200 likes | 309 Views
Progress in High Risk ACS/PCI. Advanced Cardiovascular Interventions, London January 27, 2011 Efthymios N. Deliargyris , MD, FACC, FESC, FSCAI European Medical Director The Medicines Company. My Conflicts of Interest are. The Medicines Company (employee). 16.5%. 14.0%. 11.9%. 10.3%.
E N D
Progress in High Risk ACS/PCI Advanced Cardiovascular Interventions, London January 27, 2011 Efthymios N. Deliargyris, MD, FACC, FESC, FSCAIEuropean Medical DirectorThe Medicines Company
My Conflicts of Interest are The Medicines Company (employee)
16.5% 14.0% 11.9% 10.3% 11.8% 9.9% 8.3% 7.0% Heparin Heparin outcomes by risk strata • Results in pre-specified increasing high-risk patients • Henry J Inv Cardiol. 2002;14(suppl B):19B-29B Bittl JA et al. Am Heart J. 2001;142:952-59 Hemorrhage Death, MI, URV UA, on prior heparin & <14 days post-MI n = 241 UA & on prior heparin n = 1,006 <14 days Post MI n = 741 Unstable angina n = 2,806 % of patients with events at 7 days
10.5% 8.1% 14.3% 6.5% 10.7% 10.3% Cleveland Clinic Meta-analysis • EPIC, EPILOG, CAPTURE, RAPPORT, IMPACT-II, EPISTENT, BAT • Data on file. The Medicines Company Bleeding Death, MI, revasc High dose heparin (n = 2,151) Low dose heparin with GPI (n = 7,629) Low dose heparin (n = 4,578) 15 10 5 0 5 10 % of patients with events at 7 days
Mortality & GPIIb/IIIa inhibition • 6 month cumulative death rates in PCI trials • Karvouni JACC 2003; 41: 26-32 Risk ratio for death (95% CI) Study Year #Pts EPIC 1994 2099 CAPTURE 1997 1265 EPILOG 1997 2792 RAPPORT 1998 483 RESTORE 1998 2141 ERASURE 1999 225 EPISTENT 1999 1603 ISAR 2 2000 401 ESPRIT 2001 2064 ADMIRAL 2001 300 Tamburino 2002 107 CADILLAC-P 2002 1036 CADILLAC-P 2002 1046 Petronio 2002 89 Overall 15651 0.79 (0.64-0.97) p-value = 0.048 0.1 1 10 Control better Treatment better
Meta-analysis of GPIIb/IIIa trials in primary PCI • RAPPORT, ISAR-2, CADILLAC, ADMIRAL • Kandzari, Am Heart J 2004;147:457–62.) Placebo Better Abciximab better
Bivalirudin Trials Ischemic* and Bleeding Outcomes • *Ischemic endpoints: death, MI, and revascularization • Lincoff AM et al. JAMA. 2003;289:853-863. 2 Stone GW et al. NEJM. 2006;355:2203-2216. 3 Stone GW. NEJM 2008;358:2218-30 Bivalirudin Heparin + GP IIb/IIIa 10% 10% 10% P<.001 P=.32 P=.23 8.3% 7.8% 8% 8% 8% 7.3% P=.95 7.0% P<.001 6.2% P<.001 5.7% 5.5% 6% 6% 6% 5.4% 30 day events (%) 4.9% 4.2% 4% 4% 4% 3.0% 2.4% 2% 2% 2% 0% 0% 0% Ischemia Bleeding Ischemia Bleeding Ischemia Bleeding HORIZONS-AMI3 N=3,602 UFH ± GP IIb/IIIavs Bivalirudin(primary PCI) REPLACE-21 N=6,002 UFH +GP IIb/IIIavs Bivalirudin (Urgent/elective PCI) ACUITY2 N=9,215 UFH + abciximabvs Bivalirudin +GPIIb/IIIa (ACS)
HORIZONS-AMI • Three-year all cause mortality Bivalirudin alone (n=1800) 10 Heparin + GPIIb/IIIa (n=1802) 9 7.7% 8 7 5.9% 6 All-Cause Mortality (%) 5 4 3-yr HR [95%CI] 3 0.75 [0.58, 0.97] 2 p-value = 0.03 1 0 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 Months
HORIZONS: • 1 year mortality CADILLAC Risk Score • * Subset of patients in HORIZONS-AMI with CADILLAC risk score data • Parodi G, et al JACC Interv 2010;3:796–802 RR 0.53 P=0.01 1-year mortality (%) RR 1.0 P=0.99 RR 0.34 P=0.09 N=1522 N=531 N=437
1 year bleeding by risk category and treatment – CADILLAC Risk Score • Parodi G, et al JACC Interv 2010;3:796–802 P=0.135 P=0.281 1-year bleeding rates (%) P=0.0005 N=1522 N=531 N=437
High Risk Analysis Populations: • Bivalirudin vs. Heparin + GP IIb/IIIa • All patients (ITT) REPLACE-2N = 5,986 ACUITY N = 9,215 HORIZONS N = 3,602 N = 18,803 • All patients with DAPT at any time before angiography REPLACE-2N = 5,052 ACUITY N = 5,716 HORIZONS N = 3,490 N = 14,258 Risk Factors included in the stratification model: 1) Age>65, 2) Diabetes, 3) Hypertension, 4) Creatinineclearance<60mg/mL, 5) LVEF<35%, 6)NSTEMI, 7)STEMI, 8)Previous MI and 9) hematocrit<36.
Pooled analysis, 1-year mortality • DAPT Population (n=14,258*) • † fixed model ‡random effects model • Data on File, The Medicines Company Heparin + GPIIb/IIIa better Bivalirudin better
30-day and 1-year Mortality: Low vs. High Risk • DAPT Population (n=14,258) • Data on File, The Medicines Company Low Risk = 8082 High Risk = 6176 Heparin + GPIIb/IIIa better Bivalirudin better
1-year mortality, ≥ 3 risk factors(n=6,176) • Data on file, The Medicines Company. • *DAPT population 7.1% 4.9% 1-year death (%)
1-year mortality by High Risk Subgroups • Consistent effect in all subsets • Data on File, The Medicines Company Bivalirudin better Heparin + GPIIb/IIIabetter
1-year mortality, LVEF <35 • (n=682, overall 1 year mortality rate of 12%) • Data on file, The Medicines Company. • *DAPT population 16.9% 1-year death (%) 7.8%
1-year mortality by LVEF • Consistent effect in REPLACE-2, ACUITY, HORIZONS • *DAPT population • Data on File, The Medicines Company Bivalirudin better Heparin + GPIIb/IIIabetter
Progress in High Risk ACS/PCIConclusions • Indirect and unpredictable thrombin inhibition by UFH provides inadequate ischemic protection in high risk ACS • The addition of GPI’s improves ischemic protection at the cost of increased bleeding – modest if any mortality benefit • Bivalirudin trials have consistently demonstrated equivalent efficacy to GPI+UFH with reduced bleeding • HORIZONS showed mortality benefit with bivalirudin out to 3 years, especially in high risk patients • In a pooled analysis set (n=14,258, DAPT treated patients): • 20% reduction in all-cause 1-year mortality • Greater efficacy in high risk population (>3RF’s) LVEF<35%, STEMI, Cr Clear<60 mg/mL, age>65 - Pronounced mortality benefit in low LVEF patients is an intriguing finding requiring further study
3.3% 5.8% Bivalirudin 16.5% 14.0% Heparin 4.1% 7.4% Bivalirudin 11.9% 10.3% Heparin 2.4% 4.9% Bivalirudin 11.8% 9.9% Heparin 3.8% 6.1% Bivalirudin 8.3% 7.0% Heparin Heparin Heparin vs. BivalirudinOutcomes by risk strata B•A•T • Results in pre-specified increasing high-risk patients Hemorrhage Death, MI, revasc UA, on UFH & <14 days post-MI n = 241 UA & on prior heparin n = 1,006 <14 days Post-MI n = 741 Unstable angina n = 2,806 % of patients with events at 7 days Bittl JA et al. Am Heart J. 2001;142:952-59 Henry J Inv Cardiol. 2002;14(suppl B):19B-29B
ACS/PCI Risk Stratification • 1Boersma E, et al. Circulation2000;101:2557-67; 2Madan P, et al. Am Heart J2008;155:1068-74; 3Antman EM, et al. JAMA2000;284:835-42; 5Eagle KA, et al. JAMA2004;291:2727-33; 6Addala S, et al. Am J Cardiol2004;93:629–32; 7Halkin A, et al. J Am CollCardiol 2005;45:1397–1405