1 / 33

Magnetic side of Strongly coupled Quark-Gluon Plasma

Magnetic side of Strongly coupled Quark-Gluon Plasma. (GGI program, June 2008) Edward Shuryak Stony Brook. Collaborators: Jinfeng Liao, Marco Cristoforetti. outline. Map and main questions Electric-magnetic duality and couplings (fight,competition…) on the QCD phase diagram

pia
Download Presentation

Magnetic side of Strongly coupled Quark-Gluon Plasma

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Magnetic side of Strongly coupled Quark-Gluon Plasma (GGI program, June 2008) Edward Shuryak Stony Brook Collaborators: Jinfeng Liao, Marco Cristoforetti

  2. outline • Map and main questions • Electric-magnetic duality and couplings (fight,competition…) on the QCD phase diagram • Lattice monopoles behave like the usual particles: lattice correlators vs MD • Novel plasmas with both electric and magnetic particles: MD => transport • Stable and metastable flux tubes • BEC condensation criterium for interacting gases • conclusions

  3. Prologue: multiple views on sQGP (which forced us to learn a lot in the last few years…) Quantum mechanics Stronly coupled cold trapped Atoms: 2nd best liquid Manybody theory Lattice simulations sQGP Quasiparticles Potentials correlators Bound states of EQP and MQP J/psi,mesons,baryons,calorons Bose-Einstein Condensation -> confinement EoS Flux tubes-> RHIC data Hydrodynamics Molecular dynamics Monopoles Transport properties, Entropy generation Plasma physics E/M duality Collective modes Energy loss, Mach cones AdS/CFT duality Gauge theories, SUSY models Black hole physics, String theory

  4. The only hydro slide (P.Kolb) • 3 stages take about the same time at RHIC; • QGP, ``mixed phase”, hadronic phase • News is that mixed phase= magnetic plasma

  5. Deconfinement and Electric-magnetic fight/competition in sQGP . “Magnetic plasma” monopoles and dyons Assumed dominant at 0.9<T< 1.5Tc

  6. Magnetic objects and their dynamics: classics • ‘t Hooft and Polyakov discovered monopoles in Non-Abelian gauge theories • ‘t Hooft and Mandelstamm suggested “dual superconductor” mechanism for confinement • Seiberg and Witten shown that it does work in N=2 Super YangMills theory

  7. Recent developments • Liao+ES; running coupling => magnetic liquid near Tc • Chernodub+Zakharov=> high monopole density near Tc, e-3p from monopoles • D’Ellia+D’Alessandro => monopole density and spatial correlators • Liao+ES => correlators are the same as in the Coulomb liquid

  8. Liao,ES hep-ph/0611131 electric/magnetic couplings (e/g) run in the opposite directions! s(electric) s(magnetic)=1 Old good Dirac condition (in QED-type units e2= s) s(el) at the e=g “equilibrium line” s(el)=s(mag)=1 (the best liquid there?) s(mag) monopoles must get sufficently weakly coupled before BEC= deconfinement, also they are much lighter/denser than gluons/quarks =>s(mag) smaller thans(el) how small can s(mag)be?

  9. Electric and magnetic screening from the lattice Nakamura et al, 2004 arrow shows the ``self-dual” E=M point Me<Mm Magnetic Dominated At T=0 magnetic Screening mass Is about 2 GeV (de Forcrand et al) (a glueball mass) (Other lattice data -Karsch et al- show how Me Vanishes at Tc better) Me>Mm Electrric dominated ME/T=O(g) ES 78 MM/T=O(g^2) Polyakov 79 Why is QGP getting magnetic as T=>Tc?

  10. Strong coupling regime in plasma physics: Gamma= <|Epot|>/<Ekin> >>1gas => liquid => solid • Strongly compressed matter inside Jupiter etc when electrons gets collective • ``dusty plasmas’ at International Space Station • This is of course for +/- Abelian charges, • But ``green” and ``anti-green” quarks do the same! • local order would be preserved in a liquid also, • as it is in molten solts (strongly coupled TCP with • <pot>/<kin>=O(60), about 3-10 in sQGP)

  11. Gelman,ES,Zahed,nucl-th/0601029 With a non-Abelian color => Wong eqn Gas, liquid solid

  12. Lattice SU(2) gauge theory, monopoles found and followed by Min.Ab.gauge DeTar 1980’s, Kanazawa and ITEP group… • x-Correlations • give Coulomb like MM potential • First lattice sighting of a liquid! Recent results +- monopole density strongly grows as T=> Tc ++

  13. Our MD for 50-50 MQP/EQP

  14. s(electric) and s(magnetic)do run in opposite directions! • Squares: fitted magnetic coupling, circles: its inverse compared to asymptotic freedom (dashed) • Effective plasma parameter (here for magnetic) • So, the monopoles are never really weakly coupled!

  15. V=F+TS ``potential energy” V(r,T) from Bielefeld/BNL lattice group (Karsch…) • ``tension” nearly 5 times that at T=0 (black line)

  16. Two potentials - two tensions

  17. two types of flux tubes • Stable with supercurrent (no dissipation), • metastable with normal current

  18. F=slow=all level crossing,V=F+TS fast=no level crossing (ES+Zahed,03) • Landau-Zener formula (1932),for transition when 2 levels are crossing with the velocity v12 • Creation of metastable flux tube is possible at and even above Tc

  19. We solve ellipsoidal bags with 2 charges at focal points • ``bag constant” related to potential at any T • This constant is made of two components, condenced and uncondeced monopoles

  20. Condences monopoles <=F

  21. Uncondenced monopoles <= V Direct observation of MAG monopoles wrapping around lattice (time)

  22. dE/dx=V <= Energy loss • v2=<cos2phi> • Nobody was able to get so large v2 if absorbtion is proportional to density • But we do ! • So main dE/dx seems to be near Tc?

  23. So why are collisions so often in sQGP making it the best liquid? Because of magnetic bottle effect: static eDipole+MPS Note that Lorentz force is O(v)! + E+ M V E- - Monopole rotates around the electric field line, bouncing off both charges (whatever the sign)

  24. Indeed, collisions are much more frequent than in cascades two chargesplay ping-pong with a monopole without even moving! Dual to Budker’s magnetic bottle

  25. MD simulation for novel plasma containing both charges and monopoles (Liao,ES hep-ph/0611131)monopole admixture up to M50=50% , 1000 particles, numerically solveddiffusion decreases indefinitely, viscosity does not 50-50 mixture makes the best liquid, as it creates ``maximal trapping”

  26. short transport summarylog(inverse viscosity s/eta)- vs. log(inverse heavy q diffusion const D*2piT) (avoids messy discussion of couplings) ->Stronger coupled -> • RHIC data: very small viscosity and diffusion • vs theory - AdS/CFT and our MD Most perfect liquid 4pi MD results, with specified monopole fraction Weak coupling end => (Perturbative results shown here) Both related to mean free path 50-50% E/M is the most ideal liquid

  27. Understanding monopole dynamics further • Chernodub,V.Zakharov … monopole percolation on the lattice, monopole contribution to e-3p, etc • Claudia Ratti+ES: Higgsing<L(T)> for g,q, tHooft-Polyakov monopoles +lattice data (e.g n(mon,T)) =>masses of q,g,m and s(el,T),s(mag,T) • Marco Cristoforetti +ES: Bose-condensation in strongly interacting liquids => Monopole mass at Tc from Feynman condition

  28. Bose-Einstein condensation of strongly interacting particles(with M.Cristoforetti,now TU Munich) • Feynman theory polygon jumps BEC if ∆S(jump)<Sc (=1.65 for ideal gas, 1.44 from combinatorics of polygons • if used for He4 Tc=3.5K not 2.17 as observed) d • We calculated ``instantons” for particles jumping paths in a liquid and • solid He4 incuding realistic atomic potentials and confirmed by quantum 1-body path int. with/without permutations numerically, to refine conditions when BEC transitions take place Jumping paths: Feynman, interacting Liquid He4 is superfluid, But solid He4 is NOT supersolid,why? <= interacting stronger because of a bit higher density

  29. <=Potential in He4the whole row moves by a=>delta S/atom

  30. BEC (confinement) condition for monopoles For charged Bose gas (monopoles) the action for the jump can be calculated similarly, but relativistically; jumps in space d and in time Comparable) ∆S=M sqrt(d^2+(1/Tc)^2)+ ∆S(interaction) = Sc =1.44 provides the monopole mass M at Tc M Tc approx 1.5 => M(monopoles) as low as 200 MeV (to be compared to 600-800 MeV for q,g and 1 gev for dyons)

  31. QGP= strongly coupled liquid with record low eta/s, diffusion, large dE/dx Large density of ``normal” (non-Bose-condensed) monopoles near Tc may be the reason (Is it also true in quasi-conformal regime T>2Tc? LHC will tell) Two tensions => two flux tubes => two components of the monopole ensemble, condenced and uncondenced This is the region where electric/magnetic couplings cross 1 Magnetic component is also a liquid! the “most perfect liquid” (because of the magnetic-bottle trapping) for 50-50% electric/magnetic plasma RHIC data on transport (dE/dx, eta/s,D), ADS/CFT and electric/magnetic QGP qualitatively agree! But why? Conclusions

  32. reserve

  33. Do we have Higgsing (<A0>) in QCD at T>Tc in AA collisions? <= its evolution is quite slow • At RHIC the QGP lifetime is about 5 fm/c • (Same for ``mixed phase, same for hadronic)

More Related