1 / 27

Quark Matter, 2002, Nantes Correlations and Fluctuations Summary

Summary of recent research on HBT measurements in high-energy nuclear collisions, covering pt fluctuations, multiplicity correlations, isospin/strangeness phenomena, and more. Scott Pratt from Michigan State University reviews recent findings and discusses the HBT puzzle, potential solutions, and future research directions.

proberts
Download Presentation

Quark Matter, 2002, Nantes Correlations and Fluctuations Summary

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Quark Matter, 2002, NantesCorrelations and Fluctuations Summary Scott Pratt, Michigan State University • New HBT measurements • The HBT puzzle • pt fluctuations • Multiplicity correlations • Isospin/Strangeness fluctuations • Charge fluctuations and balance functions Scott Pratt Michigan State University

  2. HBT: pp AGS->SPS->RHIC: Rbeam:increases smoothly Rside: falls then rises Rout: changes little Scott Pratt Michigan State University

  3. pp HBT: Consensus at RHIC STAR ~ PHENIX ~ PHOBOS PHOBOS  Rout Rside Rlong - - 0.540.02 5.80.2 5.10.4 6.80.3 ++ 0.570.03 5.80.2 4.90.4 7.30.3 0.85 < Rout/Rside < 1.15 Scott Pratt Michigan State University

  4. HBT vs. Reaction Plane STAR • Out-of-plane extended • Opposite of RQMD • Rapid dissolution? Scott Pratt Michigan State University

  5. pp HBT: 3-Pion HBT • Chaoticity from STAR ~ 1 • Robustness is an issue Scott Pratt Michigan State University

  6. pp HBT: Breakup Density • Always model dependent • Varies from SPS to RHIC pions protons D. Adamova et al Also, see talk of B. Tomasik Scott Pratt Michigan State University

  7. High phase space densityLow entropyHydro: fits spectra / underpredicts R thereforeInitial state has less entropy than assumed in hydro pp HBT: Phase Space Density <f> pt Scott Pratt Michigan State University

  8. pp HBT: Entropy ÖSNN = 130 GeV Peripheral S/N Landau S/N for Bose Gas STAR Preliminary Central John G. Cramer Scott Pratt Michigan State University

  9. pp HBT: Entropy Low entropy suggests coherence in initial state colored-glass condensate? gluonic super-radiance? Scott Pratt Michigan State University

  10. KK HBT: NA49 PHENIX Scott Pratt Michigan State University

  11. KK and pp HBT: • Rp < RK < Rp M. Heffner, PHENIX Scott Pratt Michigan State University

  12. Correlations: New Species • L-p tests strangeness dynamics • Ks-Ks No Coulomb • LL Infer interaction Lp Correlation LL HBT NA49 Ks-Ks HBT STAR, preliminary Scott Pratt Michigan State University

  13. WA98: gg HBT • Measures Direct g!! • l ~ 1.005 requires10% direct g • Rinv ~ 6 fm C(Qinv) Qinv Scott Pratt Michigan State University

  14. WA98: gg HBT • Direct g spectra: Scott Pratt Michigan State University

  15. Non-Identical Particle Correlations Compare q1,out - q2,out >0 vs q1,out - q2,out <0 p ahead of K, K ahead of p fit by blast wave: T=110, <v>=0.5c hadronic models: K ahead of p Scott Pratt Michigan State University

  16. (F. Retiere, STAR) Out ratio • Non-Identical Particle • Correlations • Consistent with blast wave • pK would provide sensitive test NA49 Side ratio Long ratio Scott Pratt Michigan State University

  17. HBT PUZZLE Small Rout implies small Dt P.Kolb Small Rbeam implies small breakup t, ~10 fm/c Large Rside implies large R Scott Pratt Michigan State University

  18. HBT PUZZLE(S) 1. Why does the blast wave fit? (with Dt ~ 0) Where is the emission from the surface? (as in Hydro+Cascade) 2. Why does the matter fall fall apart so quickly?t ~ 10 fm/c, R ~ 13 fm, vmax ~ 0.75 Scott Pratt Michigan State University

  19. *presented here • Theory Investigations: • Hydro+Hadron Cascade tried multiple times(Teaney, *Soff, Bass & Dumitru, *Kolb, *Huovinen, *Hirano…) • Accounting for experimental resolution & Coulomb(*CERES, *Heffner, Brown, S.P.,STAR) • Viscous effects (*Teaney, *Heinz, S.P.) • Varying Chemical Rates and cross-sections(*Soff, *Hirano & Tetsufumi) • Non-Gaussian distortions(Brown, Kolb, Heinz, SBD) RESULT: Factor of 2 discrepancy reduced to 30% discrepancy In both short t puzzle and Rout/Rside puzzle Scott Pratt Michigan State University

  20. Possible Solutions to the HBT Puzzle • Anomalously stiff EOSWould cs=c be sufficient? • Phase boundary retards transportReduces emissivity (S. Padula)Implies super-cooling (T. Csorgo) • Is something wrong with the HBT dogma? Scott Pratt Michigan State University

  21. HBT: To-do List • Experiment: • Make Coulomb standard (See poster of M. Heffner) • Finish Kaon systematics • HBT as function of centrality (E735 from FNAL, pp) • Theory: • Solve the HBT puzzle Scott Pratt Michigan State University

  22. pt fluctuations • bigger acceptance  larger Fpt • ptcorrelations span largeDy and Df • Beware of the mundane. NA49 preliminary PHENIX Preliminary STAR Scott Pratt Michigan State University

  23. Multiplicity Fluctuations: Wavelet Analysis • Evidence for jet quenching STAR, HIJING,HIJING w/o JETS M.Kopytine multiplicity Scott Pratt Michigan State University

  24. Isospin Fluctuations • Theory: • Consider baryonic/strange degrees of freedom (Gavin, Wong) • Experiment: • First measurement of Nch/Ng • fluctuations in HI collisions • Fluctuations are small (WA98) Scott Pratt Michigan State University

  25. Charge fluctuations and balance functions • (N+-N-)2 driven by charge conservation Correlation functions Charge Fluctuations NA49 preliminary STAR preliminary Scott Pratt Michigan State University

  26. Charge fluctuations and balance functions • Measure separationof balancing charges • Can signal delayedhadronization Dh Scott Pratt Michigan State University

  27. Charge fluctuations and balance functions Balance Function Width • Separation decreases with centrality • Requires delayed production of charge (delayed hadronization) • Suggests creation of gluon-rich matter Scott Pratt Michigan State University

More Related