150 likes | 213 Views
Learn how to implement Data Quality Requirements (DQR) for improved safety in AIS operations and ensure compliance with EC Regulations. This detailed guide covers roles, coordination issues, mechanisms, and key points for effective implementation.
E N D
IMPLEMENTING DQR A Practical View Danijela Maksimovic CAD Republic of Serbia 19 February 2013
EC Regulation 552/2004 (Interoperability) EC Regulation 73/2010 (ADQ IR) Data Quality Requirements (DQR) Specification Data Assurance Level (DAL) Specification Article 6 (1) Annex IV Part A Article 6 (2) Annex IV Part B DQR Specification
Advantages • Combines requirements from different ICAO • Annexes • Brings safety to AIS into more details • Connects with DAL Specification • Annex C can be used in oversight process
Article 2 (2) of ADQ IR: • ANSPs • Aerodrome and heliport operators • Surveying companies • Electronic terrain and obstacle data providers • Procedure designers Parties involved
State Role (general) • Represents users community • To adopt DQR Specification as MoC for ADQ IR • To regulate compliance with DQR HL • To coordinate all the requirements among relevant • State entities (interested parties) • To communicate externally (ICAO, other States, • EUROCONTROL)
State Role (detailed 1) • To adopt DQR Specification • To ensure compliance of ANSP(s) with DQR HL • To ensure compliance of other entities with DQR HL • (recommended) • To inform EUROCONTROL on differences • To cover insufficient requirements • To validate DQRs within national context
State Role (detailed 2) • Maintenance of DQR HL: • Changes supported by safety assessment • Internal and external consultations • Proposal for the modification communicated to EUROCONTROL • Periodical checks of DQR Specification
All data users concerned • Expectations from non-aviation • entities (eTOD providers) • Oversight of all the activities • Continuous process (maintenance and revision) • Revision of existing (?) formal arrangements Coordination issues – internal
EAD conformance with • DQR Specification • Mechanisms for external • coordination • Level of detail with regard to ICAO non-compliance Coordination issues – external
Safety issues • Safety in relation to aeronautical data/information • AISP staff not safety-trained • Safety assessment carried on by AISP staff or other • (ATM, CNS and/or SAF) ANSP experts? • Provision and use of data via EAD • Special attention must be paid to data with multiple • use
Existence of supporting regulatory framework • Use of safety-related experiences from other ANSs • (ATM, CNS) • Training requirements for AISP and other staff • Awareness campaign (WSs, Meetings) • Compliance Checklists • Enforcement of formal arrangements Mechanisms - internal
Rely on available guidelines and methodologies • Share experiences and best practices among States • Public consultations • Assess the need for cross-border • coordination Mechanisms - external
Management of coordination between States • Exchanging experiences (WSs) • Training for AISP staff (safety) • EAD-related issues Need for external support?
Summary • Higher level of data quality requirements vs • treatment of differences • Key point: coordination – internal and external • Safety in the context of AIS operations • Need for management of coordination among • States (EUROCONTROL?)