180 likes | 296 Views
Grant Writing Workshop. North Carolina Conference of the United Methodist Church. Video-streaming Participants and On-site Participants. grantworkshop@nccumc.org. Acknowledgements. Carol Goehring and NCCUMC Staff Maria Clay OTHER ITEMS……….. Cell Phones on Vibrate. Welcome.
E N D
Grant Writing Workshop North Carolina Conference of the United Methodist Church
Video-streaming ParticipantsandOn-site Participants grantworkshop@nccumc.org
Acknowledgements • Carol Goehring and NCCUMC Staff • Maria Clay • OTHER ITEMS……….. • Cell Phones on Vibrate
Welcome • Face to Face and Live Video Streaming • Bill Norton, Crew Introductions and Venue Instructions • Housekeeping Notes • Lunch and Breaks • Much Appreciation is expressed to: • Westminister United Methodist Church and Staff
Workshop Objectives • Learn Skills for writing and submitting grants • Demonstrate how to research and understand the priorities of funders • Develop strategic planning skills that lead to receiving on-going funding.
Participants will learn to: Session 1 AM: Components I Session 1 PM: Components II Methods Provide Plan of Activities/Timeline Personnel Insure Plan is Inclusive/Exhaustive Provide Rationale/Abilities Equipment/Facilities Clarify existing/needed Budget Itemized/Justified Evaluation Measurable • Re-acquaintance • Review • Purpose Statement • Establish Need • Objectives • Set Goal/Objectives (3) • List Potential Outcomes • Significance • Quantify Impacts/Importance
Re-acquaintance/New Intros • Mine: • Sandy Bottom, NC • Webb Chapel UMC • Rev. Marty Greer • Beulaville & Kenansville • PhD Nursing • Grant Experience • Duke • HRSA • KB Reynolds • Golden Leaf • NCHC • NLN • Partnerships for Children • NEW Attendees • Type on computer or write on card • Name • Church • Role • Grant Interest rationale • (Why are you here) • Share
Review • Funding Priority • Non-grant Resources • Needs Assessment • Funders • Grantors----Match Vision/Mission
Purpose Statement • The problem statement presents the reasons why the project has been designed. The problem should be supported by evidence drawn from experience, statistics provided by authoritative sources, and appropriate literature. This section should avoid the use of jargon and instead use “human terms” and descriptions to present the problem. • SHARE……………..Group Input/Critique
Objectives • Set Goal/Objectives (3) Brief………clear • Identification of anticipated outcomes of the project in clearly specified terms. In most cases, an objective should be provided to meet each major need identified in the previous section. • Share……………………….Group Input/Critique
Significance • Importance of proposal to population impacted • Congruency with grantor mission and vision • Extraneous importance • Again………….brief………..concise……….focused • SHARE……………..Group Input………Critique
LUNCH • Please take time to discuss with one another feedback that may have been restricted due to time limitations.
Methods • This section describes, in explicit detail, how the researcher proposes to meet his stated objectives. An overall design may be described, but it its essential that specific procedures be identified. • Plan should include activities, timeline, and may refer to Appendix for Policy and Procedures.
Personnel • Insure Plan is Inclusive/Exhaustive • Consider all paid and non-paid (volunteers) • Roles for operations • Outline time commitments • Provide Rationale/Abilities • Biographies that outline skills (qualifications) for fulfilling roles. • SHARE…………Group Input………Critique
Equipment • Again…………….inclusive and exhaustive • Facilities • Operational Needs • Program Needs • Think of what you have and what is needed both are important • NO Sharing this time pass to next item
Budget • Personnel Cost • Equipment Cost • Other operational cost • Rent • Utilities • Etcetera………..for period of grant declining • Draft and work on briefly……..safe details for Homework
Evaluation • Product evaluation • addresses the results/impact that can be attributed to the project and whether these results have satisfied the objectives set forth in the proposal • Process evaluation • addresses how the actual project was conducted and if it was consistent with the proposed plan of action.. • MORE on evaluation the final session
Daily Evaluation • Type or Write on Card: • Daily objectives met through activities. • Insights. • Needs. • Technology Support. • Speaker.