160 likes | 317 Views
Numerical abilities in children with hemiplegia. Catherine THEVENOT & Joël FLUSS University of Geneva, Switzerland. Cape Town , South Africa – July 2012. Fingers. Constitute aids to represent numbers. Help keeping track of number words in counting.
E N D
Numericalabilities in childrenwith hemiplegia Catherine THEVENOT & Joël FLUSS University of Geneva, Switzerland Cape Town, South Africa – July 2012
Fingers Constituteaids to representnumbers Help keeping track of number words in counting Allow the comprehension of the 10-base numerical system Help for basic arithmetic operations Functionalrole in the development of numericalabilities? Manumerical cognition hypothesis
Manumerical cognition hypothesis Digital discrimination in 5- to 6-year-old children are better predictors of mathematical abilities than more classic intelligence tests (Fayol, Barrouillet & Marinthe, 1998) Training digital discrimination improves performance in numerical abilities (Gracia-Baffaluy & Noel, 2008; but see Fischer 2010) But isthere a functionallink ? Do numericalabilitiesreallydevelopfromfingerdiscrimation and use ?
The structural view Finger representations rely on the same brain area than number processing There is no causal link between fingers and numbers but the relationship is due to the proximity of the brain areas
Structural vs. Functionalviews Hemiplegicchildren cannot use one of their hands Numericaldifficulties Functionalhypothesis: Numericaldifficulties in symbolicnumericaltask but not in non-symbolictasks Structural hypothesis: Numericaldifficulties in symbolic and non-symbolictasks
Structural vs. Functionalviews Hemiplegicchildren cannot use one of their hands Numericaldifficulties Functionalhypothesis: Numericaldifficulties in symbolicnumericaltask but not in non-symbolictasks Structural hypothesis: Numericaldifficulties in symbolic and non-symbolictasks
The experiment Children : 10 7- to 11-year-oldchildrenwith hemiplegia 10 control children Tasks : Non-symboliccomparisontask
The experiment Children : 10 7- to 11-year-oldchildrenwith hemiplegia 10 control children Tasks : Spontaneousfinger use in countingtask It isnice to behere in South Africa
The experiment Children : 10 7- to 11-year-oldchildrenwith hemiplegia 10 control children Tasks : Fingerdiscrimation
The experiment Children : 10 7- to 11-year-oldchildrenwith hemiplegia 10 control children Tasks : Finger pattern recognition
The experiment Children : 10 7- to 11-year-oldchildrenwith hemiplegia 10 control children Tasks : Countingtask
The experiment Children : 10 7- to 11-year-oldchildrenwith hemiplegia 10 control children Tasks : Symboliccomparison 9 7 Thursday Saturday
Results PRESERVED DAMAGED Non-symboliccomparison Finger discrimination Spontaneousfinger use Finger pattern recognition Counting Numbercomparison Day comparison (both hands)
Conclusions Childrenwith hemiplegia presentdifficultieswithfinger discrimination, fingercounting, finger pattern recognition Theypresentdifficultieswithsymbolicnumericalactivities But no difficultywith non-symbolicnumericalactivities It is not because the brain area devoted to fingerrepresentations
Conclusions It is not because the brain area devoted to fingerrepresentationsisdamagedthat all numberactivites are damaged This contradicts the structural hypothesis But favors the functional one postulatingthatsymbolicnumericalabilitiesdevelopfromfinger discrimination and use