1 / 8

Report workshop 2 Eqavet meeting NRP

Report workshop 2 Eqavet meeting NRP. 16-17 November 2010. Index. Process reporting Recommendations. Process reporting. Guidance in building qa is helpful Analysing the indicative descriptors is useful

petula
Download Presentation

Report workshop 2 Eqavet meeting NRP

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Report workshop 2Eqavet meeting NRP 16-17 November 2010

  2. Index • Process reporting • Recommendations

  3. Process reporting • Guidance in building qa is helpful • Analysing the indicative descriptors is useful • Tools and experience of earlier work speed up the peer learning and exploring the implementation • Indicators are already being used in countries but in various ways and with different emphasis.

  4. Process reporting continued • Europeanframeworkhelps to give a boost onnational level to ask VET providers to account forsatisfactionrate, succes rate and soon. • Constraint: reluctance to bebenchmarked at national level. Somecountrieslike Finland alreadypracticethis, othersfindit a challenge. • The currentwork to developguidance tools in the twoworkinggroup is usefulfor peer learning and to assist NRP in theirwork.

  5. Process conclusion • The work has only started and the exercise of learning to understand quality assurance with the descriptors and indicators should be carried through in widening circles: the network and experts on European level, the national stakeholders, the VET providers themselves, the teachers and trainers, the social partners.

  6. Recommmendationfor the Bruges conference: strategicpolicy level • Confirmation and greenlight on compatibility • Understanding European and national drivers of change

  7. Green light for compatibility • Talking the same language, using the same pair of eyes, sharing the mind set on quality assurance. Phases for development: from understanding, to interpreting the meaning, to deciding on action. Voluntary transparency, respect for diversity and national, regional context. But compatibility is necessary, therefore peer learning, reflection and action is needed. A green light is recommended.

  8. Drivers of change on European and national level • Different networks operate nowadays to realise the shift to learning outcomes on EQF, EQAVET, Europass, ECVET and apl. In the work of these networks that are active on different levels from policy makers, coordination points, and users. To have a more integrated approach, more coordination and cross links are needed between the different parts, so that the eqf networkers explore quality assurance and the other way around, that e.g. eqavet networkers explore where ecvet or apl fits in.

More Related