Low Frequency Variability and Climate Regimes: A look at the Charney DeVore Model

1. Low Frequency Variability and Climate Regimes:A look at the Charney DeVore Model Josh Griffin and Marcus Williams

2. Outline • Brief History • Introduction • The CDV model • From Holton • From Charney • Examples • Stochastic forcing

3. What are we talking about? • We know that the climate is described as a basic state flow that is modified by eddy fluxes --needs better wording--- • Low frequency variability describes these eddy fluxes that last on time scales longer than those of transient eddies • Can be anywhere from 7-10 days to interannular variability • These persistent anomalies can lead to climate regimes in the general circulation of the atmosphere • These regimes are characterized be either a high-index or low-index state • Define climate regime • Graphic as an example

4. What is the purpose of the CDV model? • What does it look at? An extremely simplified model of a barotropic atmosphere. • What does it hope to solve? Hoped to describe the persistance of large amplitude flow anomalies like blocking or recurring regional weather patterns • What does it tell us? Examines the equilibrium mean states of the atmosphere when a damped topographic Rossby wave interacts with the zonal-mean flow. --direct quote from holton • Model tells us that there are multiple equilibrium solutions for the atmosphere. • Both solutions are stable, however only one is seen. ???

5. Who invented it? • Charney • Hard to find something he didn’t do… • His PhD thesis took up an entire journal in october 1947 • Important for 2 reasons --list them • Developed quasi-geostrophic approximations • Helped proved the concept of numerical weather prediction was feasible and practical • Helped come up with concept of barotropic instability ??? (“True” according to wikipedia) • Helped explain formation of mid-lat cyclones • Dishpan experiment • DeVore • One hit wonder… • This is his only paper listed on the AMS website • Apparently works for a company named Visidyne

6. Let’s talk about models… • Will be looking at two approaches • First approach is from Holton • Is a more ad hoc approach • Less dynamical than the original CDV paper • Actually feasible for us to derive… • Second approach is from CDV Paper • More dynamical • Mathematically complex

7. Holton’s approach • Start with the barotropic potential vorticity equation • Explain terms • Why use this equation? It is the simplest model of topographic Rossby waves • Make the assumption that the upper boundary is fixed at a height H and the lower boundary is variable height ht(x,y) where ht <<H

8. Now what? • First step is to linearize • Next we make some assumptions • Zonal mean flow • Take the zonal average

9. And then… • We then integrate the equation w.r.t y • By adding some “forcing??” terms, you arrive at the equation • Where • This is defined as the barotropic momentum equation

10. Now that we have an equation • The barotropic momentum equation is dominated by two terms • D(u) describes the forcing interaction between the waves and the mean flow • -kappa(u-Ue) describes a linear relaxation toward an externally determined basic state flow, Ue • Since we know D(u), we can plot the solution if we make some assumptions.

11. assumptions • Assume the streamfuction is composed of a single harmonic wave in the x and y direction. • Doing this results in: • We know that

12. Plug and chug • After plugging the wave solutions, D(u) simplifies • The eddy vorticity flux goes away • The second term, the form drag, is all that remains • Explain terms

13. Graphical solution • Explain the equilibrium points • Why is one low-index and one high index?

14. Transition slide into CDV paper

15. CDV derivation • The CDV model comprises a Rossby wave mode and uniform zonal flow over a mountain in a plane channel. • The coriolis parameter f is approximated by • The flow is restricted by lateral walls with width 0< y<Lx and length 0<x<Lx. • The flow is also periodic in longitude so • No normal transport at the boundaries requires to be constant at y= 0,Ly

16. CDV Derivation • The equation used in the model is the QGPV equation • To derive the low order spectral model you must expand , , and h(x,y) into orthonormal eigenfunctions of the Leplace operator. • This derivation is very complex. I will show a more general representation by solving Leplace’s equation on a rectangle and introducing the concept of orthogonality.

17. CDV Derivation • Laplace equation • Break the problem into four problems with each having one homogeneous condition • Next assume that u is a function of a product of x and y • Separate the variable to get an ODE for x and y and set equal to an arbitrary constant.

18. CDV Derivation • Solve x dependent equation and y dependent equation. The equation with two homogeneous boundary conditions will provide you with your eigenvalues. • Use boundary conditions to solve for the eigenfunction and orthogonality to solve for the inhomogeneous initial condition

19. CDV derivation • Orthogonality • Whenever it is said that functions are orthogonal over the interval 0<x<L. The term is borrowed from perpendicular vectors because the integral is analogous to a zero dot product

20. CDV Derivation • The process is similar in the derivation of the CDV model • First you have to non-dimensionalize the QGPV equation.(A1,A2) • Make the rigid lid approximation and use the characteristic height, the timescale, the horizintal length scale, and the characteristic amplitude of the topography. • The non-dimensionalized QGPV becomes

21. CDV Derivation • Represent h(x,y) and in terms of sines and cosines(A4). • Expand into three orthonormal modes(A3).

22. CDV derivation • Insert A3 and A4 back into the A1 and utilize the orthonomality of the eigenfunctions and let . • This leads to the following equations known as the CDV equations(A5). • These equations define the low-order spectral model.The CDV equations are solved to find the equilibrium points

23. CDV model • As we found from holton, the system has three equilibrium point. One unstable and two stable(Show graphic again?) • For arbitrary initial conditions the phase space trajectories always tend to one of the two stable equilibrium • This is a drawback of the CDV model because there is no way to transition between the two stable equilibrium points.

24. CDV model Example of a blocking climate regime in mid-lattitudes

25. Stochastic slide 1 • As was shown earlier, there is no way to start a transition from one stable equlibria to another • Papers by Eggert (1981) and Sura (2002) discuss this transition between equilibrium through stochastic processes

26. Stochastic slide 2 • Obviously, since the points are equilibrium points, the solutions tend to go to one of those points and remain there in the CDV model • By adding the stochastic white noise to the system, it generates a mechanism by which the system can switch between the equilibrium points

27. Matlab examples • Holton provides an example of a two-meridional-mode version of the Charney-DeVore model • Now we’ll show a few examples of how topographic forcing alters the streamfunctions, both in structure and persistence.