240 likes | 255 Views
Discover the latest proposals and applications in CIDOC CRM for ancient text interpretation, including writing systems, text segmentation, and reading events. Explore the unique relationship between text and support in antiquity.
E N D
CRMtex Updates Achille Felicetti – Francesca Murano Università degli Studi di Firenze, Italy
CRMtex updates • First draft available on CIDOC CRM website (Proposal for approval) • Scope notes for classes and properties • Application examples • http://www.cidoc-crm.org/crmtex/ • Previous publications: • A. Felicetti, F. Murano, P. Ronzino, F. Niccolucci: CIDOC CRM and Epigraphy: a Hermeneutic Challenge, EMF-CRM@ TPDL, 2015, http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1656/paper5.pdf • A. Felicetti, F. Murano, Scripta manent: a CIDOC CRM semiotic reading of ancient texts, Int. Journal of Digital Libraries, 2017 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-016-0189-z • Revision and harmonisation with other models (FRBRoo/LRMoo)
Background: a quick overview • An “Ancient Text” • Is a “document” bearing a text (!!) • Is the product of manual work rather than a mechanised process (as in modern printing) • Special relationship between the text and its support • Uniqueness of the text Even in case of texts written by same person on identical media and with an identical technique the resulting copies are never identical • Mechanised process in antiquity: coins, medal stamps, seals • Close relation between text and support still important
The meaning of “ancient text” • Physical manifestation • A set of physical features on a given support, produced through the use of specific techniques • Scribbled with ink, painted, engraved etc. • Abstract dimension • Set of concepts represented by the same physical features • “Writing” • A sophisticated human technology allowing the encoding of a text in a specific language through series (or sequences) of signs specifically selected for this purpose
Texts and interpretation • We consider a text as a “semiotic feature”, anumber of signs physically traced on a support and intended to encode a linguistic expression • The intentionality is fundamental to define a text • Only in this case we speak of written communication
Glyphs and Graphemes • The signs used to encode / decode the message (e.g. the letters) are the concrete expressions (physical features - glyphs) of conceptual and conventional elements a linguistic community choses to encode its language (graphemes) A a a a A
Written Text and Writing Event • TX1 Written Text. Subclass of E25 Man-Made Feature intended to describe a particular feature (i.e., ‘set of glyphs’) created (i.e., written) on various kinds of support, having semiotic significance and the declared purpose of conveying a specific message towards a given recipient or group of recipients • TX2 Writing. Subclass of E12 Production indicating the activity of creating textual entities using various techniques (painting, sculpture, etc.) and by means of specific tools on a given physical carrier in a non-mechanical way
Writing Systems • TX3 Writing System. Subclass of E29 Design or Procedure, refers to a conventional system (e.g., the Greek alphabet) consisting of a set of characters (graphemes, E90 ) used to codify a natural language. A writing system can be used to notate different natural languages, by means of specific rules in the combination and phonological value assignment of the chosen graphemes. It is used to produce a TX1 Written Text through a TX2 Writing event
Writing Field • TX4 Writing Field. Subclass of E25 Man-Made Feature, usually understood as the surface or por- tion of the physical carrier reserved, delimited and arranged for the purpose of accommodating a writ- ten text, to highlight and isolate it from the other parts of the object to which it belongs, to enhance and guarantee its readability • Fundamental in Epigraphy (Epigraphicfield) • Distinction between area(s) containing written text and empty parts of the support (margins, intercolumnia, etc.) • Significant for the definition of styles and periods of the document Epigraphic Field
Reading Event • TX5 Reading. Subclass of the CRMsci S4 Observation class, referring to the scientific autoptic examination of the document and constituting the first action required in preparation for its study. It consists of an accurate analysis of the surface and the signs and prescribes the use of specific tools and procedures, to establishing as faithfully as possible the exact value of each sign drawn on the physical feature
Transcription Event • TX6 Transcription. Subclass of E7 Activity, referring to the activity of re-writing the text conducted by an editor. This operation, in some cases, involves a writing system (TX3 ) different from that of the original text (e.g., Latin characters to render a Coptic text); this results in a re-encoding of the text itself and, from a linguistic point of view, it is indicated more properly as a ‘transliteration’, because it implies a 1 : 1 relation between the signs of the two writing systems
Text and Text Segments • Segmentation of the text has various purposes: • 1. To describe the layout of the text (columns, pages, etc.) • Decided by the writer during a TX2 Writing event for communication • 2. To describe the the material condition of a part of the text • Operated by scholars during a TX5 Reading event for study • Related to the physical feature scholars observe ( TX1 Written Text) • 3. To analyse the content of the text • Operated by scholars during a TX5 Reading event for study • Related to the meaning, i.e. the E33 Linguistic Object, • Editorial interventions on the text • E.g.: C IULIUS CAEESAR C(aius) Iulius Cae{e}sar
Text and Text Segments • TX7 Written Text Segment. Subclass of TX1 Written Text, can be used to highlight specific portions of text on which the study focuses, specific phenomena appear or from which it is possible to derive special meanings. • Segmentation of ancient texts performed according with various typological/functional criteria and specific needs of the disciplines • columns, sections, chapters, lines, words, fragments …
An example: the Arch of Constantine • Located in its original position between the Colosseum and the Roman Forum • Triumphal marble arch (the largest monument of this class in Roman era) • Dedicated in 315/316 A.D. by the Roman Senate to the emperor Constantine after his victory over Maxentius at the Battle of the Milvian Bridge in 312 A.D. • Instance of the E22 Man-made Object class
The Arch of Constantine • North and South faces of the attic: two identical inscriptions (reference number: CIL VI 1139) • Originally inlaid with gilded bronze letters, explaining the reason of its construction. • IMP(ERATORI) · CAES(ARI) · FL(AVIO) · CONSTANTINO · MAXIMO · P(IO) · F(ELICI) · AVGUSTO · S(ENATUS) · P(OPULUS) · Q(UE) · R(OMANUS) · QVOD · INSTINCTV · DIVINITATIS · MENTIS · MAGNITVDINE · CVM · EXERCITV · SVO · TAM · DE · TYRANNO · QVAM · DE · OMNI · EIVS · FACTIONE · VNO · TEMPORE · IVSTIS · REMPVBLICAM · VLTVS · EST · ARMIS · ARCVM · TRIVMPHIS · INSIGNEM · DICAVIT To the Emperor Caesar Flavius Constantine, the Greatest, Pius, Felix, Augustus: inspired by (a) divinity, in the greatness of his mind, he used his army to save the state by the just force of arms from a tyrant on the one hand and every kind of factionalism on the other; therefore the Senate and the People of Rome have dedicated this exceptional arch to his triumphs
The Arch of Constantine: Investigations • Thousands of investigations during the centuries • Description of the monument as archaeological object • Transcription and comment of the texts • Reading and transcription by Bormann and Henzen in 1876 of the text(s) published in Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum (CIL VI 1139) • Analysis and transcription carried out by Rodolfo Lanciani in 1892 (1) • The“INSTINCTV DIVINITATIS”text portion of the inscription(s) commented by Rodolfo Lanciani (1) Lanciani, R.: The significance of the inscription on the Arch of Constantine, in Pagan and Christian Rome, Houghton, Mifflin and Company, Boston and New York, 1892.
CRMtex and TEI/EpiDoc • TX7 Written Text Fragment: enhances mappings to TEI/EpiDoc • TEI/EpiDoc: no semiotic distinction in analysing a text segment: • Characters erased in the past and are illegible (physical condition) <del rend="erasure"> • Characters restored by modern editor (interpretation/rendering) <supplied reason="lost"> • Abbreviation expansion added by modern editors (interpretation/rendering) • <expan> ; <ex> • CRMtex describes the same phenomena but in a semiotic way • Involving Writing, Reading and Transcription events
Text segments and editorial rendering • C IULIUS CAEESAR C(aius) Iulius Cae{e}sar • EpiDoc Encoding <expan> <abbr>C</abbr> <ex>aius</ex> </expan>
Open Issues • Mapping CRMtex – EpiDoc: to be continued • Text, sequence and disposition • Scope note of TX1 Written Text: “Subclass of E25 Man-Made Feature intended to describe a particular feature (i.e., ‘set of glyphs’) …” • Sequence of glyphs (and empty spaces): fundamental for the existence of a text • How to model a sequence in CIDOC CRM? Condition/State? • Possible TX8 class … • Disposition of the text • Decided by the writer during a TX2 Writing event for communication (text layout) • E.g.: the layout created for the inscription on Constantine’s Arch
Thank you • Achille Felicetti • PIN, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Italy • achille.felicetti@pin.unifi.it