1 / 21

Somjin Phiakoksong Visit Weawsungnoen and Waraporn Eoaskoon

Somjin Phiakoksong Visit Weawsungnoen and Waraporn Eoaskoon e-mail : {somjin, visit, waraporn}@sut.ac.th. Relation of selected factors affect teaching efficiency: A case study of Suranaree University of Technology. Outline. Background Research methodology Objectives Process Methods

quentin-good
Download Presentation

Somjin Phiakoksong Visit Weawsungnoen and Waraporn Eoaskoon

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Somjin Phiakoksong Visit Weawsungnoen and Waraporn Eoaskoon e-mail : {somjin, visit, waraporn}@sut.ac.th Relation of selected factors affect teaching efficiency:A case study of Suranaree University of Technology

  2. Outline • Background • Research methodology • Objectives • Process • Methods • Data preparation • Data analysis • Results & conclusion

  3. Background • Suranaree University of Technology (SUT) is the first public autonomous university. • SUT has unique identity in teaching and learning system. • trimester system. • sharing educational resources. • Laboratory • Classroom building complex: class size 60- 1,500 students • Center of library and educational media • Center of computer services

  4. Background (Cont.) • SUT organizes the system of student assessment towards satisfaction on teaching • The results of teaching assessment are reported confidentially to each teacher and Dean for improvement • The meeting as university mission in every trimester is to overview and discuss the results of teaching assessment aiming to development of teaching and related issues • This study is a section of this report

  5. Objectives • Study the relation of selected factors which affect the teaching quality. • Four Selected Factors : • Academic position • Working years • Work status • Class sizes

  6. Methods Evaluation forms using 4 point scales Data gathering at the end of each trimester Data for analysis collected from 2nd trimester (1,682 records)

  7. Data preparation

  8. Data preparation

  9. Data preparation

  10. Data preparation

  11. Data analysis Upper scores Theory Chi-square Academic position Middle scores Lower scores Work years Practices One way ANOVA Work status Raw scores Seminar/ Project Class sizes t-test

  12. Results Chi-square = 53.71, df = 8, p-value = 0.000* Chi-square = 53.71, df = 8, p-value = 0.000* Relation of Academic position and types of teaching :

  13. Results Relation of Academic position and types of teaching :

  14. Results Relation of Academic position and types of teaching :

  15. Results Chi-square = 21.440, df = 2, p-value = 0.000* Chi-square = 8.634, df = 2, p-value = 0.013* Relation of Work status and types of teaching :

  16. Results Relation of Work status and types of teaching :

  17. Results Relation of Work status and types of teaching :

  18. Results Chi-square = 56.271, df = 6, p-value = 0.000* Relation of Class sizes and types of teaching :

  19. Results Relation of Class sizes and types of teaching :

  20. Conclusion Four selected factors affected the teaching quality : • Academic position and theory and practical sessions • All Instructor (Prof., Assoc.Prof., Assist.Prof. and Instructor) got higher scores than other instructor • Work status and practical session • Full-time instructors got higher scores than part-time instructors • Class size and theory sessions Class of 1-60 and 61-150 students got higher scores than of 151-300 and 301 students ups • Number of work years did not affect the teaching quality.

  21. Questions ?

More Related