400 likes | 546 Views
Neutrino Physics III. Hitoshi Murayama Taiwan Spring School March 28, 2002. 中性微子物理(三). 村山 斉 台湾春期学校 二千二年三月二十八日. Outline. LSND Implications of Neutrino Mass Why do we exist? Models of flavor Conclusions. LSND. Excess positron events over calculated BG. 3.3 s Signal.
E N D
Neutrino Physics III Hitoshi Murayama Taiwan Spring School March 28, 2002
中性微子物理(三) 村山 斉 台湾春期学校 二千二年三月二十八日
Outline • LSND • Implications of Neutrino Mass • Why do we exist? • Models of flavor • Conclusions
Excess positron events over calculated BG 3.3s Signal
LSND unconfirmed Neutrino beam from Fermilab booster Settles the issue of LSND evidence Start data taking later this year Mini-BooNE
SN1987A neutrino burstdoesn’t like LSND • Kamiokande’s 11 events: • 1st event is forward may well be ne from deleptonization burst (p e- n ne to become neutron star) • Later events most likely ne • LSND parameters cause complete MSW conversion of nenm if light side (ne lighter) nenm if dark side (ne heavier) • Either mass spectrum disfavored _ _ _ HM, Yanagida
SN1987A neutrino burstdoesn’t like LSND HM, Yanagida
LSND, atmospheric and solar neutrino oscillation signals Dm2LSND ~ eV2 Dm2atm ~ 310–3eV2 Dm2solar < 10–3eV2 Can’t be accommodated with 3 neutrinos Need a sterile neutrino New type of neutrino with no weak interaction 3+1 or 2+2 spectrum? Sterile Neutrino
Sterile Neutrino getting tight • 3+1 spectrum: sin22qLSND=4|U4e|2|U4m|2 • |U4m|2 can’t be big because of CDHS, SK U/D • |U4e|2 can’t be big because of Bugey • Marginally allowed (90% excl. vs 99% allw’d) • 2+2 spectrum: past fits preferred • Atmospheric mostly nmnt • Solar mostly nens(or vice versa) • Now solar sterile getting tight (Barger et al, Giunti et al, Gonzalez-Garcia et al, Strumia)
Global fit to four-neutrino oscillation Solar, Atmospheric, LSND (Gonzalez-Garcia, Maltoni, Peña-Garay@EPS01) One can still find a reasonable fit with 2+2 Disfavored at 90-99% CL Not Quite Excluded Yet… ne nt nm ns nens nmnt
LSND evidence: anti-neutrinos Solar evidence: neutrinos If neutrinos and anti-neutrinos have different mass spectra, atmos-pheric, solar, LSND accommodated without a sterile neutrino (HM, Yanagida) CPT Violation?“A desperate remedy…”
CPT Theorem • Based on three assumptions: • Locality • Lorentz invariance • Hermiticity of Hamiltonian • Violation of any one of them: big impact on fundamental physics • Neutrino mass: tiny effect from high-scale physics • Non-commutative geometry? (HM, Yanagida) • Brane world? (Barenboim, Borissov, Lykken, Smirnov)
Implications on Experiments • Mini-BooNE experiment will not see oscillation in neutrino mode, but will in anti-neutrino mode • SNO, Borexino establish LMA, while KamLAND will not see oscillation • Katrin may see endpoint distortion We’ll see!
Mass Spectrum What do we do now?
(1) Dirac Neutrinos: There are new particles, right-handed neutrinos, after all Why haven’t we seen them? Right-handed neutrino must be very very weakly coupled Why? Two ways to go
Extra Dimensions • Right-handed neutrinos SM gauge singlet • Can propagate in the “bulk” • Makes neutrino mass small (Arkani-Hamed, Dimopoulos, Dvali, March-Russell; Dienes, Dudas, Gherghetta; Grossman, Neubert) • mn ~ 1/R if one extra dim R~10mm • An infinite tower of sterile neutrinos • Need also inter-generational mixing now
(2) Majorana Neutrinos: There are no new light particles Why if I pass a neutrino and look back? Must be right-handed anti-neutrinos No fundamental distinction between neutrinos and anti-neutrinos! Two ways to go
Seesaw Mechanism • Why is neutrino mass so small? • Need right-handed neutrinos to generate neutrino mass , but nR SM neutral To obtain m3~(Dm2atm)1/2, mD~mt, M3~1015GeV (GUT!)
electromagnetic, weak, and strong forces have very different strengths But their strengths become the same at 1016 GeV if supersymmetry To obtain m3~(Dm2atm)1/2, mD~mt M3~1015GeV! Grand Unification M3 Dimopoulos, Raby, Wilczek Neutrino mass may be probing unification: Einstein’s dream
Big-Bang NucleosynthesisCosmic Microwave Background (Thuan, Izatov) (Burles, Nollett, Turner)
Baryon AsymmetryEarly Universe 10,000,000,001 10,000,000,000 They basically have all annihilated away except a tiny difference between them
Baryon AsymmetryCurrent Universe us 1 They basically have all annihilated away except a tiny difference between them
Sakharov’s Conditionsfor Baryogenesis • Necessary requirements for baryogenesis: • Baryon number violation • CP violation • Non-equilibrium G(DB>0) > G(DB<0) • Possible new consequences in • Proton decay • CP violation
Original GUT Baryogenesis • GUT necessarily breaks B. • A GUT-scale particle X decays out-of-equilibrium with direct CP violation • Now direct CP violation observed: e’! • But keeps B–L0 “anomaly washout” • Also monopole problem
Actually, SM violates B (but not B–L). In Early Universe (T > 200GeV), W/Z are massless and fluctuate in W/Z plasma Energy levels for left-handed quarks/leptons fluctuate correspon-dingly DL=DQ=DQ=DQ=DB=1 B=L=0 Anomaly washout
Two Main Directions • BL0 gets washed out at T>TEW~174GeV • Electroweak Baryogenesis(Kuzmin, Rubakov, Shaposhnikov) • Start with B=L=0 • First-order phase transition non-equilibrium • Try to create BL0 • Leptogenesis(Fukugita, Yanagida) • Create L0 somehow from L-violation • Anomaly partially converts L to B
Leptogenesis • You generate Lepton Asymmetry first. • Generate L from the direct CP violation in right-handed neutrino decay • Two generations enough for CP violation because of Majorana nature (choose 1 & 3) • L gets converted to B via EW anomaly More matter than anti-matter We have survived “The Great Annihilation”
Does Leptogenesis Work? • Much more details worked out (Buchmüller, Plümacher; Pilaftsis) • ~1010 GeV nR OK • Some tension with supersymmetry because of unwanted gravitino overproduction • Ways around: coherent oscillation of right-handed sneutrino (HM, Yanagida+Hamaguchi)
Some tension with supersymmetry: unwanted gravitino overproduction gravitino decay dissociates light nuclei destroys the success of Big-Bang Nucleosynthesis Need TRH<109 GeV Does Leptogenesis Work? • (Kawasaki, Kohri, Moroi)
Coherent oscillation of right-handed sneutrino (Bose-Einstein condensate) (HM, Yanagida+Hamaguchi) Inflation ends with a large sneutrino amplitude Starts oscillation dominates the Universe Its decay produces asymmetry Consistent with observed oscillation pattern isocurvature fluctuation ~10-7 Leptogenesis Works!
Can we prove it experimentally? • We studied this question at Snowmass2001 (Ellis, Gavela, Kayser, HM, Chang) • Unfortunately, no: it is difficult to reconstruct relevant CP-violating phases from neutrino data • But: we will probably believe it if • 0nbb found • CP violation found in neutrino oscillation • EW baryogenesis ruled out Archeological evidences
Conclusions • Neutrinos are weird • Strong evidence for neutrino mass • Small but finite neutrino mass: • Need drastic ideas to understand it • If Majorana, neutrino mass may be responsible for our existence • A lot more to learn in the next few years