1 / 27

WHAT CAN WE LEARN FROM THE NSC RESULTS? SETTING AND MAINTAINING STANDARDS in the NSC

WHAT CAN WE LEARN FROM THE NSC RESULTS? SETTING AND MAINTAINING STANDARDS in the NSC Portfolio Committee APRIL 2012. Regulatory Framework Quality Assurance of Assessment NQF Act Section 27 (h)

pshinn
Download Presentation

WHAT CAN WE LEARN FROM THE NSC RESULTS? SETTING AND MAINTAINING STANDARDS in the NSC

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. WHAT CAN WE LEARN FROM THE NSC RESULTS? SETTING AND MAINTAINING STANDARDS in the NSC Portfolio Committee APRIL 2012

  2. Regulatory Framework • Quality Assurance of Assessment • NQF Act Section 27 (h) • The QC must develop and implement policy and criteria for assessment for the qualifications on its sub-framework. • From Quality Assurance to Standard Setting

  3. Umalusi Model for Setting Standards for Qualifications on the Sub-framework • Qualifications and Curriculum – Intended Curriculum • Evaluation and Accreditation – Enacted Curriculum • Quality Assurance of Assessment – Assessed Curriculum

  4. Purpose of the National Senior Certificate • Relatively new qualification • Inherited qualification • Purpose of the NSC • HE vs. School Leaving • HE vs. Employment • Single qualification to accommodate all candidates vs. previous HG / SG option • The underlying philosophy of the NCS had • been designed to ensure that most people • achieve the minimum requirement for a pass

  5. Standards for the National Senior Certificate • Standards captured in National Curriculum Statements and Subject Assessment Guidelines (National Policy Documents) • HE participants in development of NCS • Umalusi responsibility to ensure that NCS and SAG standards are maintained

  6. Quality of the NSC questioned….. • 1. More learners passing – at lower levels • 2. Pass mark of 30 % and 40% • 3. Qualifying candidates not displaying requisite • knowledge and skills • 4. Maths and Lang competencies continue to be • weak • 5. Standardisation process questioned • 6. National Benchmark Tests

  7. Immediate critical issues….. • 1. (perceived ) Gap between School and HE • and everything in between • 2. Standards of Assessment

  8. Higher Education • Issue of University readiness as old as education itself • NSC – minimum requirements (revision?) • University and faculty admission requirements • Bridging Programmes • “Blame Game” – a vicious cycle

  9. Some points of comparison • The number of candidates passing • The quality of the results • The standardisation of the exam • The predictive quality of the exam for performance at HE level

  10. Pass Mark • 1. 30% and 40 % not invention of the NSC • 2. SC – converted passes HG to SG; SG to LG • 3. SC - exemption determined by attaining aggregate score • 4. NSC – 3 x 40% and 3x 30% (40% in HL) • Higher certificate – NSC + 30% (LOLT) • Diploma – NSC + 30%(LOLT) + 4 (40% and above) • Degree - NSC + 30%(LOLT) + 4 (50% and above from • designated list)

  11. The number of candidates passing • Massification is a natural outcome of an education system that is non-racist, non-sexist and democratic • It is clear that there has been a steady increase over the last decade in the number of learners who enrolled for and wrote the SC and then NSC – notable exception 2010 and 2011

  12. The number of candidates passing :Trends in SC / NSC enrolment and passes SC / NSC examination results, all schools, 1994-2011 Sources: DoE, 2004, 2005a, 2005b, 2005c, 2007, 2008, 2009

  13. Sources: DoE, 2004, 2005a, 2005b, 2005c, 2007, 2008, 2009

  14. The quality of the results • Concerns about quality has become a thorny issue and the subject of much debate albeit uninformed at most times. • SA public uses the matric results as the main indicators of quality of the education system and so there is an understandable concern about what these results of a relatively new qualification is saying about the current state of education • It is important however that we interrogate some of our assumptions that inform our beliefs about standards and quality

  15. Assumptions that affect our perceptions • The assumption is that “more means less” or “more means worse” • The assumption that a higher pass rate is as a result of: • Lowering standards • Upward adjustment of marks

  16. Umalusi’s comparative research:NSC with SC (NATED 550) • Another assumption is that the NCS is of a lower standard than the previous curriculum. • Research completed by Umalusi into the standard of the NCS curriculum confirms that in most cases the NCS presents a greater cognitive challenge • The NCS also represents modern, updated and more demanding versions of previous subjects

  17. Understanding the NSC • 2008 Maintaining Standards, 2009 – 6 gateway subjects comparing the intended and examined curricula for the SC and the NSC • 2009 Maintaining Standards, 2010 – Accounting, Business Studies, Economics and History • Evaluating the South African NSC i.r.o selected international qualifications: a self-referencing exercise to determine the standing of the NSC, 2010 - research jointly undertaken by Umalusi and Higher Education South Africa

  18. Umalusi’s research on comparisons with other qualifications • Another assumption is that the NCS is of a lower standard than the previous curriculum. • Research completed by Umalusi into the standard of the NCS curriculum confirms that in most cases the NCS presents a greater cognitive challenge • The NCS also represents modern, updated and more demanding versions of previous subjects

  19. Umalusi’s research on comparisons with other qualifications • National Senior Certificate (NSC), Department of (Basic) Education (South Africa)/Umalusi • International Baccalaureate Diploma, Standard Level and higher Level, International Baccalaureate Organization • International General Certificate of Secondary Education (IGCSE), A Levels, Cambridge International Examinations (CIE) • Namibian Senior Secondary Certificate (NSSC), Department of Education (Namibia)

  20. Findings • NSC curriculum fits comparably within the range of selected curricula • Content and level most similar to the IB SL and CIE AS Level

  21. Minimum Pass Mark

  22. Trust and credibility:The standardisation of the exam • Another assumption is that we now use vastly different methods of standardising the results • Responsibility for matriculation results has changed hands: • JMB (1918 to 1992) • SAFCERT (1992 – 2001) • Umalusi (2002 – to date) • The one constant has been the standardisation process used for the examinations. This is crucial to: • Obtain equivalence of the standard of the qualification across years, subjects • Deliver a relatively constant product to the HE sector and to the workplace • Trust in the statutory institutions established with particular mandates.

  23. SC / NSC examination results Senior Certificate examination results, all schools, 1994-2011 Sources: DoE, 2004, 2005a, 2005b, 2005c, 2007, 2008, 2009

  24. SC / NSC examination results and HE SC/NSC examination results, all schools, 1994-2010 Sources: DoE, 2004, 2005a, 2005b, 2005c, 2007, 2008, 2009

  25. SC/ NSC examination results and HE SC/ NSC examination results, all schools, 1994-2010 Sources: DoE, 2004, 2005a, 2005b, 2005c, 2007, 2008, 2009

  26. Senior Certificate examination results Senior Certificate examination results, all schools, 1994-2008 Sources: DoE, 2004, 2005a, 2005b, 2005c, 2007, 2008, 2009

  27. Thank You

More Related