230 likes | 400 Views
Taking the first steps Xpert MTB/RIF Implementation in public sector in South Africa: Lessons Learned. Wendy Stevens Molecular Medicine and Haematology University of the Witwatersrand & NHLS. Acknowledgments to:. GeneXpert Technology (Cepheid). GX48 (Infinity ). GX16. GX4.
E N D
Taking the first steps Xpert MTB/RIF Implementation in public sector in South Africa: Lessons Learned Wendy Stevens Molecular Medicine and Haematology University of the Witwatersrand & NHLS Acknowledgments to:
GeneXpert Technology (Cepheid) GX48 (Infinity) GX16 GX4 16 64 255 throughput/ 8hr day FiND , 2010
Automated • Real-time PCR • Rapid (2 hours) • Cartridge based • Result • Positive/negative TB • Resistance yes/no to Rifampicin • Low contamination risk Boehme,C et al NEJM 2010
Disease Burden in South Africa • 20% worlds reported HIV‐associated TB cases and 2nd largest reported numbers of MDR • 70%-80% TB suspects infected with HIV • Overall TB rates 980/100,000 • Mining populations 2500/100,000 • Correctional Services 4500/100,0000 • Increasingly smear negative (8-10% positivity) and extra-pulmonary TB(16%) • WHO Strong Recommendation: “The new automated DNA test for TB should be used as the initial diagnostic test in individuals suspected of MDR-TB or HIV/TB” (i.e. all SA TB suspects)
NHLS TB Laboratory Facilities: 2010/2011 N=244 • 4.7 million smears • 1 million cultures • 90 000 LPA
Phase 1 rollout High burden, TB Intensified Case Finding campaign districts • Limited Pilot in all 9 provinces • Selection: volumes, district selected • 25 sites, 30 instruments • 20 GX4, 9 GX16, 1 GX48 • Placement by world TB day: March 24th • 11% national coverage based on 2010 smears/2.0 2 smears at diagnosis to be replaced by one Xpert MTB/RIF (Phased approach) (microscopy centre based)
Where should Xpert be placed within TB diagnostic algorithm?
Methodology: March-June 2011 • Site needs assessment: 25 sites • Hoods, space, network points, power, A/C, HR, checklist developed • Training • 80 laboratory technologists : intensive 2 day centralised training • -microscopists currently first cadre • SOP driven • LIMS interfacing (pilot) • A Lab-Track LIS interface was developed to automatically report: Lab number, cartridge number, TB detected/not, RIF detected/not. • A verification program (“fit for purpose”) for placement and calibration of each module • [MOPE147] • Development of implementation plan, budget and National TB Costing Model (NTCM)
National Xpert MTB Results (cumulative March to June) N = 50 093
National Xpert RIF results: March-June 2011 N = 8591 (MTB detected); 630 RIF Resistance
TB GeneXpert Positivity: eThekwini District in KZN Average smear positive rates for same period 2010 and 2011: 8%-9%
National Phased Implementation PHASES| PILOT | FULL PILOT|HIGH CASE| GF XPERT | CONTROL| DISTRICTS| ALL LABS FAST SCALE-UP | July 2011 | Dec 2011 | Sept 2011 | Mar 2011 | Dec 2011 | Dec 2012 SLOW SCALE-UP | July 2011 | Dec 2011 | Sept 2011 | Mar 2012 | Mar 2013 | Sept 2013 • FAST SCALE-UP scenario: Full coverage by December 2012 (Ministerial mandate) • SLOW SCALE-UP scenario: Full coverage by September 2013
Model for instrument placement(Fast scale-up, 10% growth in suspects) Initiated at current microscopy centres, volumes based on adjusted smear per patient , throughput of analysers. CAPITAL : $21 M
Recurrent costCost per MTB/RIF test (including hidden costs) Cost will vary: dependent on implementation rate, exchange global volumes, negotiation, freight • Modelled Average per test cost across all scenarios • 2011/12 to 2013/14: R 216.30 $ 26-36 • 2014/15 to 2016/17: R 189.85
National TB Cost Model • To estimate implementation costs for NHLS lab network • To inform national-level budget requirements (2011-2017) • To estimate the incremental national health service cost of replacing the existing pulmonary TB diagnostic algorithm with a new algorithm incorporating Xpert MTB/RIF molecular technology, under routine care conditions and at costs incurred by the government (Excel-based population level decision model) (HER0) • Built into Rollout BMGF study: cluster randomised trial design (phase 3a and b) : to verify modelling and assess impact ( Aurum Institute)
Programme cost:Total and per case cost in 2013 [2011 USD] (Fast scale-up, 10% growth , SA at 50% of global volume, purchase)
Conclusions I • Pilot demonstrated feasibility of implementation • Significantly increased early detection of MTB • Significantly increased screening for potential MDR cases • Significant changes to National TB program envisaged • Facilitating HIV/TB integration at laboratory, clinic and programmatic level • Expensive algorithm which may well have to be modified as confidence in technology and data emerges
Infinity Installation in Prince Msheyni in KZN: truly a team effort
Acknowledgements • NHLS NPP program • NDoH: Drs Mametje, Pillay, Mvusi, Barron • NTBRL: Drs Erasmus and Coetzee • CHAI SA • HERO team, G. Meyer –Rath, K. Bistline • Right to care: Ian Sanne • MM&H: Prof Scott, N. Gous, B. Cunningham • USAID South Africa • CDC for funding and support • FIND • Aurum Institute