1 / 15

Participatory Pattern in Asynchronous Discussion Forum: A Cross-cultural Perspective

Participatory Pattern in Asynchronous Discussion Forum: A Cross-cultural Perspective. Nawaz Khan and Geetha Abeysinghe School of Engineering and Information Sciences Middlexex University, London 26 August, 2009, HEA 10 th Annual Conference. Talk Outline. Context setting

perrin
Download Presentation

Participatory Pattern in Asynchronous Discussion Forum: A Cross-cultural Perspective

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Participatory Pattern in Asynchronous Discussion Forum: A Cross-cultural Perspective Nawaz Khan and GeethaAbeysinghe School of Engineering and Information Sciences Middlexex University, London 26 August, 2009, HEA 10th Annual Conference

  2. Talk Outline • Context setting • Purpose of the study • Approach • Observations • Conceptualisation of the factors • Conclusion

  3. Context Setting • Asynchronous online discussion has been extensively applied in actual learning scenarios, and many researchers have also explored the benefits of asynchronous discussion toward learning, i.e. Vonderwell, 2003; Bodzin & Park, 2000; Henri, 1992. • Design of online discussion activities imposes great influence on the quality of online discussion (Patricia & Dabbagh, 2005; Hewitt, 2003; Vonderwell, 2003; Swan et al., 2000; Vrasidas & McIsaac, 1999).

  4. Context Setting – Contd. • Collaborative knowledge building and achieving a highest level of critical analysis through online discussion not only depend on the students’ interest on the content but also on several factors that influence their participatory behaviour. • In order to design more suitable online discussion activities, adequate guidance from teachers and strategies for intervention are key.

  5. Research indicates that asynchronous discussions have been evaluated positively by non-native students • Non-native students often do not participate much in face-to-face class situations because they lack linguistic flexibility to make contributions quickly • Research suggests that (Kahmi-Stein) asynchronous discussions may be a medium for non-native students to overcome their linguistic limitations and to develop critical thinking abilities.

  6. Purpose of the study • In this paper, we argue that, the participatory behaviour of students is largely influenced by the practices in their own country of origin, culture and background. • Cultural diversity needs to be an asset rather than a hindrance. So, how do we overcome the cultural barriers? ‘What role does culture play in individual participation and communication styles?’

  7. Approach • four focus groups (F1, F2, F3 and F4) were created. The purposes of these focus groups were to: i. monitor the behaviour in asynchronous discussion forum; ii. receive continuous feedback on the design and implementation of the asynchronous discussion forum and to observe the participatory behaviour; and iii. observe participatory behaviour of the focus group in a complete online teaching environment where classroom based teaching is not offered at all

  8. Focus Group Composition

  9. Activities of Focus Groups • Questionnaire based survey is conducted on 180 overseas students

  10. Observations

  11. Observations – Contd. • Observation (O1):The preference for discussion topic is not same but similar for a specific culture. Experience and background of the participants create an impact on the participation and engagement pattern in online discussion forums • Out of 10 different types of discussion topics, the following was observed about the preference of the discussion topic: • Indian students preferred a topic where they expect a business case will be provided for analysis; • Sri Lankan students preferred a topic where that gives a real life business scenario where they can apply their previous experience; • Chinese students preferred a topic that focus on a specific problem. • The overseas students did not show an interest in the type of questions where they have to formulate a research question or to derive a conclusion of a discussion

  12. Observation – Contd. • Observation (O2):Expectation from discussion forum varies from culture to culture. • Indian students reported that they prefer solutions to their problems to be provided in the discussion forum and very similar expectations were exhibited by the Pakistani and Nigerian students. • Cypriot students on the other hand showed that they are interested in sharing views and to reach to a common agreement. • When the feedback on discussion topic selection was incorporated in A3, it was observed that the participation by the Cyprus and Egypt students has increased at least by 12%.

  13. Observation – Contd. • Observation (O3):Local working environment and national competency influence significantly on engaging in online discussion. • Ability to use tools for education • Curriculum and national competency at the country of origin • Familiarity with the local working environment

  14. Conceptualisation of the Cultural Factors

  15. Conclusion • students’ participation pattern and their engagement in asynchronous discussion varies due to their preferences and enthusiasm on the discussion topic • It is evident from the study that this preferences are dominated by their cultural background and other factors like local experiences and work environment • Based on the observations we propose a set of constructs which can facilitate in designing a discussion forum

More Related