronald Jost
Vice Director, DISA
MG Marilyn Quagliotti, USA
Vice Director, Joint Staff J6
MG Stephen Moran, USA
Principal Director for Forces Policy, ASD(ISP)
Brig Gen Katherine Roberts, USAF
16. Senior Steering Group Advisory Members Director, Architecture, Operations, Networks and Space; Office of the Army Chief Information Officer (Army CIO/G-6 AONS)
BG Jeffrey Foley
Director, Network Integration; Office of the Chief of Naval Operations (OPNAV N6F)
RADM Kenneth Deutsch
Director, Command, Control, Communications and Computers; Headquarters, U.S. Marine Corps (HQ USMC C4)
BrigGen George Allen
Director, Information, Services and Integration; Secretary of the Air Force Office of Warfighting Integration and CIO (SAF/XCI)
Maj Gen William Lord
17. DoD Potential-EA/EMI Resolution Process Resolve any suspected EA/EMI at the lowest operational level
Quickly report Potential-EA(EMI/UA) to the GSSC (JSpOC) for Space Situational Awareness & Defensive Space Control
Every case is unique, but four general steps:
Detection (& Report)
Characterization (& Report)
Geolocation (& Report)
Resolution (& Report)
18. Industrys Key Role Continued Active Participant in Resolution
Everyone has a stake in minimizing interference
Help us separate the wheat from the chaff
Report, Report, Report!
Quickly develop a common sight picture
Begin with the End in Mind
Help us procure defendable bandwidth
Increase Prevention Efforts
Industrys SUIRG has good ideas