150 likes | 161 Views
This report from the 6th International Workshop on Tropical Cyclones covers operational techniques for defining TC structures, including surface wind distribution, eye characteristics, vertical wind and temperature structure, satellite-observed cloud patterns, and more. It emphasizes the importance of technologies like QuikSCAT and the SFMR, alongside conventional satellite imagery and ground-based radar, for accurate TC diagnosis and forecasting. The report also discusses UAVs like the Aerosonde and programs like DOTSTAR for monitoring TCs, highlighting advancements and challenges in the field.
E N D
WMO 6th International Workshop on Tropical Cyclones San Jose, Costa Rica. (20-30 November 2006) Dr. Mark A. Lander University of Guam Topic 1.4: Operational Techniques in Defining TC Structure.
Topic 1.4: Operational Techniques in Defining TC StructureRapporteur: Mark A. LanderUniversity of GuamUOG StationMangilao, Guam (USA) 96923E-mail: mlander@uog.eduFax: 1-671-734-8890Working Group: A. Zhao, C.-S. Liou, K. Cheung, R. Edson, and J. Franklin
Pongsona floodwater destruction in Lonfit River 100-year stream flows (USGS)
What Structures are of operational importance? (1) surface wind distribution; (2) eye characteristics; (3) vertical structure of the wind and temperature; (4) Satellite-observed cloud patterns; (5) critical boundary layer profiles (e.g., changes as TC moves overcolder water) (6) sub-kilometer scale wind patterns in the TC core that might have a substantial impact on air-sea exchanges.
6th INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP on TROPICAL CYCLONES Topic 1.4: Operational Techniques in Defining TC Structure 1.4.1: Overview 1.4.2. The TC surface wind distribution 1.4.2 Eye Characteristics (a) Concentric eyewalls (b) Annular Hurricanes 1.4.3 Vertical Structure of the wind and temperature 1.4.4 Summary of new instrumentation for observing TC structure (a) QuikSCAT (b) The Stepped-Frequency Microwave Radiometer (SFMR) (c) The TRMM precipitation radar (d) Other sensors Conventional Visible and Infrared satellite imagery, passive microwave imagery, ground-based radar, and TC reconnaissance aircraft
Reconstructed wind-radii table used at the JTWC (Sampson and Edson, personal communication)
This report highlights QuikSCAT and the SFMR as technologies that promise great advances in operational ability to diagnose TC structure. The TC community must convey to policy makers the high priority of these two technologies. There are many other sensors that help the forecaster to diagnose TC structure: Conventional Visible and Infrared satellite imagery, passive microwave imagery, and ground-based radar. The conventional visible and infrared satellite pictures are the “bread and butter” of TC structure diagnosis, and will continue to be the anchor sensors for determining TC structure. TC reconnaissance aircraft will likely remain a tool for only the most affluent, but smaller unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) may provide a less expensive alternative for in situ monitoring of TCs. One such UAV, the Aerosonde (http://www.aerosonde.com/) is scheduled in 2006 for single or multiple experiments coordinated with NOAA and AFRES aircraft missions. Since 2003, the Dropsonde Observations for Typhoon Surveillance near the TAiwan Regions (DOTSTAR; Wu et al. 2005) program has conducted 19 typhoon surveillance missions with the Astra aircraft in North-western Pacific. For some target typhoons, the impact of dropwindsonde data on mesoscale weather prediction was investigated. Experiments were made to test the impact of the subset of the dropwindsonde data, Taiwan terrain, vortex bogusing, and data assimilation schemes.
TS RUMBIA Quikscat and obs from ship Liberty Eagle circa 00 UTC 05 Oct 2006