1 / 22

Re-professionalising the Profession CeGs Guidance Week 29 June, 2007 Jenny Bimrose Jenny.bimrose@warwick.ac.uk

Re-professionalising the Profession CeGs Guidance Week 29 June, 2007 Jenny Bimrose Jenny.bimrose@warwick.ac.uk. Changing concept of ‘career’: ‘ the evolving sequence of a person’s work experiences over time.’

paulos
Download Presentation

Re-professionalising the Profession CeGs Guidance Week 29 June, 2007 Jenny Bimrose Jenny.bimrose@warwick.ac.uk

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Re-professionalising the Profession CeGs Guidance Week 29 June, 2007 Jenny Bimrose Jenny.bimrose@warwick.ac.uk

  2. Changing concept of ‘career’: ‘the evolving sequence of a person’s work experiences over time.’ Ref: Arthur, M.B., Hall, D.T. & Lawrence, B.S. (1989) Handbook of Career Theory, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

  3. Demanding policy context: • Resources • Priorities • Models of delivery • Accountability Change & uncertainty Competition & collaboration Clients & customers

  4. A patchwork of training support: ‘A new, more coherent structure [for training] is necessary to provide clear progression paths’ ‘recurrent training’ for CPD – optional in most countries, including the UK’ Refs: OECD (2003) OECD Review of guidance policies: UK country note. OECD p.26 McCarthy, J. (2001) The skills, training & qualifications of guidance workers. OECD. P.7

  5. Increasing accountability: • immediate outcomes • intermediate outcomes • longer-term outcomes for the individual • longer-term outcomes for the economy

  6. Aim: To use a longitudinal (5 year), qualitative case study approach to investigate the nature of effective guidance

  7. Four key questions: • From whose point-of-view is ‘effective’ defined? • Whose account counts? • How is ‘effectiveness’ defined? • How is ‘guidance’ defined?

  8. CLIENT GUIDANCE INTERVIEW PRACTITIONER ‘EXPERT WITNESS’

  9. Primacy of the ‘USER VOICE’ together with the Practitioner Perspective

  10. Data sources (50 case studies): • digital recordings of the guidance interviews • open-ended, semi-structured questionnaires • ‘baseline data’ on delivery contexts, practitioners and clients

  11. Headlines (2003-2004): • 49 of 50 clients found their interview ‘useful’ • high levels of agreement found re: perceptions of useful guidance • outcomes of guidance defined broadly, in terms of the process of the interview & access to expertise

  12. Headlines (2004-2005): • low attrition rate:45 clients • 87% (n=39):guidance still ‘useful’ • 11% (n=5):less sure of its value • one client: guidance ‘no value’

  13. Headlines (2005-2006) • low attrition rate continued: 80% (n=36) • 72% (n=26):guidance still ‘useful’ • 14% (n=5):less sure of its value • 14% (n=5):couldn’t remember • the ‘negative’ client: recognised some aspects ‘useful’

  14. ‘Useful’ guidance: recurrent themes • provides access to specialist information • insights, focus, confirmatory & confusion reduction • motivates • increases self-confidence • structures opportunities for reflection

  15. Model of guidance-in-action: • building a working alliance • exploration of potential • identification of options & strategies • ending & follow-through

  16. Career decision- making styles: • evaluative • strategic • aspirational • opportunistic

  17. Key findings: practice • matching approaches dominate • little evidence of new approaches • comprehensive range of standard techniques • evidence of non-standard techniques

  18. Key findings: career decision-making • Complex • Multi-dimensional • Often implemented over an extended time frame • Not always ‘rational’

  19. ‘I think it’s nice if you don’t plan too much, because then you’re open to suggestions and things like that’.

  20. Conclusions • Multiple constraints shape practice • New thinking & approaches difficult to implement • Scope for exercising judgements about clients’ best interests limited

  21. Implications for practice? • Need to place less emphasis on planning • Demonstrate more tolerance of un-decidedness • Develop a more vivid sense of context

  22. Links to reports: • Bimrose, J., Barnes, S.A., Hughes, D. and Orton, M.(2004). What is Effective Guidance? Evidence from Longitudinal Case Studies in England. DfES/Warwick Institute for Employment Research. Retrieved on October 26, 2005, Institute for Employment Research website: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/ier/publications/bydate/egr2004.pdf • Bimrose, J., Barnes, S.A. & Hughes, D.(2005). Effective Guidance One Year On: Evidence from Longitudinal Case Studies in England. DfES/Warwick Institute for Employment Research. Retrieved on January 6, 2006, Institute for Employment Research website: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/ier/publications/bydate/2005/egreportoct05.pdf • Bimrose, J., Barnes, S-A. and Hughes, D. (2006). Developing career trajectories in England: the role of effective guidance. Coventry: Warwick Institute for Employment Research, University of Warwick. Retrieved on March 16, 2006, Institute for Employment Research website: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/ier/publications/bydate/egreportnov06.pdf Fourth due autumn, 2007

More Related