350 likes | 576 Views
Low Birth Weight: The Indian Perspective. Prof. H.P.S. Sachdev. DEFINITIONS. WHO (1995) - Based on Global Data Perinatal & Neonatal Morbidity & Mortality Later Growth & Development LBW - Below 2500 g VLBW - Below 1500 g
E N D
Low Birth Weight: The Indian Perspective Prof. H.P.S. Sachdev
DEFINITIONS • WHO (1995) - Based on Global DataPerinatal & Neonatal Morbidity & Mortality Later Growth & Development • LBW - Below 2500 g VLBW - Below 1500 g • Birth weight crude proxy for fetal growth Only measure in Developing Countries • Focus – Optimal fetal development
Global LBW Prevalence (%) Asia 21 Oceania 20 Africa 15 Latin America 11 North America 7 USSR 7 Europe 6 Global 17
Presentation Format • Implications • Epidemiology • Time Comparison • Body Composition • Some Interventions • Public Health Issues
Implications of LBW • Morbidity and Mortality • Subsequent Development • Long term Growth • Adult Degenerative Diseases
Growth in Weight in Delhi LBW Boys Source: Indian Pediatrics 1995; 32: 963
Variation in LBW Prevalence • Inter Regional • Socio-economic • Urban Rural Varies from 10% to 56% Preterms 7.1% to 22.3%
Multicentric Data • National Neonatology Forum (1995/ 2002) Institutional Data on 37082 / 66512 Births LBW - 33% /31.6% VLBW - 3.3% /3.3% Preterm - 12.3% /14.7% • ? Overestimates: Underprivileged and High Risk Population
Multicentric and Other Data • CSSM (1995): 14 District Based Data on 27069 Births - 18.4%, Reliability ?? 2.7% - MP, 5.1%-AS, 25%-TN, 40%-OR • National Family Health Survey(99): 23% (Newborn Weight Recorded in 30% of 32,393 Births; Based on Recall: Bias) • Community surveys 8% - 19%
Type: Heterogeneous Population • Born Too Small (Intrauterine Growth Retarded or SFD; <2SD) OR • Born Too Soon (Preterm <37 Weeks)
LBW Type • NNF Data • Predominantly Term IUGR • Contrast: Developed Overwhelming Preterm
Gestational Distribution • Preterms India 7.1% to 22.3% (12.3%) Developed - 5% • At 36 weeks births 2% (West) vs 3-12% • Maximum Deliveries 40-41 W vs 39-40W • Variation (Socio-economic)
Trends in Low Birth Weight Mean Gest ? 0.8W 0.3W 0 0.7W 20-15% 14-10% Preterm 21-16% 74g Mean Wt 78g 52g 126g ? 1988 1962 1969 1969-73 1986 1989-93 1995 1994
Male Subscapular Trend mm P<0.01 Gestation (Weeks)
Positive Trend in Birth Weight • Improvement possible in current scenario • Both intrauterine growth and gestation contributory
Birth Weight Changes in Developed • Change in BW Comparable (33-100 g) But Prevalence Less • Persistence in Differences Racial Inter-country (ICE Multi-centric)
Early Life Origin of Diabetes F A T N E S S Bhargava, Sachdev, et al. N Engl J Med 2004;350:865-75.
Birth Weight and Infant Fat r=0.62; r2=0.38; p<0.001
Adolescent Pregnancy Mean Marriage Age (Yr) • Indirect Influence Wt, Ht & Nutrition • In U.P. LBW- 67% Preterm - 33%
Results of Systematic Reviews on Macronutrient Supplementation & BW
Food Supplement Consumption ICDS Data Source: Nayar et al. Indian Pediatrics 1997
Results of Systematic Reviews on Micronutrient Supplementation and BW
Does “One Birth Size Fit All” ? • Realistic Prevalence & Time Trends • Surveillance: NNF, Surveys, Sentinel, ICDS • Mix Sustainable Interventions vs Isolated • Body Composition esp. Interven Studies • Predominantly Growth Retarded: Requirements in Exclusively Breast Fed