370 likes | 569 Views
HPI Training Panel Workshop – Hanford Experience. September 12-13, 2006. Waste Treatment Plant Project Bechtel National Inc. HPI Training Common Themes. Executive DOE/contractor management buy in is essential Joint contractor/DOE training is beneficial
E N D
HPI Training Panel Workshop – Hanford Experience September 12-13, 2006 Waste Treatment Plant ProjectBechtel National Inc.
HPI Training Common Themes • Executive DOE/contractor management buy in is essential • Joint contractor/DOE training is beneficial • Facility specific and general HPI training is well received by all audiences • Management participation enhances training effectiveness • Need a continuing communication process to reinforce concepts and celebrate successes • Interactive training (videos/exercises/role play) is more effective than lecture • Different classes for different audiences is needed • Field workers have less need for theory and more need for practical application
HPI Training Panel Workshop – Hanford ExperienceCH2M HILL Hanford Group, Inc.September 12-13, 2006
HPI Enhancing ISMS Implementation Event Prevention CH2M HILL’s HPI training strategy is to incorporate event prevention tools and precepts throughout its processes to enhance ISMS implementation
Process for Integrating HPI Training Into ISMS • Apply industry (INPO) best practices • Initial HPI training • Perform HPI Gap Analysis • Identify HPI training gaps • Integrate training actions into ISMS improvement plan • Develop HPI Training Needs Analysis • Train the trainer to facility specific processes • Conduct HPI training • Regularly assess effectiveness of HPI training with HPI Steering Committee
HPI (Event Prevention) Training • Focus on facility specific applications allows for immediate application in field • Work packages • Procedures • Engineering Design • Work planning • Walkdowns • Pre-Job Briefings • Work practices • Post-Job Briefings • Lessons Learned • Management / Self Assessment • Event Investigations
HPI Training Courses • Practitioner Class (24 hours) • Work Management Process • Training and Procedures • Trainers • Complete (about 50 trained) • Fundamentals Class (8 hours) • Field Managers • Subject Matter Experts • In progress (about 75 trained) • General Worker Orientation (3 hours) • Supplemented with ongoing training • In progress (about 400 trained) • Introduction to Event Prevention (2 hours) • All field personnel • Complete (about 900 trained)
Lessons Learned • INPO (benchmarked) process was effective • Executive management training and buy-in is essential • Management kickoff sets tone for change • GAP Analysis and training needs analysis effective in determining training content and durations • Facility specific, practical applications allows for immediate application • Facility trainers adds credibility and sustainability • Emphasis on event prevention and ISMS integration • Minimize use of “HPI” terminology or new initiative (flavor of day) • Entertainment examples enhance training experience • Use of badge card with HPI tools beneficial • Procedure checklist and other tools useful for implementation • Cost to develop: $30K (364 person hours) • Cost to provide: $30K (374 person hours) • Student cost: $350K (5100 person hours) • Training took about 6 months to develop and present
CH2M HILL Improvement Cycle *DART 3.6 Human Performance Improvement Training Integration of SWE, ISMS & HPI ISMS Expectations 4/15/05 A-Prefix Farms – Mask Cessation Safe Work Environment (SWE) Culture Assessment Follow-up SWE Survey DART 1.0 Mandatory Respirator Usage in Farms Accident Injury Rate Vapor Issues 244-CR Vault Event 7/22/04 WFO VPP Star Status SWE Mentoring DART 0.1 Problem Evaluation Report (PER) System PIP Addressing OA Vapor Issues Mission Alignment Process (MAP) Disciplinary Process Revised ISMS PIP IROF IROF CH2M Prime Contractor IROF ESTARS 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 *DART – Days Away and Restricted Time Not to scale – For illustration only
HPI Training Panel Workshop – Hanford Experience ISM Best Practice Workshop Aurora, CO Sept 12-13, 2006
HPI Training • HPI Training Plan • Enhance ISM & VPP successes • Understand how events occur working “forward, not backward” • Shift the paradigm (“a new language”) • Audience • Focus on management, supervision, and key Bargaining Unit personnel • Develop Work Force understanding of HPI • Establish HPI mentors to implement the process at the Project level
HPI Training • Training Format • Eight Hour HPI Fundamental Course • Safety Leadership 2006 – The Basics • Why HPI events occur • Error likely situations • Error precursors • Flawed defenses • Over 600 managers and supervisors attended • Over 100 Bargaining Unit Peer Leaders and Support Professionals
HPI Training • Training Format • Four Day HPI Practitioners Course • For those individuals “who will have responsibility for training, implementing or managing a Human Performance Process” • Three Continuing Education Units following course and essay final exam • Application of HPI tools, techniques and problem solving • Focus on error precursor identification, investigation, barriers and case studies • 65 FH graduates • 20 scheduled for classes through CY 2006
HPI TrainingField Pilot Implementation • Pilot Implementation Plan for the Solid Waste Storage and Disposal (SWSD) Facility • Training • Precursor Issues identification • Observation Program • Peer monitoring in the field • Work Planning • Pre Job Briefings • Critique Process • Peer interviews • Three day extension
HPI TrainingField Pilot Implementation • Pilot Implementation Training • SWSD: • Ten Exempt and Bargaining Unit personnel attended the Site HPI Pilot training • Included Facility Director, OS&H Engineer and EZAC chairpersons • Developed HPI project-level Steering Committee • Led / mentored by trained personnel • Initiated Work Force briefing and seminar sessions • Waste Stabilization and Disposition Project • Twenty personnel trained in preparation for Pilot expansion • Included Vice President, several Directors, each Facility Manager and each EZAC Chair
HPI TrainingField Pilot Implementation • Worker briefings and seminars • Safety Day activities at least once each month • Safety meetings and EZACs • Discussed identification of error precursors through photos and videos • Use of HPI language in meetings, daily activities and Project documents
HPI TrainingField Pilot Training • Planning • Project-level training Gap Analysis • Identified training applicable to early stage of HPI development • Focus Areas • HPI concept fundamentals • Safety meetings and briefings • Concepts and application • Interactive review of current topics (Occurrences and recent airline accident in Tennessee), for • Error precursors • Latent weaknesses • Employee involvement training • Skits • Training mock-ups Safety Meeting HPI Skit “Fly with SWSD Air”
HPI TrainingField Pilot Training (Cont’d) • Field Work Supervisor Competency • Work planning, pre-job/post-job, feedback • Skills inventory and improvement planning • Development of Working Leads • Leadership training • Latent Organizational Weaknesses Addressed • Conflict in the workplace (risk acceptance/personality styles) • Emotional I.Q. training • Development of conflict prevention skills
HPI TrainingField Pilot Implementation • Successes of Pilot • Workplace Observer Program improved by focusing on error likely situations rather than physical inspections • Workers self-identify barriers and errors that stall work or create error-traps • Additional Senior Management visibility and interaction with workers • Pre-job briefings focus on critical steps and defenses • Event investigations use HPI techniques with Peer involvement • Early conflict resolution process developed
Future of HPI Training FH views HPI and the next natural progression of VPP & ISM in Improving the “People Side of Safety” • Expand on the pilot successes • Establish company level steering committee • Expand the Pilot to the WSD Project • Continue HPI Practitioner Training • Expand to all FH Projects • Target training courses for specific application • Engineers, planners, critique leaders, procedure writers • Incorporate HPI into site training on • HAZWOPER • Practical - HPI Training Laboratories
River CorridorClosure Project Safety • People • Results HPI Training Panel Workshop – Hanford Experience Phillip Keuhlen Director, Safety, Health & Quality September 12, 2006 U.S. Department of EnergyRichland Operations Office
WCH Approach to Human Performance Improvement • Conceptual Framework: Toolset That Supports Integrated Safety Management • Principle Focus is on Error Prevention • Greater cost benefit ratio than Error Detection or Corrective Action • Field deployable tools • Intuitive understanding
Tailored HPI Training • Certificate Class (U of Idaho, 32 hours)* • First Line Supervisor Workshop (Embedded, 8 hours)* • Manager Fundamentals (8 Hours) • Work Team Orientation (3 Hours) • Continuing Communication Campaign * Highlighted further on following slides
Certificate Class • Formal 32 hour course taught by BushCo with University of Idaho at Idaho Falls certificate • Target objective is development of Subject Matter Experts (~24 graduates) • Management & Staff Sponsors • Event Investigators • Functional SMEs • Safety • Human Resources • Training
First Line Supervisor Training • Part of 24 hour workshop focused on enhancing key leadership behaviors • HPI concepts/tools integrated into the material • Relationship between error rates and cognitive modes with examples from everyday life that are understood intuitively by FLS • Recognition of error likely situations through theory and video exercises • Tools for interactive pre-job briefings, task previews & “time outs” are reviewed & demonstrated • Role play exercises on real job situations
Error Prevention Success Stories • Increased use of “Time Out” practice • Deployment of HPI event investigation software in selected investigations • Increased volume of procedure change requests
Lessons Learned • Introduce new faces and use engaging speakers • Integrate HPI under ISMS umbrella to avoid “new program of the week” • Team training for general employee orientation
HPI Training Panel Workshop – Hanford Experience Presented September 12-13, 2006DOE Integrated Safety Management Best Practices Workshop Stephen WalterProject Environmental Safety & HealthBechtel National, Inc.Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant
It can be hard to change the way people think Changing the Paradigm
Incorporation into other training Crucial Conversation Safety Rally NSQI Steering Committee - Formed Training opened to supervision Selected Participants Trained Gap Analysis conducted DOE HPI - Introduction Champion Selected Human Performance Initiative Nuclear Safety and Quality Culture - ISMS
Implementing Human Performance • Human Performance training – external • 65 trained • 32 completed the 4 day HPI training • ES&H, Engineering, Construction, Quality, Employee Concerns, Human Resources, Commissioning, Procurement • Attended DOE HQ HP TTT • Sent 2 to INPO for Human Performance Lead training
Safety Rally to impart NSQI/HPI vision 6 hour orientation now includes HPI fundamentals concepts Industrial Safety Training courses are being developed to include critical attribute questioning Accident Investigators are being trained to use HPI tools Partnering with Bechtel Power on HP training Learning from others Training Inclusion
Lessons Learned • With so many initiatives employees seek to understand the “why” – what’s in it for me? • Abundance of resources and tools – select a focus • Don’t recreate the wheel • Project specific examples to show value • Benchmark – learn from others successes and errors • HPI will be a work in progress • Implementing Human Performance is not free • You don’t have to create a new program!