1 / 28

Synthetic Aperture Radar.

Synthetic Aperture Radar. Material from: SAR Light Lectures by J.J.Mohr ESA TM-19 A,B,C. Skagen Investigation DESCW - ESA. Synthetic Aperture Radar. Synthetic Aperture Radar. Synthetic Aperture Radar. Synthetic Aperture Radar. Synthetic Aperture Radar.

phiala
Download Presentation

Synthetic Aperture Radar.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Synthetic Aperture Radar. • Material from: • SAR Light Lectures by J.J.Mohr • ESA TM-19 A,B,C. • Skagen Investigation • DESCW - ESA C.C.Tscherning, Sat_geoph11, lec_day_10_1.ppt, 2013-12-21.

  2. Synthetic Aperture Radar. C.C.Tscherning, Sat_geoph11, lec_day_10_1.ppt, 2013-12-21.

  3. Synthetic Aperture Radar. C.C.Tscherning, Sat_geoph11, lec_day_10_1.ppt, 2013-12-21.

  4. Synthetic Aperture Radar. C.C.Tscherning, Sat_geoph11, lec_day_10_1.ppt, 2013-12-21.

  5. Synthetic Aperture Radar. C.C.Tscherning, Sat_geoph11, lec_day_10_1.ppt, 2013-12-21.

  6. Synthetic Aperture Radar. C.C.Tscherning, Sat_geoph11, lec_day_10_1.ppt, 2013-12-21.

  7. Synthetic Aperture Radar Interferometry. C.C.Tscherning, Sat_geoph11, lec_day_10_1.ppt, 2013-12-21.

  8. Synthetic Aperture Radar Interferometry. C.C.Tscherning, Sat_geoph11, lec_day_10_1.ppt, 2013-12-21.

  9. Synthetic Aperture Radar Interferometry. C.C.Tscherning, Sat_geoph11, lec_day_10_1.ppt, 2013-12-21.

  10. Synthetic Aperture Radar Interferometry. C.C.Tscherning, Sat_geoph11, lec_day_10_1.ppt, 2013-12-21.

  11. Synthetic Aperture Radar Interferometry. C.C.Tscherning, Sat_geoph11, lec_day_10_1.ppt, 2013-12-21.

  12. SAR Differential Interferometry. C.C.Tscherning, Sat_geoph11, lec_day_10_1.ppt, 2013-12-21.

  13. Synthetic Aperture Radar Interferometry. C.C.Tscherning, Sat_geoph11, lec_day_10_1.ppt, 2013-12-21.

  14. Synthetic Aperture Radar Interferometry. C.C.Tscherning, Sat_geoph11, lec_day_10_1.ppt, 2013-12-21.

  15. June 13, 2006 15

  16. June 13, 2006 16

  17. benchmarks June 13, 2006 17

  18. SAR data • Finally selected scenes from tracks 065 and 315

  19. PSI procesing of descending stack Master orbit: 06933

  20. Master Image Orbit: 06933 Date: 17-Aug-1996 Sensor: ERS-2 Orbit:

  21. SIR-C/X data (Just to check) C-band Sensor: SIR – C, L Incidence angle: 39.721 Date: 04-Oct-1994 Colors: R: HH component G: TP (total power) B: VV component L-band

  22. Processing difficulties - coregistration Coregistration of the area is not straightforward. (Resampling polynomial is not well-confined due to the incoherent water areas.) The placement of fine coregistration windows has been limited only to land areas. After quite some manual fine tuning, the results were satisfactory. The coordinates of the window centres have been stored in the file coreg_points.txt and introduced within the processing. FC_IN_POS doris card

  23. InSAR and PSI processing • 38 ERS-1/2 SAR images • Image crop of 10200 X 2200 pixels has been processed • 36 interferograms used for PS processing, some examples:

  24. Processing problems -PSI Masked areas over the sea PSC network – after applying the masking

  25. Preliminary results • The first reasonable result of the descending stack processing • Good coverage of Skagen town • However, the main problem is the lack of coherent points on the main arm of the peninsula. This results in a weak connection of the tip of the peninsula to the main land. Many arcs are still rejected • Therefore, the color differences between Skagen city and the rest of the area should not yet be quantitatively interpreted.

  26. Preliminary results • The points detected within Skagen city suggest that the highest subsidence rates are between the harbor area and the village The subsidence velocity of the harbour relative to the city is about 8-10 mm/year • However, due to weak connection within the network the subsidence rate between Skagen city and the mainland is still not well defined • We are currently trying different manual tricks to obtain at least some coherent arcs in this area.

  27. Conclusions • Interferometric processing OK (Problems in coregistration were solved) • Coherent information over village and build-up areas • Poor connection between coherent patches: many rejected arcs • Improvement of connection still ongoing • Relative subsidence of Skagen harbor detected of 8-10 mm/y

More Related