450 likes | 854 Views
Environmental Quality. Environmental quality is improved and protected via proactive and reactive measures:Proactive Prevention of degradation and conservation Tools
E N D
2. Environmental quality is improved and protected via proactive and reactive measures:
Proactive
Prevention of degradation and conservation
Tools – Strategic Planning, Environmental Impact Assessment.
Reactive
Rehabilitation of degraded areas, Reduction of emissions and effluent, clean-up
Tools – NEMA sector Acts, Water legislation, Compliance and Enforcement.
3. Systematic process to identify potential positive and negative impacts on the environment (biophysical, socio-economic, cultural) associated with proposed activity.
Examine alternatives / management measures to minimise negative and optimise positive consequences.
Prevent substantial detrimental to the environment
4. Advantages of EIA
To authorities:
Informed decision making;
Improvement / protection of environmental quality;
Management to sustainable utilisation of resources;
Understanding demands on bulk services, waste management services, urban forms, etc.
5. Advantages of EIA (cont)
To interested and affected parties
An opportunity to be heard;
Protecting environmental rights;
Utilisation of local and indigenous knowledge;
Increased knowledge and environmental awareness
6. Advantages of EIA (cont)
To developers of identified activities:
Proactively asking the right questions
Adequacy of natural resources
Risks associated with environmental factors (geologic stability, hydrology regimes, fire, etc)
Pollution potential and prevention thereof;
Energy and water saving and associated financial savings
Appropriateness of activity in terms of strategic planning for the area
7. EIA in its design is aimed at informing project planning and design – unfortunately, often used to justify what is already planned instead.
9. EIA became law in 1997, before then, voluntary use of EIA.
Concurrent function between national and provincial government.
Survey conducted amongst all provinces during March 2006 to establish status quo of SA EIA System
13. The provinces received a total of 43 423 applications for EIA authorisation between September 1997 and March 2006.
Of these applications 35 536 have been finalised and 3 097 withdrawn.
This means that at least 4 790 applications are still current
These current applications fall into three categories:
Dormant applications – where authorities await action from the applicant
Applications awaiting authority action – still within reasonable time frames
Backlog – applications awaiting action and being delayed by authorities
14. Whilst approximately 50% of applications are finalised within 6 months from the application date and an additional 33% within a year, it is of concern that approximately 9% is only finalised within a period of 2 years or more
Although often related to complexity, controversy and pollution potential, delay in review and decision making processes also in cases due to severe capacity constraints within provincial authorities
16. Lessons learnt through implementation of the 1997 EIA Regulations and evolution of Environmental Legislation since 1997 necessitated the review of the EIA System.
17. Inadequacies of 1997 Regulations include.
Wide interpretation of activities resulting in inconsistent application by authorities
To many small scale / insignificant activities made subject to EIA
Lengthy and inflexible process, with to many “authority stops” / “decision points”
Inadequate provisions for public consultation
Not supported by strategic planning tools
Enforcement measures generally weak
The Review commenced in 2000 and resulted in the promulgation of new Regulations in terms of the NEMA during April 2006
19. What has been retained but improved? …
24. What is new …
25. New additions Exclusions based on
Policies and guidelines
Environmental Management Frameworks
Compliance and enforcement strengthened
Regulation 6 allowing for cooperation agreements between authorities
Site Environmental Management Plans structured
Class applications
26. Environmental Management Frameworks
27. Environmental Management Framework Regulations prescribe process for compiling EMF and set minimum requirements for content
Strategic tool where a geographical area is assessed:
Status quo study in terms of inter alia biophysical environment, built environment and “planned” environment
Desired state of environment defined
Road map established to reach and maintain desired SOE
28. EMF consist of “environmental control zones”; environmental management plan and environmental management policy
Certain pre-determined activities when aligned with control zones, EMP and EM Policy are then excluded from EIA requirements
EMF also useful as environmental input into SDF’s, precinct plans, etc.
29. Sector guidelines
30. Sector guidelines Regulations prescribe process for compiling and publication of Sector guidelines
Sector guidelines are given teeth – applicants have to take it into consideration
Sector guidelines can also be used for exclusions
31. Class applications
32. Class applications One application and process for many different activities occurring in one geographical area
OR
One application and process for the same activity type proposed to take place in different locations
33. The processes and time frames associated with it
34. Basic Assessment Process
35. Activities contained in Listing Notice 1 are subject to a basic assessment process
Smaller scale activities
Predicted impacts are generally known and can be easily managed
Will be further limited through exclusions
37. Scoping and EIA process (thorough process)
38. Activities contained in Listing Notice 2 are subject to a thorough assessment process
Activities that due to nature and/or extent is likely to have significant impacts
Associated with high levels of pollution / waste / environmental degradation
Impacts cannot easily be predicted
Higher risk activities
42. NEMA EIA Regulations will come into effect for all activities except for those related to mining permits, licenses and permission will come into effect on 1 July 2006
Mining related activities will come into effect on 1 April 2007 due to
Required law reform
Development of cooperation structures and systems
System reform
Transitional arrangements provided for EIA processes currently underway in terms of 1997 EIA Regulations
43. In conclusion…
44. After lengthy consultative process, NEMA EIA Regulations finally ready to come into force and start making a difference.
All the benefits of the new Regulations will not be immediately evident.
We must be more realistic about appropriateness of IEM Tools and urgently develop other tools to supplement, complement and in some cases, replace EIA.
Where more strategic approaches can be used, this should be explored and good quality base information is essential for this.
45. Thank you