1 / 8

The Affordances of Wikis for Enabling Group Work by Pre-Service Teachers

The Affordances of Wikis for Enabling Group Work by Pre-Service Teachers. Kay Owens SOTE, Dubbo. Affordances. Mediating tool Extend thinking Provides alternatives Enables inquiry Extension of thinking ( Goos , Galbraith, Renshaw & Geiger, 2003)

Download Presentation

The Affordances of Wikis for Enabling Group Work by Pre-Service Teachers

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Affordances of Wikis for Enabling Group Work by Pre-Service Teachers Kay Owens SOTE, Dubbo

  2. Affordances • Mediating tool • Extend thinking • Provides alternatives • Enables inquiry • Extension of thinking (Goos, Galbraith, Renshaw & Geiger, 2003) • Action is possible as a result of the availability of the tool (Dalgarno & Lee, 2010)

  3. Affordances in Collaborative Community of Inquiry • Focus of discussion • Movement into Zone of Proximal Development • Promoting action • Mutual engagement of participants • Shared repertoire and experience for meaning making • Screen movements, reasoning, problem solving together – changes in tool and in their thinking go together

  4. Lecturer role • Facilitation with tool • Freedom • Early face-to-face and mutual trust • Learning design itself as an affordance: cycle of perception and action in a classroom context • Design to work together through computer tool • http://interact.csu.edu.au/portal/site/EML105_201130_D_I/page/e65ed710-ec30-467f-8024-c09c8ad9f34e

  5. Subject use of computers • Students set up own project site • Learn to use wikis. Work in wikis with grammar and other statements as a group in the tutorial for 6 weeks. Other group work. • Interactive links to reading (short) hyperlinked, relatively precise question, built up to the assessment essay • Work on paper usually in maths but reflections in wiki; non-computer activities • Student services support and lecturer in room • http://interact.csu.edu.au/access/meleteDocs/content/private/meleteDocs/EML105_201130_D_I/uploads/EML105LitWeek3.htm • http://interact.csu.edu.au/access/meleteDocs/content/private/meleteDocs/EML105_201130_D_I/uploads/EML105NumS1-1.htm

  6. Student self-determined use • Often used 2 computers, one for the module and other for joint writing • Next six weeks, had own paper to read and write up something on the wiki for sharing and comment • Self-regulating with cognitive and affective processes within a social context • http://interact.csu.edu.au/portal/site/2f026f15-28bc-4141-00cf-af22d4b02e6b • http://interact.csu.edu.au/portal/site/ef3fc9ed-ff8e-46e9-8052-f875701b5c2c/page/1eeb7b4a-2574-4092-8054-284ff2223353

  7. Third year subject • More difficult readings to summarise and required to respond to other comments • Set up face-to-face. • Linked to assessment seemed less responsive. • http://interact.csu.edu.au/portal/site/15332c71-da67-479a-802b-b25a5a5f2c0c

  8. Affordances & Constraints • Supporting each other reasonably well in class – important because of a wide range of background knowledge on grammar & maths • Relatively easy to see who is putting comments in or modifying; sometimes done as group so need to encourage they note this • Confined space for some • If assessed, did not want to put down thoughts as final submission. If not assessed, less input from everyone. • Some were unsure how the work would help assessment, or seen as double work, or selfish about sharing work (grading is competitive).

More Related