1 / 14

Social Psychology

Social Psychology. The borderland with sociology Social thinking Social influence Social relations. Social psychology . How do the ways we think, feel, and act change as we participate in groups? Do we think differently about members of a group when we become part of the group?

pelham
Download Presentation

Social Psychology

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Social Psychology The borderland with sociology Social thinking Social influence Social relations

  2. Social psychology • How do the ways we think, feel, and act change as we participate in groups? • Do we think differently about members of a group when we become part of the group? • Why do we act differently in different situations?

  3. Social thinking • How do we think about each other? • Product of nurture? • Is social thinking learned? If so, how? • Is social thinking a kind of problem-solving thinking? • When does social thinking become abnormal? Was the social thinking of the 9/11 terrorists deranged?

  4. Social thinking: Thinking about others • Heider (1958) and attribution theory • Attributions are explanations of the thoughts, feelings, or actions of others. • Attributions may be dispositional, relying on personality for explanations, or situational. • The fundamental attribution error is to emphasize dispositional attributions.

  5. Do attributions matter? • They affect the way we judge others’ motives. • They relate to happiness in marriage. • Happily married people use situational attributions, while unhappily married people use dispositional attributions. • They relate to social and political attitudes. • Try to take the actor’s viewpoint.

  6. Attitudes and actions • Attitudes and actions are in a dynamic interaction. • Attitudes often have little effect on action: we frequently act as hypocrites.

  7. When do attitudes affect acts? • 1. When outside influences are weak • 2. When attitudes are specifically connected to specific behaviors • 3. When we focus on our attitudes • Reminders help: the phylactery effect • Frequent rehearsal of attitudes helps

  8. When do actions affect attitudes? • When we start with small actions: the foot-in-the-door phenomenon • Agreement to small requests • Succumbing to small temptations • Defense mechanism: Rationalization • The principle works for good actions, too • Make small choices to do the right thing

  9. More ways actions affect attitudes • Role playing • Being a college student • Being married • The Stanford prison study (Zimbardo, 1972) • Cognitive dissonance (Festinger) • Even writing essays changes attitudes • Act loving and you become loving: I John.

  10. Social influence • Conformity • Group influence • Individualism

  11. Conformity • We unconsciously imitate others • In behavior • In mood • Reciprocity of liking: Mimic effects • The chameleon effect (Chartrand & Bargh, 1999) • Group pressure (Asch, 1955)

  12. When am I most likely to conform? • When I feel incompetent or insecure • When the group is at least three people, including me. • When I am without support • When I want to fit in and be accepted • When I am uncommitted • When I am being watched • When I am from a collectivist society

  13. Reasons for conforming • Normative social influence • Informational social influence • Especially influential when the decision is important and difficult • Obedience to authority • Milgram’s studies: • Proximal authority figure • Support of a prstigious institution • Depersonalized victim • No role models for defiance

  14. Milgram’s experiment

More Related