1 / 16

Diana Carolina Sánchez Claudia Liliana Garzón Ingrid Hernández

The zoo story . Diana Carolina Sánchez Claudia Liliana Garzón Ingrid Hernández. A INTRODUCTION.

pepper
Download Presentation

Diana Carolina Sánchez Claudia Liliana Garzón Ingrid Hernández

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The zoo story Diana Carolina Sánchez Claudia Liliana Garzón Ingrid Hernández

  2. A INTRODUCTION • The Zoo Story is told about the different character between Peter’s and Jerry’s. Peter’s is from the middle class with a wife, two daughters, two cats and two parakeets and Jerry lives in boarding house and is very trouble they met in Central Park a Sunday afternoon in summer.

  3. The story began when Peter is seated on the bench stage right, and than Jerry enters and asked the question, he went to know the location of the Zoo, then he started to asked Peter and told the story of him.

  4. EDWARD ALBEE • Edward Franklin Albee (Washington DC, March 12, 1928). American playwright, introduced largely to the U.S.. UU. new trends in European drama of the second half of the twentieth century.

  5. Albee is known for works such as: • The Zoo Story (1958) • The Sandbox (1959) • Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf? (1962)

  6. OTHER WORK FROM THE AUTHOR • The Zoo Story (1958) • The Death of Bessie Smith (1959) • The Sandbox (1959) • Fam and Yam (1959) • The American Dream (1960) • Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf? (1961–1962) • The Ballad of the Sad Cafe (1963) (adapted from the novella by Carson McCullers) • Tiny Alice (1964) • Malcolm (1965) (adapted from the novel by James Purdy) • A Delicate Balance (1966) • Breakfast at Tiffany's (1966) • Everything in the Garden (1967) • Box and Quotations from Chairman Mao Tse-Tung (1968) • All Over (1971) • Seascape (1974) • Listening (1975)

  7. LITERARY MOVEMENT His works are considered deep, and present a critical examination of the modern condition. His early works show a mastery and Americanization of the Theatre of the Absurd that had its heyday in the works of European writers such as Jean Genet, Samuel Beckett, and Eugène Ionesco.

  8. The zoo story explores themes of isolation, loneliness, miscommunication as anathematization, social disparity and dehumanization in a commercial world.

  9. LITERARY TECHNIQUE • The anti-hero. • Satire: employs humor to comment negatively • Allegory • Postmodernism.

  10. CHARACTERS

  11. SETTING Place: The physical setting in the play is in the Central Park, with parkland, trees, and the benches Time: • on a sunny afternoon.  • The Zoo Story is set in 1959 and tells of two men, from quite different social and economic statuses. The Social setting in the play is when Peter’s seat on the bench and than Jerry enters and started to conversation

  12. THESIS The theater of the Absurd

  13. The theater of the absurd encompasses a set of works by certain U.S. and European playwrights during the 1940s, 1950s and 1960s and, in general, which grew out of the work of those. It is characterized by frames that seem meaningless, repetitive dialogue and lack of dramatic sequence that often create a dreamlike atmosphere.

  14. The theater of the absurd has strong existentialist traits and questions the society and the individual. Through humor and mystification hid a demanding attitude toward his art. • The inconsistency, nonsense and illogic are also very representative features of these works.

  15. Many see the theater of the absurd as a construction without logical explanations and pointless. It highlights the incongruity between thought and deed, and the inconsistency between the ideologies and actions

  16. THANKS

More Related