Examining Relationships Between Teacher Behaviors and Parent Engagement

1. Examining Relationships Between Teacher Behaviors and Parent Engagement Allison Osborn, Kelly Rasmussen, Kathryn Woods, Susan Sheridan & Lisa Knoche University of Nebraska – Lincoln National Association of School Psychologists Annual Meeting, 2009

2. Importance of Early Environments • Parent’s are a child’s first teachers and the importance of parent involvement in a child’s education is well-documented (Henderson & Mapp, 2002; Sheridan, Clarke, Knoche, Edwards, 2006). • The earliest environments experienced by children are significant in how young children view relationships and in turn, how they relate with peers and adults (Dunst & Bruder, 1999; Guralnick & Neville, 1997). • Among the developmental contexts that predict outcomes for young children, those related to the family and child-rearing environment are most critical (Englund et al., 2004; Lamb-Parker et al., 1999; Molfese et al., 2001).

3. Parent Engagement For the purpose of this study, we are defining Parent Engagement as: Actively displays an interest in participating in educational activities Discusses meaningful issues concerning the child and family with educational professionals Initiates and elaborates on topics of discussion Asks questions or provides information to the teacher, or early childhood professional (ECP) related to the topic of discussion Engagement also includes the level to which parents display enthusiasm, effort, and satisfaction with an intervention experience.

4. Parent Engagement When parents are engaged in intervention services, improvements are observed in parenting skills and knowledge, parent-child interactions, and beliefs about one’s ability as a caregiver (Charlop-Christy & Carpenter, 2000; Swick & Hassel, 1990). Linking engagement strategies to the delivery of high quality treatments has been shown to increase the potential long-term impact of effective treatments for children and families (Dishion & Stormshak, 2007; Hoagwood, 2005).

5. Parent-Child Relationships • Quality parent-child interactions have also been shown to lead to positive parent-child relationships. • A positive parent-child relationship includes parental display of warmth, encouragement, support, positive reinforcement and support for children’s autonomy (Parker et al, 1999; Hirch-Pasek & Burchinal, 2006). • Numerous studies have highlighted how a mother’s interaction style promotes child development. • Sensitive mothers are more likely to have babies that form secure attachments (Bus & van ljzendoorn, 1988, 1992, 1997, as cited in Clingenpeel & Pianta, 2007). • Infants with responsive mothers are able to explore their environment independently, requesting parental assistance when needed (Coyl, Roggman, & Newland, 2002).

6. Parent-Teacher Relationships Parent-teacher relationships consist of strong, committed, reciprocal, trusting interactions over time between parents and teachers. Relationships between parents and other adults responsible for the child’s learning and development are important for establishing experiences that are consistent, coherent, and coordinated as children move between home and community (school) settings. (Christenson & Sheridan, 2001)

7. Parent-Teacher Relationships Triadic (McCollum & Yates, 1994) and collaborative consultation (Sheridan & Kratochwill, 2008) are two models that promote parent engagement. Each model has a specific set of strategies used by teachers to: Promote parent-child engagement (triadic) Promote parent-teacher engagement (collaborative)

8. Intervention for Families At-Risk Given the importance of parent engagement for parent, teacher and child relationships, and child outcomes, early intervention is a critical step for at-risk families Head Start

9. Getting Ready Project • The Getting Ready Project is a five-year, federally funded, longitudinal study which is designed to promote triadic/collaborative partnerships between parents and early childhood teachers. • This project has partnered with early childhood teachers in Head Start settings to assist in promoting parent strengths, competencies, engagement with child, and children’s healthy development through comprehensive, evidence-based family-centered services. • Parent engagement with child (i.e., warmth & sensitivity, support for autonomy, participation in child learning) and with teachers (i.e., collaborative interactions and planning) is an additional focus of the intervention program. • Although preliminary research has examined the relationship between teachers’ use of triadic/collaborative strategies and child outcomes, research has yet to investigate the relationship between teachers’ use of triadic/collaborative strategies, parent-professional relationships, and parent engagement during home visits.

10. Research Question • Do teachers’ use of triadic/collaborative strategies during home visits relate to parent engagement during home visit activities? • What is the relationship between strategy use and parents (a) rate of interaction with the child and (b) quality of parent engagement with the child? • What is the relationship between strategy use and parents (a) rate of interaction with the teacher and (b) quality of parent engagement with the teacher?

11. Methods

12. SampleTable 1Demographic Information

13. Table 1 continuedDemographic Information

14. Table 1 continuedDemographic Information

15. Procedure • Children and parents recruited for this investigation are involved in the Getting Ready Project. • Teachers visit family homes five times throughout the school year. • Two sessions are videotaped and reliably coded for frequency of collaborative and triadic strategies and overall parent engagement.

16. Strategies for Teachers/Professionals • Establishing & re-establishing a relationship • Asking parents to share observations & ideas • Affirming parents’ competence • Establishing a dyadic context • Helping prioritize concerns/needs • Focusing attention on child’s strengths • Provide developmental information • Brainstorming • Making suggestions • Promoting interaction through modeling • Helping plan for future goals (McCollum & Yates, 1994; Sheridan, Knoche, Marvin, & Edwards, 2008)

17. Procedures • Parents provided demographic information for themselves, their children, and their families • Teacher strategy use was coded using a 60-second partial interval recording procedure (Home Visit Observation Definition Guide; McBride & Peterson, 1997); • Parents’ rate of interaction with child was coded using a 60-second partial interval recording procedure • Parents’ quality of engagement with the child was coded every 10 minutes of interaction on a Likert scale (1=low, 4=high) • Parents’ rate of interaction with teacher was coded using a 60-second partial interval recording procedure • Parents’ quality of engagement with the teacher was coded every 10 minutes of interaction on a Likert scale (1=low, 4=high)

18. Analyses and Results

19. Analyses • Correlational analyses were conducted: • To examine the relationship between strategy use and parents’ rate of interaction with the child and the quality of parent engagement with the child. • To examine the relationship between strategy use and parents’ rate of interaction with the teacher and quality of parent engagement with the teacher.

20. Table 3Pearson Correlations * p <.05 ** p<.01

21. Results • No relationship was found between strategy use and parent’s rate of interaction with the child • A significant positive relationship was found between strategy use and the quality of parent engagement with the child • A significant positive relationship was found between strategy use and parent’s rate of interaction with the teacher • A significant positive relationship was found between strategy use and of quality of parent engagement with the teacher

22. Discussion • Teacher’s strategy use was not related to parent’s rate of interaction with the child • Teacher’s strategy use was related to parent’s quality of engagement with the child • Although quality of parent-child engagement was related to teacher’s strategy use and the rate of parent-child engagement, the mechanism for these relationships is unknown.

23. Discussion Teachers strategy use was related to parent quality of engagement and the rate of interaction with the teacher Parent may view home visits as an opportunity to interact and discuss pertinent issues with their child’s teacher outside of the school environment This time may also be viewed as an opportunity for both parties to share information in a reciprocal manner to enhance the child’s development

24. Limitations • Effectiveness of strategy use is not coded • For the purposes of this study, amount of strategy use was investigated. • Family characteristics were not controlled but likely influenced rate of interaction and quality of parent engagement. • Rate and quality are not independent of each other for both parent-child and parent-teacher variables.

25. Future Directions • Assess teachers’ strategy use over time • Examine relationships between overall parent engagement and • Relationships with teachers • Parent’s self-efficacy • Parental involvement in school • Assess the quality of implementation, or teacher effectiveness

26. Implications for School Psychologists • Importance of family involvement outside of school • Importance of attachment and engagement • Early intervention • Importance of parents having fun with their children!

27. For More Information • Susan Sheridan: ssheridan2@unl.edu • Lisa Knoche: lknoche2@unl.edu • Allison Osborn: allison.osborn@huskers.unl.edu • Kelly Rasmussen: kelrasmussen@hotmail.com • Katie Woods: kwoods@huskers.unl.edu This research is supported by a grant awarded to Drs. Susan Sheridan and Carolyn Pope Edwards by the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) -- National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), Administration for Children and Families (ACF) and Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (ASPE); and the Department of Education (DOE) -- Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services. The opinions expressed herein are those of the investigators and do not reflect the funding agencies (GRANT # 1R01H00436135).

28. References • Charlop-Christy, M. H., & Carpenter, M. (2000). Modified incidental teaching sessions: A procedure for parents to increase spontaneous speech in their children with autism. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 2, 98–112. • Clingenpeel, B., & Pianta, R. (2007). Mothers’ sensitivity and book-reading interactions with first graders. Early Education and Development, 18, 1-22. • Coyl, D. D., Roggman, L. A., & Newland, L. A. (2002). Stress, maternal depression, and negative mother-infant interactions in relation to infant attachment. Infant Mental Health Journal, 23, 145-163. • Dishion, T., & Stormshak, E. (2007). Intervening in children's lives: An ecological approach to family-centered intervention. Washington DC: APA Publishing. • Dunst, C.J., & Bruder, M.B. (1999). Increasing children's learning opportunities in the context of family and community life. Children's Learning Opportunities, Report, 1. • Englund, M., Luckner,A., & Whaley, G. (2004). Children's achievement in early elementary school: Longitudinal effects of parental involvement, expectations, and quality of assistance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 723-730. • Guralnick, M., & Neville, B. (1997) Designing early intervention programs to promote children's social competence. In M. Guralnick (Ed.), The Effectiveness of Early Intervention (579-610). Baltimore: Brookes.

29. References • Henderson, A. T., & Mapp, K. L. (2002). A new wave of evidence: The impact of school, family, and community connections on student achievement. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory, National Center for Family & Community Connections with Schools. • Hirch-Pasek, K. & Burchinal, M. (2006). Mother and caregiver sensitivity over time: Predicting language and academic outcomes with variable- and person-centered approaches. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 52, 449-485. • Hoagwood, K. E. (2005). Family-based services in children’s mental health: A research review and synthesis. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46, 690-713. • Lamb-Parker, F., Boak, A Y., Griffin, K. W., Ripple, C., & Peay, L. (1999). Parent-child relationship, home learning environment, and school readiness. School Psychology Review, 28, 413-425. • McCollum, J. A., & Yates, T. J. (1994). Technical assistance for meeting early intervention personnel standards: Statewide processes based on peer review. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 14, 295-310.

30. References • Molfese, V., Molfese, D., & Modgline, A. (2001). Newborn and preschool predictors of second-grade reading scores: An evaluation of categorical and continuous scores. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 545-554. • Parker, F., Boak, A., & Griffin, K. (1999). Parent-child relationship, home learning environment, and school readiness. School Psychology Review, 28(3), 413-425. • Sheridan, S., Marvin, C., Knoche, L. & Edwards, C. (2008). Getting Ready: Promoting school readiness through a relationship-based partnership model. Early Childhood Services. • Sheridan, S. & Kratochwill, T. (2008). Behavioral parent- teacher consultation: Conceptual and research considerations. Journal of School Psychology, 30(2), 117-139. • Sheridan, S. M., Clarke, B. L., Knoche, L. L., & Edwards, C. P. (2006). The effects of conjoint behavioral consultation in early childhood settings. Early Education and Development, 17, 593-617. • Swick, K., & Hassell, T. (1990). Parental efficacy and the development of social competence in young children. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 17, 24-32.