850 likes | 1.14k Views
INTRODUCTION TO NEW THEORY OF FLIGHT REVEALING THE SECRET OF FLIGHT. UNDERSTANDING WHY IT IS POSSIBLE TO FLY JOHAN HOFFMAN JOHAN JANSSON CLAES JOHNSON. WEB SITE: THE SECRET OF FLIGHT. http://secretofflight.wordpress.com/ MATHEMATICS FLUID MECHANICS COMPUTATION MEASUREMENT APPLICATIONS
E N D
INTRODUCTION TONEW THEORY OF FLIGHTREVEALINGTHE SECRET OF FLIGHT UNDERSTANDING WHY IT IS POSSIBLE TO FLY JOHAN HOFFMAN JOHAN JANSSON CLAES JOHNSON
WEB SITE: THE SECRET OF FLIGHT http://secretofflight.wordpress.com/ • MATHEMATICS • FLUID MECHANICS • COMPUTATION • MEASUREMENT • APPLICATIONS • HISTORY
NEW THEORY SUBMITTED TO AIAA • MAIN JOURNAL OF AERONAUTICS • NOW UNDER SCRUTINY OF EXPERTS • FOLLOW THE REVIEW PROCESS ON WEB SITE • FIRST VERSION PRESENTED IN NORMAT 2009
OLD THEORY • KUTTA-ZHUKOVSKY 1904 • FATHERS OF MODERN AERONAUTICS • PRANDTL 1904 • FATHER OF MODERN FLUID MECHANICS • KZP THEORY
SCIENTIFIC MATHEMATICAL THEORIES FOR UNEDUCATED: 1. TRIVIAL AND CORRECT 2. TRIVIAL AND INCORRECT FOR EDUCATED: 3. NON-TRIVIAL AND INCORRECT: OLD 4. NON-TRIVIAL AND CORRECT: NEW
NEW THEORY • PHYSICAL • MATHEMATICAL • CORRECT • DOES REVEAL THE SECRET • USEFUL
OLD THEORY • UNPHYSICAL • UNMATHEMATICAL • INCORRECT • DOES NOT REVEAL THE SECRET • DANGEROUS
WHAT TO EXPLAIN: LIFT / DRAG =L/D = 10 - 70AIRBUS L/D=20 GLIDER L/D=70
THE SECRET: L/D = 10 - 70 • SURPRISING • INGENIOUS • ELEGANT • INCOMPRESSIBLE FLOW • SLIGHTLY VISCOUS FLOW
IS THEORY NEEDED? • BIRDS HAVE LEARNED TO FLY WITHOUT • THEORY OF FLIGHT • BUT IT TOOK 100 MILLION YEARS • FROM DINOSAUR TO ARCHAEOPETRYX • HUMANS HAVE LEARNED TO FLY WITHOUT • THEORY OF FLIGHT • BUT IT TOOK 500 YEARS • FROM DA VINCI TO SUCCESS: GOSSAMER CONDOR 1978 • BECAUSE OF LACK OF THEORY!!
NEW YORK TIMES 2003 (CHANG) To those who fear flying, it is probably disconcerting that physicists and aeronautical engineers still passionately debate the fundamental issue underlying this endeavor: WHAT KEEPS PLANES IN THE AIR?
NASA LISTS INCORRECT THEORIES • LONGER DISTANCE • SKIPPING STONE • VENTURI • BUT NO THEORY CLAIMED TO BE CORRECT!! • NASA DOES NOT SEEM TO KNOW WHAT KEEPS PLANES IN THE AIR!!
HOFFREN 2001 AIAA • A SATISFACTORY THEORY OF LIFT IS STILL LACKING • THERE IS A GENUINE NEED FOR ONE
WHAT KEEPS PLANES IN THE AIR? • INCORRECT THEORY OK AS LONG AS YOU DON’T USE IT • NOT USEFUL • NEW THEORY: CORRECT: USEFUL
WHYCORRECT THEORY ONLY 2009? • COMPUTE TURBULENT SOLUTIONS OF • NAVIER-STOKES EQUATIONS + SLIP BC • DIRECT SIMULATION WITHOUT TURBULENCE MODELING • POSSIBLE WITH ~ 1 MILLION MESH POINTS • COMPUTATION TELLS THE TRUTH • STUDY REVEALS THE SECRET
TO UNDERSTAND: STABILITY • STABILITY - INSTABILITY OF FLUID MOTION • STABLE COMPUTABLE ASPECTS OF TURBULENT FLOW • LIFT DRAG MOMENTS..: COMPUTABLE • ALL YOU MAY WANT TO KNOW: COMPUTABLE
FROM CYLINDER TO AIRFOIL: ROUNDED LEADING + TRAILING EDGEUNDERST CYL = UNDERSTAND AIRFOIL
SHORT STORY: THEORIES OF FLIGHT • NEWTON 17H MATH: IMPOSSIBLE: WRONG • D’ALEMBERT 18TH MATH: IMPOSSIBLE: WRONG • WRIGHT BROTHERS 1903 REAL EXP : POSSIBLE • KUTTA-ZHUKOVSKY 1904 MATH: POSSIBLE: WRONG: OLD THEORY OF FLIGHT • HOFFMAN-JOHNSON 2009 MATH: POSSIBLE: RIGHT: NEW THEORY OF FLIGHT
NEW VS OLD THEORY • NEW THEORY REVEALS THE SECRET OF FLIGHT • OLD THEORY HIDES THE SECRET OF FLIGHT • OLD: RULING PARADIGM • OLD: NOT FUNCTIONAL • NEW INCOMPATIBLE WITH OLD • SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTION A LA KUHN
LIFT AND DRAG OF LONG WING • SUCTION ON UPPER LEADING EDGE/SURFACE: • LIFT + NEGATIVE DRAG • PUSH ON LOWER LEADING EDGE/SURFACE: • LIFT + POSITIVE DRAG • FLOW SEPARATES AT TRAILING EDGE WITHOUT PRESSURE RISE/DROP: ELEGANT SEPARATION
OBSERVATION LIFT • UPPER LEADING EDGE SUCTION • LOWER LEADING EDGE PUSH DRAG • LEADING EDGE PUSH/SUCTION • SEPARATION WITHOUT PRESSURE RISE/DROP • DOWNWASH
UNDERSTANDING: THEORY • MATHEMATICAL MODEL OF PHYSICS • ASSUMPTIONS MATHEMATICAL MODEL = EQUATION: • NAVIER-STOKES + BC: GENERAL • LAPLACE + BC: SPECIAL • MATHEMATICAL THEORY: SOLVE EQUATION
LAPLACE EQN: POTENTIAL FLOW • INCOMPRESSIBLE: CORRECT FOR SUBSONIC FLIGHT • INVISCID - SMALL VISCOSITY: CORRECT • SLIP BOUNDARY CONDITION: SMALL SKIN FRICTION: CORRECT • IRROTATIONAL?? NO VORTICES • STATIONARY?? • 2D?? • V = GRADIENT OF HARMONIC FUNCTION • 2D FOR CYLINDER LONG WING • 1 + 2 + 3 VALID!! EVERYWHERE!! NAVIER-STOKES • 4 + 5 +6 VALID?? SOMEWHERE BUT NOT EVERYWHERE!! LAPLACE??
LAPLACE VS NAVIER-STOKES LAPLACE SIMPLIFIED VERSION OF NAVIER-STOKES POTENTIAL SOLUTION: • 2D • STATIONARY • IRROTATIONAL • LAPLACE SOLUTIONS NOT TURBULENT • NAVIER-STOKES SOLUTIONS TURBULENT
CIRC CYLINDER: POTENTIAL FLOW:P = 0 P = 1 P = - 3 V = 1 V = 0 V = 2
POTENTIAL FLOW: BERNOULLI’S LAW ½ V2 + P = CONSTANT • HIGH PRESSURE P – LOW VELOCITY V • LOW PRESSURE P – HIGH VELOCITY V
CIRC CYLINDER: POTENTIAL FLOW:ZERO LIFT + ZERO DRAG(L/D = 3)