100 likes | 259 Views
PBAC Decision. Levinia Crooks. Declarations of Interest. Levinia Crooks has no conflicts to declare and has not been assisted to attend any conferences or meetings
E N D
PBAC Decision Levinia Crooks
Declarations of Interest • Levinia Crooks has no conflicts to declare and has not been assisted to attend any conferences or meetings • She sits on the Judging Panel for the Gilead Sciences Fellowship Research Grants Program, honoraria in respect of this activity are donated to the ASHM Gift Fund
The role of PBAC • Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee determines subsidy for drugs. Therapeutic Drugs Administration decides what drugs come into Australia. • PBAC set the CD4 >500 level for subsidy in between the time of ”hit hard-hit early” and the identification of toxicities. • Had the meeting been 6 months earlier the level would probably have been CD4 <750 and had it been 6 months later probably CD4 <350
PBAC Decision • Initial treatment of HIV infection in combination with other antiretroviral agents, in a patient who is antiretroviral treatment naïve following diagnosed HIV infection. • Continuing treatment of HIV infection in combination with other antiretroviral agents where the patient has previously received PBS-subsidised therapy for HIV infection. • The PBAC noted that the requested restriction would allow the initiation of ART at a CD4+ count >500 cells/mm3 for patients with HIV, irrespective of the presence of symptomatic disease.
Request • To remove the CD4+ cell count restriction for initiation of first line anti-retroviral therapy (ART) in asymptomatic, ART naïve HIV positive patients.
Economic Analysis • The PBAC considered that although the economic model had limitations, it was as accurate a depiction of the cost effectiveness as could be generated with the clinical data available.
Usage and Financial Implications • The PBAC considered that not all patients diagnosed with HIV infection would automatically start ART. Factors including age, adherence, preparedness and awareness of the lifelong commitment to therapy will all impact on the patient and physician decision to initiate treatment. • The PBAC agreed that the decision to initiate treatment is individualised and that people living with HIV in Australia are managed by a relatively small number of clinicians who are specifically trained to become Section 100 Highly Specialised Drug prescribers of ART. This promotes a relatively standardised approach to initiating and monitoring ART.
Rationale for Decision • The PBAC noted that the potential benefits of removing the CD4+ count restriction include: • Reduced transmission of HIV infection • Individualisation of patient therapy • Empowering patients to be able to choose when to commence therapy • The PBAC considered there to be an advantage to patients associated with being able to have greater choice, together with their prescribers, of when to initiate therapy with ART. The PBAC considered this greater choice to represent good Quality Use of Medicines.
Implementation • The PBAC released the Public Summary Document on 7 March 2014, which is available at http://www.pbs.gov.au/info/industry/listing/elements/pbac-meetings/psd • The change will come into effect with the release of the 1 April 2014 PBS Schedule of Pharmaceutical Benefits “Yellow Book”
New ART S100 prescribing criteria • Initial treatment of HIV infection in combination with other antiretroviral agents, in a patient who is antiretroviral treatment naïve following diagnosed HIV infection. • Continuing treatment of HIV infection in combination with other antiretroviral agents where the patient has previously received PBS-subsidised therapy for HIV infection.