1 / 44

U npacking the B aggage of disproportionate representation of minority children in special education

U npacking the B aggage of disproportionate representation of minority children in special education. Presented by, Ben Ditkowsky, Ph.D. Mrs. Elouise Jones. Introduction. Disproportionate Representation of minority children in special education is : Over-identification,

queenie
Download Presentation

U npacking the B aggage of disproportionate representation of minority children in special education

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Unpacking the Baggage of disproportionate representation of minority children in special education Presented by, Ben Ditkowsky, Ph.D. Mrs. Elouise Jones

  2. Introduction • Disproportionate Representation of minority children in special education is: • Over-identification, • under-identification, or • misidentification, • Disproportionate Representation of minority children means children are: • Placed in an environment that is more restrictive than what would be in the educational best interest of the child (mis-served), or • underserved • Disproportionate Representation of minority children can lead to: • inappropriate educational placement and • educational failure.

  3. The beliefs and realities of disproportionate representation All minorities are overrepresented in sp ed Belief The data indicate: Compared to Caucasian students, African American and Native American students are overrepresented, Hispanic and Asian/Pacific Islander students are underrepresented Belief A large percentage of black and Native American students are in special education. The data indicate : Overall rates are slightly higher. Caucasian=12.1%; Native American=13.1% ; African American =14.2% Belief Hispanic students are overrepresented The data indicate : Hispanic students are slightly underrepresented

  4. The beliefs and realities of disproportionate representation The greatest degree of disproportional representation occurs with African American students Belief The data indicate: students who are Asian/Pacific Islander are underrepresented by a much larger degree that African Americanstudents are overrepresented Belief IQ tests cause overrepresentation The data indicate : Many reasons exist to eliminate IQ tests, but they have little overall effect on overrepresentation

  5. National Status for All Disability Categories

  6. Legal Perspective • Hobson vs. Hanson (1967) • Maintained that tracking denied equal education for minorities. • Diana vs. CA State Board Of Education (1970) • Non-discriminatory testing provision (i.e., testing done in native language). • Guadalupe vs. Tempe (1972) • Upheld non-discriminatory testing. • Lau vs. Nichols (1974) • Again, Non-discriminatory testing; San Francisco LEP students. • Larry P. vs. Riles (1972, 1979, 1984) • Barred use of IQ scores as sole determiner of student placement.

  7. Legal Perspective • PASE vs. Hannon (1980) • Upheld the use of IQ test scores BUT • other assessment measures used, too. • Lee vs. Macon (1967, Alabama - Paolino, 2002) • 2000 decision, mandated “mechanisms to correct:” • African American overrepresentation in MR, ED. • Underrepresentation in areas of LD, gifted. • One of the longest active cases on record.

  8. Individuals with Disabilities Education ACT (IDEA, 1997) 34 CFR 300.755: Disproportionality. (a) General. Each State that receives assistance under Part B of the Act, and the Secretary of the Interior, shall provide for the collection and examination of data to determine if significant disproportionality based on race is occurring in the State or in the schools operated by theSecretary of the Interior with respect to – 34 CFR 300.755: Disproportionality. (a) General. Each State that receives assistance under Part B of the Act, and the Secretary of the Interior, shall provide for the collection and examination of data to determine if significant disproportionality based on race is occurring in the State or in the schools operated by theSecretary of the Interior with respect to –

  9. Individuals with Disabilities Improvement Act 2004 • IDEA 2004 requires that states have policies and procedures in effect to prevent the inappropriate identification or disproportionate representation of children with disabilities by race and ethnicity,. • IDEA 2004 requires that states have policies and procedures in effect to prevent the inappropriate identification or disproportionate representation of children with disabilities by race and ethnicity,.

  10. What might be wrong with disproportionate representation? • The Potential of negative effects of stigmatizing labels, • Limited access to general education settings, and curriculum • There is no consistent and conclusive evidence that special education programs are effective! Losen & Orfield, 2002 ; Hosp & Reschly, 2003

  11. A visual aid (to represent our children)

  12. A visual aid (to represent our children) Students who require intensive support (i.e., Special Education) Students who require additional support (i.e., Title 1 etc…) General Education Students

  13. Common indices of representation The index used depends on the question we ask… • Composition Index • What percent of Special Education students are Ethnic X? • Risk Index • What percent of Ethnic X children are in special education? • Risk Ratio • How likely is it that Ethnic X children are identified as needing special education as compared to Caucasian children?

  14. The statistics of over - representation I think you need to be more explicit about step two?

  15. Composition Index The composition index is calculated by dividing the number of students in a given racial or ethnic group by the total special education student enrollment. Composition = Index Students in Special Education who are Ethnic X ALL Students who are in Special Education

  16. Composition Index The Composition Index only looks at the composition of Special Education Let’s say there are 80 students in special education 36 of those students are Ethnic X In this example, 45% of special education students are Ethnic X The Composition index is 45%.

  17. Does 45% indicate disproportionate representation? If 45% of the special education population is Ethnic X, it could mean • There are many children who are Ethnic X in the district. • The children in the district who are Ethnic X are mostly in special education Do we have enough information?

  18. Risk Index The risk index is calculated by dividing the number of students in a given racial or ethnic group by the total enrollment for that racial or ethnic group in the school population. Risk = Students in Special Education who are Ethnic X Students who are Ethnic X

  19. Risk Index (example) • Let’s say 165 of students are Ethnic X • The Risk Index(for Ethnic X students)would be calculated as Ethnic X students in Sp Ed Risk = All Ethnic X students 36 X students in Sp Ed Risk = 165 X students Risk = 21.8% Ethnic X students in Sp Ed Risk = All Ethnic X students

  20. Does 21.8% indicate disproportionate representation? If 21.8% of the Ethnic X population is in special education, it could mean • One in five children who Ethnic X are in special education in the district. Do we have enough information?

  21. Risk Ratio (Odds Ratio) The risk ratio is a comparative index of risk. It is the preferred indicator of disproportionate representation by the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP).

  22. Ethnic X students in Sp Ed All Ethnic X students Caucasian students in Sp Ed All Caucasian students RISK RATIO (Odds Ratio) The risk ratio is calculated by dividing the risk index of one racial or ethnic group by the risk index of another group. Risk Ratio = [ ] Risk index for X [ ] Risk index for C

  23. Risk Ratio (Odds Ratio) There are proportionally more Ethnic X students in Sp. Ed than Caucasian students. • With our example data, Let’s say that • Approximately 12.8% of Caucasian students are in special education • We have seen that 21.8% of Ethnic X students are in special education…. • The risk ratio would be calculated as… 21.8% Ethnic X Risk Ratio = 12.8% Caucasian Risk Ratio = 1.70

  24. How to Interpret the Risk Ratio (Odds Ratio) • 1.0 means equal risk, this is ideal • Values greater than 1.0 • begin to suggest “over-representation”, • but some variation is expected • 2.0 or more means significant over-identification is likely • Statistics are available to determine precisely when the risk ratio can not be explained by chance.

  25. Disproportionate representation Could this be correct?

  26. Disproportionate representation National Trends for Mental Retardation (MR) • Composition: • 35% of students identified as MR are African American; • 17% of the overall student population is African-American • Risk: • 2.6% of African Americans are identified as MR • 1.1% of Caucasian students • Risk Ratio (Odds Ratio): • Rate for African Americans is 2.4 times higher than that of Caucasian Students • No other groups are overrepresented in MR www.ideadata.org

  27. Disproportionate representation National Trends for Emotional Disturbance (ED) • Composition: • 26.4% of students identified as ED are African American; • 17% of the overall student population is African-American • Risk: • 1.6% of African Americans are identified as ED • Risk Ratio (Odds Ratio): • Rate for African Americans is 1.6 times higher than that of Caucasian Students • No other groups are overrepresented in ED www.ideadata.org

  28. Disproportionate representation National Trends for Learning Disabilities (LD) • Composition: • 1.37% of students identified as LD are Native American Indian; • 1.1 % of the overall student population is Native American Indian • Risk: • 7.3% of Native American Indian are identified as LD • 6.1% of Caucasian students • Risk Ratio (Odds Ratio): • Rate for Native American Indians is 1.2 times higher than that of Caucasian Students • No other groups are overrepresented in LD www.ideadata.org

  29. What is disproportionate representation in Illinois? • To determine significant disproportionality ISBE plans to utilize multiple measures over time to identify districts with disproportionate representation • The ISBE plan is to use a Risk Ratio to determine disproportionality • A significant disproportionality is considered a weighted risk ratio of 2.0 or higher for any racial/ethnic group (North Central Regional Resource Center; NCRRC). • weighted risk ratio for districts with an enrollment of greater than 1000 students; • and alternate risk ratio for districts with an enrollment of less than 1000 students. • Illinois plans to utilize a tiered approach to intervention with districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification. http://www.isbe.state.il.us/spec-ed/pdfs/state_performance.pdf

  30. BASELINE Trend in Illinois (African American) • Trends are fairly stable • But increasing slightly… • AA students are around 1.2 to 1.3 times as likely to be identified as special education compared to Caucasian counterparts

  31. BASELINE Trend in Illinois (Hispanic) • Trends are fairly stable • Rapidly increasing • While Hispanic students less likely than thier Caucasian counterparts to be identified for Special Education, this trendappears to be changing

  32. BASELINE Trend in Illinois (Asian)

  33. BASELINE Trend in Illinois (Native American)

  34. BASELINE Trend in Illinois (Caucasian)

  35. BASELINE Trend for Emotional Disorder in Illinois (African American)

  36. BASELINE Trend for Mental Retardation in Illinois (African American)

  37. BASELINE Trend for Specific Learning Disabilityin Illinois (African American)

  38. Is there disproportionate representation in Illinois? • African American students appear to be far more likely to be identified as • Mentally Retarded • Emotionally Disturbed and • to a lesser extent Learning Disabled than their Caucasian counterparts

  39. Why? Factors Contributing to Disproportionate Representation School level factors: • ineffective academic curriculum and behavioral supports • inadequate instructional and classroom management skills • poor support and referral systems for students at risk • insufficient support for teachers working with culturally diverse groups

  40. Why? Factors Contributing to Disproportionate Representation Other Factors: • Effects of poverty • Limited English proficiency • Residence in inner cities • Race/ethnicity factors that contribute to referrals, testing, and incorrect placement of children from racial and ethnic minorities in special education classes

  41. The Achievement Gap • Overrepresented minority students • Lower academic readiness for school, print familiarity, letter knowledge, word knowledge, vocabulary • Lower behavioral readiness for school as rated by minority and white students • Gaps in achievement persist Hart and Risley, 1995

  42. Disproportionality Prevention “ There is substantial evidence with regard to both behavior and achievement that early identification and intervention is more effective than later identification and intervention.” Executive Summary, p. 5 Donovan, M. S., & Cross, C. T. (2002). Minority students in special and gifted education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

  43. HOW?? Multi-tier academic and behavioral interventions • High quality reading and math programs • School wide positive behavior supports • Focused interventions for small groups • Effective classroom management • Intensive problem solving

  44. Disproportionality Prevention • History of Efforts • No magic bullets • No magic tests or adjustments to tests • No simple solutions • Solutions • Early Intervention • Directly address achievement gaps, • Provide supportive behavior programs • Apply validated intervention principles

More Related