1 / 11

The Wave Nature of Matter

‘ If someone tells you that they understand Quantum Mechanics, they are fooling themselves ’. -Richard Feynman. The Wave Nature of Matter. 13.1.5 to 13.1.7. The de Broglie Hypothesis and Matter Waves.

perrin
Download Presentation

The Wave Nature of Matter

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ‘If someone tells you that they understand Quantum Mechanics, they are fooling themselves’. -Richard Feynman The Wave Nature of Matter 13.1.5 to 13.1.7

  2. The de BroglieHypothesis and Matter Waves • In 1923 Louis de Broglie suggested that since nature should be symmetrical, that just as waves could exhibit particle properties, then what are considered to be particles should exhibit wave properties.

  3. Derivation of the de Broglie Wavelength

  4. Based on this result, the de Broglie hypothesis is that any particle will have an associated wavelength given by p = h /λ • The waves to which the wavelength relates are called matter waves. • For a person of 70 kg running with a speed of 5 m/s, the wavelength λ associated with the person is given by: • This wavelength is minute to say the least. However, consider an electron moving with speed of 107 m/s, then its associated wavelength is: Although small, this is measurable.

  5. Experimental Verification of thede Broglie Hypothesis • In 1927 Clinton Davisson and Lester Germer who both worked at the Bell Laboratory in New Jersey, USA, were studying the scattering of electrons by a nickel crystal. A schematic diagram of their apparatus is shown.

  6. Their vacuum system broke down and the crystal oxidized. To remove the oxidization, Davisson and Germerheated the crystal to a high temperature. On continuing the experiment they found that the intensity of the scattered electrons went through a series of maxima and minima the electrons were being diffracted. The heating of the nickel crystal had changed it into a single crystal and the electrons were now behaving just as scattered X-rays do. • Effectively, that lattice ions of the crystal act as a diffraction grating whose slit width is equal to the spacing of the lattice ions.

  7. Davisson and Germer were able to calculate the de Broglie wavelength λ of the electrons from the potential difference V through which they had been accelerated. • They knew the spacing of the lattice ions from X-ray measurements and so were able to calculate the predicted diffraction angles for a wavelength equal to the de Broglie wavelength of the electrons. The predicted angles were in close agreement with the measured angles and the de Broglie hypothesis was verified – particles behave as waves.

  8. The Math from the Davisson-Germer Experiment

  9. Examples: • Calculate the de Broglie wavelength of an electron after acceleration through a potential difference of 75 V.

  10. 2. Determine the ratio of the de Broglie wavelength of an electron to that of a proton accelerated through the same magnitude of potential difference.

  11. Homework: • Tsokos • Page 395 • Questions 1 to 11

More Related