A Feast in Nuyoo : People and Their Things

1. A Feast in Nuyoo: People and Their Things Systems of Exchange

2. Saasa’a… In order to host a feast the mayordomos recruit items from other households in order to have enough to complete the expectations of the feast. They are able to do this because they themselves, as a couple, have been contributing to other mayordomos feasts for a time. When it is their turn to host the other households come forth with tribute. Through the sharing of food the people become, symbolically, members of one household. Unless, of course, there is a clump of hair in a tortilla!

3. Marcel Mauss, “The Gift”… • “In primitive or archaic types of society what is the principle whereby the gift received has to be repaid? What force is there in the thing given which compels the recipient to make a return?”

4. ‘I shall tell you about hau. Hauis not the wind. Not at all. Suppose you have some particular object, taonga, andyou give it to me; you give it to me without a price. We do not bargain over it. Now I give this thing to a third person who after a time decides to give me something in repayment for it (utu), and he makes me a present of something (taonga). Now this taongaI received from him is the spirit (hau) of the taongaIreceived from you and which I passed on to him. The taongawhich I receive on account of the taonga that came from you, I must return to you. It would not be right on my part to keep these taongawhether they were desirable or not. I must give them to you since they are the hauof the taongawhich you gave me. If I were to keep this second taongafor myself I might become ill or even die. Such is hau, thehauof personal property, the hauof the taonga, thehauof the forest. Enough on that subject.’ TamatiRanaipiri, Maori informant to Mr. Elsdon Best, from ‘Forest-Lore’, in Transactions of the New Zealand Institute, XLII, 435.

5. Forms of Reciprocity and Exchange • Generalized Reciprocity • Balanced Reciprocity • Negative Reciprocity • These types of exchange are mediated by social distance

6. The Politics of Exchange …to create an obligation. Reciprocal exchanges are designed to forge ties between affinal kin groups, between non-related groups. The feast in Nuyoo is reflective of traditional economy. It is about having a successful feast and creating solidarity among the families or kin groups. But what if there is a breach of protocol or a trangression of some sort? Potential for tension (witchcraft).

7. Reciprocal transactions are not always perfectly symmetrical, nor do they imply equality between the giver and receiver. If you give a gift and receive less than you expect, you feel slighted. The transaction should be appropriate to the social distance between the parties involved. If not there will be tension. H. M. DjafarAmyn would not eat! The villagers complained “If he won’t eat anything , how can we ask him to help us?”

8. Silent trade…negative reciprocity • What about trade between antagonistic groups? They don’t like each other and don’t wish to have contact. • Mbuti of the rainforest of the Congo and their agricultural neighbors the Ndembu… exchange with villagers in neighboring groups in which they place the items for exchange in a predetermined spot, then hide at a distance and wait for the other group to make an offer of their goods. Bartering may continue back and forth, but no direct contact is made between groups.

9. Northwest Coast Potlatch… • Warring with property? • The potlatch was a demonstration of social and economic power. To have the ability, the strength, to give it all away and not be affected by your loss was to be the most powerful and led to great honor. • However the Canadian government saw the potlatch another way and it was banned in 1885. • The issue of economics was simple in the notion that the native desire to give away all their goods was the opposite of the “Christian capitalist” values held in high esteem by Euro-Canadians. Missionary William Duncan wrote in 1875 that the potlatch was "by far the most formidable of all obstacles in the way of Indians becoming Christians, or even civilized."

10. Reciprocity as form of Economy Market exchange as the basis for human economic life is a very narrow view of how human societies move wealth and/or product around. A full understanding of economic life in many societies would have to take account of a range of non-market transactions such as marriage payments, gift exchange, tribute, sacrifice, etc.