1 / 17

The Myth of Evidence B ased P olicy

The Myth of Evidence B ased P olicy. Robin Davidson SSA. York 2013. Thanks. Staff of ALRUK. Particularly James Nicholls Willm Mistral

pink
Download Presentation

The Myth of Evidence B ased P olicy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Myth of Evidence Based Policy Robin Davidson SSA. York 2013

  2. Thanks • Staff of ALRUK. • Particularly James Nicholls • Willm Mistral • Davidson, R (2013 ) Evidenced based alcohol policy : not as simple as it sounds. In Mistral, W (ed). Substance Misuse; Emerging Perspectives. Wiley Blackwell. London

  3. Definition of EBP • Linear and direct selection, synthesis and critical evaluation of best research evidence to answer a policy problem and which can then be implemented Greenlagh and Russell (2009)

  4. To begin with • Evidence based practice? • Dearth of evidence? • Introverted scientists? • The sabotaging industry?

  5. How to invent a new therapy 1. Start with an established psychological process of change 2. Add functionally trivial bells and whistles 3. Demonstrate using one RCT that the “new” treatment is statistically (P< .05) better than no treatment or TAU 4. Give “new” treatment a name and acronym 5. Patent it • Set up accreditation process and retire to the South of France. Davidson (2008) “The central goal of psychotherapy research should be to achieve an understanding of the psychological mechanisms or processes of change and not focus on brand name treatments”

  6. In the last year……. • Office of National Statistics • Health and Social Care Information Centre • Health Survey England • Chief Medical Officer • World Health Organisation • EU Alcohol Health Forum • OECD • Department of Health • Home Office • HMRC • Scottish Government • NHS Scotland / MESAS • British Beer and Pub Association • Institute of Fiscal Studies • Centre for Economic and Business Research • Scottish Health Action on Alcohol Problems • Alcohol Focus Scotland • Balance North East • Alcohol Research UK • AMPHORA • EUCAM • Eurocare • Institute of Alcohol Studies • Local Government Association • Greater London Authority • Alcohol Concern • University of Stirling / Alcohol Health Alliance • Ofcom • RAND Europe • The Adam Smith Institute • Demos • Mentor UK

  7. The Statisticians TaleHome Office Data Analyst. : I could call up data that could prove anything I wanted to. If I want to make a case that is really good ....using proper data I can manipulate it to make it look pretty. Similarly, if I wanted to placepressure on the Home Office to support us with an initiative I could put my hands on data that would do just that. So numbers do whatever you want. ... Don’t all partnerships do that.?

  8. The Journalists TaleA.A. Gill. Sun Times. May 24th 2009 There is an academic assumption that all research is a good thing and that all knowledge gleaned from research is of equal importance as every shard in a mosaic. This is of course empirical bollocks. Most research is forgotten and an awful lot is utterly pointless and has more to do with the search for funding, career building and hierarchies than it does with uncovering and thereby righting the world

  9. Ducks in a row in 1997 • New Labour elected. • Tony Blairs public commitment to “New Public Management” and that “evidence based solutions should drive policy”. • David Blunket “information and knowledge at the heart of policy making and delivery”. • Gus O’Donnell appointed cabinet secretary

  10. Maybe four reasons for the Myth • The structure of government • The psychology of decision makers • The assumptions of “naïve rationalism” • The spirit of the times

  11. The structure of Government • Departmental Pluralism resulting in conflicting and multiple outcomes • Short term, adversarial, ideological splityet marketing pragmatists, • Yes minister • Career politicians, ambitious,

  12. Cognitive dysfunction in politicians • Primacy effect • Confirmation bias (favour of evidence that confirms beliefs) • Belief perseverance (beliefs persist after evidence for them has shown to be false) And what about civil servants…………

  13. Naïve rationalism • What works trumps desirable ends and appropriate means? • Values - whose likely benefits worth whose potential losses • What about embodied knowledge (Praxis) • There is no such thing as a body of evidence. Rather competing constructions able to support any position. • Collective deliberation. policy is language, argumentation, discourse and incremental decision making

  14. Spirit of the times • Beerhouse act-1830 • Industrial revolution- trading imperatives • mid 19thC -moral issues • Late Victorian-social reform • 1915 – national industrial efficiency. • 1960s - health • 1990s – tourism • Now- youthful public disorder (MUP)

  15. Not new-Aristotle • Logos; the argument • Ethos; the speaker • Pathos; emotional • Coming from; understanding the audience.

  16. Recent Schemes • March 2013 What Works Evidence Centres • Out of 70 programmes implemented by the DoE 2 were evaluated. Lead to the Education Endowment Foundation. • The BehaviouralInsights Team • Trial Design Advisory Panel – Ben Goldacre. • Project Oracle leading to a standard of evidence framework. • Policy Skills Framework launched by the institute for Government

  17. The End robindavidson@hotmail.co.uk Alcohol Research UK Willow House, 4th Floor 17 - 23 Willow Place LONDON SW1P 1JH Tel 020 7821 7880

More Related