1 / 4

Subsystem Reports , TOF , Nov/16/2001 Hiroshi Tsuruoka

TOF Calibration Results. Compare the Run2 conversion parameter to the Run1 one Run dependence Difference between measured value and slope parameter. Thank you for taking TOF calibration data!. Oct 24 -- Hill Oct 27 -- John Oct 28 -- Martin Nov 2 -- Rob

priscilla-boyd
Download Presentation

Subsystem Reports , TOF , Nov/16/2001 Hiroshi Tsuruoka

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. TOF Calibration Results • Compare the Run2 conversion parameter to the Run1 one • Run dependence • Difference between measured value and slope parameter Thank you for taking TOF calibration data! Oct 24 -- Hill Oct 27 -- John Oct 28 -- Martin Nov 2 -- Rob Nov 4,5 -- Charles Nov 5 -- Allan Nov 7,9,11 -- Ozawa Nov 10 -- Federica Nov 15 -- Sam Subsystem Reports , TOF , Nov/16/2001 Hiroshi Tsuruoka

  2. Compare the Run2 conversion parameter to the Run1 one Year1 Year2 Year2-Year1 Year2 / Year1

  3. Run dependence Run dependence Conversion parameter [ps/ch] Oct 24 Nov 7 Nov 10 Oct 27 Oct 28 Nov 5 Nov 5 Nov 15 Conversion parameter [ps/ch] TOF FEM ID 0-0-0

  4. Difference between measured value and slope parameter T’ TVC [ch] T TP_Delay ( 1 TP_Delay = 1.6653ns ) T’-T [ch] T’-T [ch] TOF FEM ID 0-0-0 TOF FEM ID 0-0-1

More Related