1 / 44

802.11 Nov 2012 Motions

802.11 Nov 2012 Motions. Authors:. Date: 2012-11-15. Abstract. This document is a composite of all 802.11 sub-group motions that may be brought at the Nov 2012 midweek and closing plenaries. Wednesday. PAD SG Motions. November 2012. Study Group Extension Motion.

pules
Download Presentation

802.11 Nov 2012 Motions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 802.11 Nov 2012 Motions Authors: Date: 2012-11-15 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  2. Abstract • This document is a composite of all 802.11 sub-group motions that may be brought at the Nov 2012 midweek and closing plenaries. Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  3. Wednesday Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  4. PAD SG Motions Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  5. November 2012 Study Group Extension Motion • Request the IEEE 802 LMSC to extend the IEEE 802.11 PAD Study Group. • Note: this is to allow further work to finalise PAR and 5 Criteria documentation, in case the PAR is not approved by NesCom. • Moved on behalf of PAD SG by Stephen McCann • Seconded: Dwight Smith • PAD SG Result: Moved: Michael Montemurro, Second: Stuart Kerry, Result: 37/0/0 Stephen McCann, RIM

  6. November 2012 PAR Motion • Believing that the PAR content contained in the document referenced below meets IEEE-SA guidelines, request that the PAR content contained in 802.11-12/1081r6 be posted to the IEEE 802 Executive Committee (EC) agenda for WG 802 preview and EC approval to submit to NesCom. • Moved on behalf of PAD SG by Stephen McCann • Second: • PAD SG Result: Moved: Dwight Smith,2nd: Stuart Kerry, Result: 31/0/0 Stephen McCann, RIM

  7. November 2012 PAR Motion (amendment) • Believing that the PAR content contained in the document referenced below meets IEEE-SA guidelines, request that the PAR content contained in 802.11-12/1081r6 be posted to the IEEE 802 Executive Committee (EC) agenda for WG 802 preview and EC approval to submit to NesCom. • Moved/seconded: Stephen McCann, RIM

  8. November 2012 PAR Motion (amended) • Believing that the PAR content contained in the document referenced below meets IEEE-SA guidelines, request that the PAR content contained in 802.11-12/1081r6 be posted to the IEEE 802 Executive Committee (EC) agenda for EC approval to submit to NesCom. • Moved on behalf of PAD SG by Stephen McCann • Second: Dwight Smith • Result: 78,0,0 • PAD SG Result: Moved: Dwight Smith,2nd: Stuart Kerry, Result: 31/0/0 Stephen McCann, RIM

  9. November 2012 5C Motion • Believing that the Five Criteria contained in the document referenced below meets IEEE 802 guidelines, request that the Five Criteria contained in 802.11-12/1137r6 be posted to the IEEE 802 Executive Committee (EC) agenda for WG 802 preview and EC approval. • Moved on behalf of PAD SG by Stephen McCann • Second: • PAD SG Result: Moved: Dwight Smith, 2nd: Michael Montemurro, Result: 33/0/0 Stephen McCann, RIM

  10. November 2012 5C Motion (amendment) • Believing that the Five Criteria contained in the document referenced below meets IEEE 802 guidelines, request that the Five Criteria contained in 802.11-12/1137r6 be posted to the IEEE 802 Executive Committee (EC) agenda for WG 802 preview and EC approval. • Amendment moved: • Seconded: Stephen McCann, RIM

  11. November 2012 5C Motion (amended) • Believing that the Five Criteria contained in the document referenced below meets IEEE 802 guidelines, request that the Five Criteria contained in 802.11-12/1137r6 be posted to the IEEE 802 Executive Committee (EC) agenda for EC approval. • Moved on behalf of PAD SG by Stephen McCann • Second: Dwight Smith • Result: 72,0,1 • PAD SG Result: Moved: Dwight Smith, 2nd: Michael Montemurro, Result: 33/0/0 Stephen McCann, RIM

  12. GLK SG Motions Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  13. Tuesday, 13 November 201219:30-21:30 (cont.) • Consideration of PAR and 5 Criteria Comments • Comments from Paul Nikolich, Chair of 802: • I have the following comment on the Amendment: Enhancements For Transit Links Within Bridged Networks draft PAR. • In section 5.5 Need for Project, some of the language is ambiguous and difficult to parse, specifically "These developments raise a demand for bridging of IEEE 802.11 media to the same level as other media can be bridged: as media internal to the network as well as media offering access to the network.” • For example, what does "bridging of 802.11 media to the same level as other media" mean?  Is there a particular function or parameter that is implied whose "same level" is the target of that sentence? Donald Eastlake 3rd, Huawei Technologies

  14. Tuesday, 13 November 201219:30-21:30 (cont.) • Paul Nikolich comments (continued) • I can't offer alternate language because I don't understand what you are trying to convey with that sentence.  Please explain or consider rewording it for clarity. • Regards, • --Paul Donald Eastlake 3rd, Huawei Technologies

  15. Tuesday, 13 November 201219:30-21:30 (cont.) • Motion: • In response to Paul Nikolich’s comments, change the last sentence of Section 5.5 of the 802.11ak draft PAR as follows: • “These developments raise a demand for thebridging of IEEE 802.11 media with the same bridging services to the same level as other media can be bridged: as media internal to the network as well as media offering access to the network.” • Moved: Chris Williams Seconded: Mark Hamilton • Yes: 17 No: 0 Abstain: 1 Donald Eastlake 3rd, Huawei Technologies

  16. GLK Motion 1 • Request the IEEE 802 LMSC to extend the IEEE 802.11 GLK Study Group. • Moved: Donald Eastlake 3rd on behalf of GLK SG • Seconded: Mark Hamilton • Result: 77,0,0 • GLK: Moved: Mark Hamilton Seconded: Ian Sherlock Yes: 13 No: 0 Abstain: 0Note: this is to allow further work to finalize the PAR and 5 Criteria documents in the case they are not approved.

  17. GLK Motion 2 • Believing that the PAR contained in the document referenced below meets IEEE-SA guidelines, • Request that the PAR contained in 11-12-1207r1 be posted to the IEEE 802 Executive Committee (EC) agenda for WG 802 preview and EC approval to submit to NesCom. • Moved by Donald Easlake 3rd (on behalf of GLK SG) • Seconded: Ian Sherlock • GLK: Moved: Ian Sherlock, Seconded: Mark Hamilton, Result: 18 – 0 – 0

  18. GLK Motion 2 (amendment) • Believing that the PAR contained in the document referenced below meets IEEE-SA guidelines, • Request that the PAR contained in 11-12-1207r1 be posted to the IEEE 802 Executive Committee (EC) agenda for WG 802 preview and EC approval to submit to NesCom. • Amendment moved: Adrian Stephens • seconded: Jon Rosdahl

  19. GLK Motion 2 (amended) • Believing that the PAR contained in the document referenced below meets IEEE-SA guidelines, • Request that the PAR contained in 11-12-1207r1 be posted to the IEEE 802 Executive Committee (EC) agenda for EC approval to submit to NesCom. • Moved by Donald Eastlake 3rd (on behalf of GLK SG) • Seconded: Ian Sherlock • Result: 86,0,0 • GLK: Moved: Ian Sherlock, Seconded: Mark Hamilton, Result: 18 – 0 – 0

  20. Friday Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  21. WG telecons Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  22. Teleconferences Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  23. Publicity (.11ad press release) Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  24. Approve the press release in document 11-12/1066r0 related to the publication of IEEE 802.11ad. Moved: Stephen McCann Seconded: EldadPerahia Result: Motion Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  25. TGac Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  26. Motion for Ad Hoc Meeting • Authorize TGac to hold an ad-hoc meeting on March 13-15 in the Bay Area, for the purpose of advancing comment resolution. • Moved by Osama Aboul-Magd on behalf of TGac • TGac vote: • Moved: Brian hart, Seconded: EldadPerahia, Result: 11-1-0 Osama Aboul-Magd (Huawei Technologies)

  27. TGaf Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  28. TGaf Motion • Having approved comment resolutions for all of the comments received from LB189 on P802.11af D2.0 as contained in document 11-12/1017r23 • Instruct the editor to prepare Draft 3.0 incorporating these resolutions and, • Approve a 30 day Working Group Recirculation Ballot starting on or after December 7, 2012, asking the question “Should P802.11af D3.0 be forwarded to Sponsor Ballot?” • Moved by Rich Kennedy on behalf of TGaf • TGaf vote: • Moved: Al Petrick Seconded: Jens Tingleff Result: 14-0-0 Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  29. IETF Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  30. Approve that the 802.11 chair to send a request to Mr. D. Romascanu to add the “802.11 Mesh and TRILL” topic to the “list of areas of shared interest between IETF and IEEE 802”. Moved: Donald Eastlake 3rd Seconded: Dave Halasz Motion Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  31. Text of Entry XX. 802.11 Mesh and TRILL XX.1 Description The 802.11-2012 standard - provides for mesh operation, - standardizes one path selection protocol for directing PDUs through an 802.11 mesh - provides hooks so that additional path selection protocols can be used, whether specified by 802.11 or other bodies. Both Shortest Path Bridging based and TRILL based 802.11 mesh path selection protocols could be defined. XX.2. Relevant Documents https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/12/11-12-0621-04-0000-alternative-mesh-path-selection.pptx XX.3. Owners (Bruce Kraemer, Ralph Droms ?) XX.4. Action Items Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  32. ETSI MOU Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  33. IEEE-SA –European Telecommunication Standards Institute (ETSI) Memorandum of understanding renewal David Law, HPdlaw@hp.com Moira Patterson, IEEE-SAm.patterson@ieee.org

  34. IEEE-SA - ETSI MOU • IEEE-SA and ETSI are in the process of renewing and updating their MOU, aiming for finalization in mid-November (previous MOUs signed in 1999, and updated in 2009) Benefits • Map areas of mutual interest, where WGs express interest in closer cooperation. This provides IEEE WGs some benefits they would not otherwise have: • Framework to request that drafts be shared • Framework to send an observer to ETSI groups

  35. Document sharing between mapped technical groups • ETSI TC can request documents, including working documents, standards drafts, workplans, roadmaps, and future plans • IEEE WG can request documents, including working documents, standards drafts, workplans, roadmaps, and future plans • This exchange is conditional on the owning TC/WG’s agreement to provide the requested documents • AND The dissemination by one party of the documents received from the other party will be strictly limited to the participants in the IEEE WG and members of the ETSI Working Group, and solely for the purpose of technical and/or promotional activities relating to the party's work programme.

  36. Observers or non-voting participants between mapped technical groups • To the extent permitted by the relevant party’s organizational documents, and upon mutual consent, attendance at the other technical group’s meeting may be accepted, as follows: • When the agenda contains items of mutual interest, the IEEE WG may nominate an Observer to attend the ETSI TC meeting. • When the agenda contains items of mutual interest, the ETSI TC may nominate a Non-Voting Participant to attend the IEEE WG meeting. • These Observers/Non-Voting Participants shall be entitled to participate fully in discussions on relevant work items, and may submit written contributions for information only, but shall have no voting rights, unless such rights are obtained under the relevant party’s organizational documents. This MOU does not allow for these contributions to be incorporated; incorporation would require prior written consent. • They should inform in writing the Chairperson of the ETSI Technical Body or the IEEEWorking Group in which they are participating if there are overlapping work areas.

  37. Mapping proposed by ETSI

  38. The IEEE 802.11 Working Group agrees to be included in the ETSI Technical Cooperation Agreement annex. Moved: Jon Rosdahl Seconded: Adrian Stephens Result: Motion Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  39. ARC New Business - RAC Proposal Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  40. Approve document 11-12/1420r0 for submittal to IEEE-SA Registration Authority. Moved: Mark Hamilton Seconded: Stephen McCann Motion Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  41. PAD SG new business Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  42. November 2012 Motion • Request the IEEE 802.11 WG chair to liaise document “11-12-1389-00-0000-liaison-to-wfa-regarding-11aq-PAR.doc” to the Wi-Fi Alliance, subject to approval of the IEEE 802.11aq PAR by IEEE-SA. • Moved: Stephen McCann • Second: Richard Kennedy • PAD Result: Moved: Stuart Kerry, Second: Dwight Smith, 30/0/0 Stephen McCann, RIM

  43. TGaf new business Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  44. TGaf Coexistence Assurance Document • Approve the Coexistence Assurance document in 11-11/0177r1. • Moved: Rich Kennedy • Seconded: Peter Ecclesine • In the TG: • Moved by: Al • Seconded by: Joe • Vote: 15 Y 0 N 0 A - Passes Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

More Related