1 / 33

CVN OPS ADMIN Officer Course

CVN OPS ADMIN Officer Course. 30 June 2014. Introduction. This presentation covers the following topics:. OPS Admin Course. Background Metrics Overview Assessments Reporting Rules DRRS-N Accounts Training Keys to Success. Background – DRRS Background.

quamar-barker
Download Presentation

CVN OPS ADMIN Officer Course

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CVN OPS ADMIN Officer Course 30 June 2014

  2. Introduction This presentation covers the following topics: OPS Admin Course Background Metrics Overview Assessments Reporting Rules DRRS-N Accounts Training Keys to Success

  3. Background – DRRS Background • DRRS provides a single, standardized DoD readiness reporting system based on Mission Essential Tasks (METs) • DRRS improves the assessment, visibility, and force management of our forces/organizations • DRRS is used by all services to report readiness to DoD and Joint Staff and is commonly referred to as DRRS-S (DRRS Strategic)

  4. Background – Mission Essential Tasks • METs are tasks considered essential to accomplish and support missions and requirements assigned by a Joint or Naval Commander • The Mission Essential Task List (METL) is based on the Unit’s ROC/POE and maps tasks to capability areas • Capability Areas = Warfare Mission Areas from the ROC/POE • CVN reports on all ROC/POE Warfare Areas • Each MET contains a set of conditions and standards • The METL is common to all units within a Responsible Organization (RespOrg)

  5. Background – DRRS-N • DRRS-N is the tool Navy organizations uses to report MET readiness data to DRRS • Navy DRRS-N Policy Guidance • NTRP 1-03.5 • OPNAV 3501.360 • CNAP/CNAL 3500.38 Note: All references can be found in the Resources tab of the CNAF Readiness Reference Tool

  6. Background – DRRS-N Data Flow DRRS-N is comprised of a network of interdependent systems, architectures, databases, and applications. The network provides the means for reporting readiness data when Ashore or Afloat.

  7. Background – CVN Sample (DRRS-N Ashore)

  8. Background – CVN Sample (DRRS-N Afloat)

  9. Background – DRRS-N • DRRS-N contains two assessments: • Computed Assessment (Automated) • PESTO Pillars (Per, Eqp, Sup, Tng, Ord) • Pre-calculated data from authoritative data sources • PESTO data feeds a SORTSREPNV worksheet that is submitted through DRRS-N in the legacy DRRS-N Afloat program • Commander’s Assessments (Subjective) • The Commander shall assess Core, Capability Areas, and all METs • PESTO Pillar data is provided to assist the Commander in making an assessment • The Commander’s Core, Capability Area, and MET assessments are the only data that flow up beyond Navy lifelines to DRRS • Note: DRRS-N has two similar software input tools, DRRS-N Ashore (used when land based) and DRRS-N Afloat (used by ships and embarked units)

  10. Metrics Overview – DRRS-N Data Sources DRRS-N compiles unit resource values (called FOMs or Figures of Merit), using authoritative data sources. These values and associated data are available to the Commander as a guide for making unit assessments.

  11. Metrics Overview – PESTO Metrics

  12. Assessments – Types • The Commander assesses the following areas with a Y, Q, or N: • The MET • The Capability Area • The Core • In addition, the Commander shall update the OARS (Organization and Resource Status) data. OARS will be discussed later. 3 2 Commander’s Assessments 1 4

  13. Assessments – Values The following values are used when assessing the Core, Capability Area, and MET assessment blocks: Commander’s Assessments

  14. Assessments – Values The following values are used when assessing the Core, Capability Area, and MET assessment blocks: Y – Yes (Green) The unit can successfully perform an assigned Capability or MET to the prescribed standards and conditions. A “Yes” assessment should reflect demonstrated performance in training and operations.

  15. Assessments – Values The following values are used when assessing the Core, Capability Area, and MET assessment blocks: Q – Qualified Yes (Yellow) (Used when data may not readily support a “Yes” assessment). The unit is expected to accomplish an assigned Capability or MET to the prescribed standards, under most conditions. This performance, however, has not been observed or demonstrated in operations or training. Units with this rating can be employed for those tasks.

  16. Assessments – Values The following values are used when assessing the Core, Capability Area, and MET assessment blocks: N – No (Red) The unit cannot perform an assigned Capability or MET to the prescribed standards and conditions at this time. Supporting explanations are mandatory for any “N” assessment.

  17. Assessments – TYCOM Guidance • Fleet guidance on making assessments in DRRS-N: • The Core assessment shall not be green if either MOB or CCC Capabilities are assessed less than green • The commander’s assessment shall not be green in MOB and Core if .. • an engineering casualty exists that limits speed or maneuverability • if onboard fuel percentage or days of provisions are less than prescribed by fleet or operational commanders • The overall MOB Capability Area shall be assessed as no better than the worst assessment of any individual mob capability area • The commander’s assessment shall not be green in any NMET or Capability Area affected by an active Cat 3 or Cat 4 CASREP • The commander’s assessment shall not be green for any Capability Area if a unit fails to complete the full training requirement or fails to achieve required certification for any phase of the FRTP • The commander’s assessment shall not be green for any NMET or Capability Area where shipboard ordnance load is less than 80% of shipfill or other requirement directed by echelon two fleet commanders

  18. Assessments – TYCOM Guidance • Guidance on CASREPS: • CASREPS are specific indicators of "change in readiness status" and require updates to DRRS-N. The category of the CASREP shall never be worse than the worst mission area Affected. • For example, if a unit submits a C3 CASREP, there must be at least one capability (mission area) evaluated as “Q/Qualified Yes." the qualified statement should be in the area(s) impacted by the C3 CASREP. • Listing all CASREPS in the assessment fields is not desired. Upper echelon commands have access to MFOM and can view all CASREP summaries. Keep comments focused on operational impacts to mission areas.

  19. Assessments – Information Assurance (IA) • In November 2012, USFFC required units reporting NTA 5.5.5 (Perform Information Assurance) in DRRS-N to report the status of specific IA requirements and readiness • The guidance is outlined in USFFC message R132210Z NOV 12 (A copy is in the reference library) • The USFFC guidance requires the following unit level action items: • The status of IA related training, server scans, and server software patches in the remarks block for NTA 5.5.5 (template available at http://.www.fleetforces.navy.smil.mil/cyberfor/n4/default) • The Commander’s Assessment for NTA 5.5.5 is dependant on the unit’s site accreditation, completion of IAVA scans, and percent of server patches applied

  20. Assessments – Commander’s Remarks • The Core assessment block contains specific sections for your comments: • Overall Section: Describe the unit’s current readiness in relation to the wartime mission and ability to conduct current tasking • PESTO Sections: Describe the specific readiness issues and operational impacts • Comments should focus on current and future capability and issues • Projections on readiness changes should be based on events and not just the next DRRS-N assessment • Minimum comments should include; • Current FRTP (R+) month/phase • Next major FRTP milestone • Expected deployment date • Commander’s top readiness concerns Note: Since only the Commander’s assessment and comments go up to DRRS, remarks about PESTO pillar data should be submitted to CNAF N40 via other means.

  21. Assessments – Commander’s Remarks • PESTO Remarks • Comment on IAs and TADs that cause personnel shortages • Comment on Equipment degradations and all CAT 4 CASREPS • Comment on Supply shortages and planned on-loads • Comment on Training issues and when events will be achieved • Comment on Ordnance status and on-loads • General Remarks Tips • All comments should describe the readiness degradation, the CO’s plan to resolve it, and resources required to achieve Green • This is not a message so use sentence case • DRRS-N is about full MCO capability. Describe how current tasking effects MCO readiness • Do not use SORTS terminology in DRRS-N comments

  22. Assessments – SORTSREPNV Data Reporting • In addition to the MET assessments, the Commander shall update the OARS data. • CJCS has not released the component services from their responsibility to report SORTSREPNV data • USFF includes the OARS data in DRRS-N to capture legacy SORTSREPNV data • OARS transmits SORTSREPNV data along with the DRRS-N assessment and creates a SORTSREPNV report internal to the larger DRRS-S network for use at Joint Staff 3 2 Commander’s Assessments 1 4

  23. DRRS-N Ashore – OARS Data Calculations Everyone with a DRRS-N account can view your OARS data. To update the data in the OARS page, select the Edit buttons or by click on the C Rate boxes. Note: The guidance for completing the OARS data is contained in Section 6 of the CNAP/CNAL 3500.38

  24. Assessments – OARS Data Calculations • When the user selects either Edit buttons or clicks on the C rate boxes, a data entry • screen will appear. Complete the data fields required. • Report current employment via the Activity Code sets • Report deployment status using the pull-down menu • C Rates should be consistent with the commander’s assessed (DRRS-N) values

  25. Assessments – OARS Data Calculations • Report the ship’s LAT/LONG when home or MODLOC when at sea • Category Level and Limitations are N/A for CNAP/CNAL units • Percent Effective is your readiness to perform your currently assigned mission (1-4) • Report Chem-Bio stats as per sections 6 of the CNAP/CNAL 3500.38 • Report BA/NMP/COB for all officers/enlisted in the Personnel Strength boxes

  26. Reporting Rules - Frequency • Submit assessments in DRRS-N as follows: • Within 24 hours of a significant change in readiness • Within 24 hours of an unplanned change in underway status • fail to sail • hurricane sortie • surge deployment • RTP for emergent repairs • Within 30 days of the last assessment • Following completion of major FRTP milestones to include TSTA, FEP, C2X, and JTFEX • When otherwise directed Note: Your ISIC may also direct a DRRS-N assessment based on COCOM or Fleet Commander reporting requirement.

  27. DRRS-N Accounts • DRRS-N Ashore • Requested via the SIPRNET (https://drrsn.ffc.navy.smil.mil/drrsn) • Accounts are Managed by USFFC • At best, OPS and OPS Admin should have Commander permissions • Help Desk: 757-836-6365 (DSN 836) • Email: drrsn@navy.mil • DRRS-N Afloat • Primarily where you will make DRRS-N assessments • OPS ADMIN on the CVN creates accounts for all embarked units • Help Desk: 757-836-5241/6365 (DSN 836) • Email: drrsn@navy.mil • Tips • Embarked staffs have to make their own watch lists (groups) • CVW staff also must make a watch list to view the DRRS-N CARR (Carrier Air Wing Readiness Report)

  28. DRRS-N Accounts – Permissions Account permission levels for both DRRS-N Ashore and Afloat have the same functionality but have different names. The table below describes the permission levels. CNAF recommends that the CO, XO, and OPS-O all have the Commander/Releaser permission level. The CO Has the discretion to assign any permission level to personnel in their command. DRRS-N Ashore/Afloat Permission Levels:

  29. CNAF Readiness Brief (CVN) Both CNAP and CNAL present a bi-monthly readiness brief to CNAL N00 using DRRS-N readiness data. The CVN pages are organized by FRTP phase. Comments on the Readiness Brief come directly from the unit’s DRRS-N assessment.

  30. Training Plan – Methods Three avenues for DRRS-N training are: • On-line and embedded training • CNAF Readiness Reference Tool • Help functions in DRRS-N • Pipeline training • TYCOM OPS ADMIN Officer Course • Waterfront briefs • Quarterly at Fleet Concentration sites • As requested by units

  31. Keys to Success • Unit commander gets 100% of the vote in the Commander’s assessment regardless of the PESTO pillars • The unit needs to understand their FRTP cycle and their readiness expectations • Remarks should be focused on readiness issues for your ship • Do not use SORTS terminology in your remarks • Ensure that all remarks fields are continually updated • Old remarks remain in DRRS-N until updated • Evaluate all METs, Capability Areas, Core, and OARS data on every assessment • OARS data should match the current DRRS-N Capability Area assessments • Manage the input systems that feed DRRS-N (FLTMPS, CSMP, CV-SHARP, etc.) • Take advantage of the TYCOM experts. Help is a phone call away

  32. CNAF DRRS-N Pillar Leads CDR Nate “Dude” Ogle Program Manager 757-322-3325 Mr John OlanowskiP Pillar 757-444-2640 Mr Tom WorthenE Pillar 619-545-1508 CWO3 BunkerS Pillar 757-444-4472 LCDR Wendy ThrelkeldT Pillar/METL 619-545-1411 Mr Bill GlennO Pillar 757-444-3771 Training Support Leads Mr Chris SolerDRRS-N Training 757-322-3327 Mr Rick LeekerMFOM Training 202-488-1501 x222 Maxalex Fequiere CV-SHARP Training 757-708-6158 Note: All POC information is listed in the Resources tab of the CNAF Readiness Reference Tool

  33. QUESTIONS?

More Related