1 / 34

Control of Struvite Deposition in Wastewater Treatment Plants

Control of Struvite Deposition in Wastewater Treatment Plants. Paul L. Bishop Associate Vice President for Research University of Cincinnati 11 th Annual Central States Water Environment Association Education Conference April 4, 2006. Typical Municipal WWTP Flow Diagram. Problems.

quiana
Download Presentation

Control of Struvite Deposition in Wastewater Treatment Plants

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Control of Struvite Deposition in Wastewater Treatment Plants Paul L. Bishop Associate Vice President for Research University of Cincinnati 11th Annual Central States Water Environment Association Education Conference April 4, 2006

  2. Typical Municipal WWTP Flow Diagram

  3. Problems • Anaerobic sludge digestion releases ammonium, magnesium and phosphate, which can form struvite in digesters and downstream dewatering facilities • Can result in scaling in pipelines and on walls of process equipment • Centrate or filtrate from sludge dewatering is usually returned to the plant headworks where it can add to the wastewater burden

  4. Magnesium ammonium phosphate MgNH4PO4· 6H2O Named after Russian diplomat, H.G. von Struve (1772-1851) White, yellowish white, or brownish white in color FW = 245.41 Specific density = 1.7 Very insoluble in water, pKso = 12.6 – 13.15 at 25oC Struvite

  5. Struvite Chemistry • NH4+Û NH3 (aq) + H+ pKa=9.3 • H3PO4Û H2PO4- + H+ pKa1= 2.1 • H2PO4-Û HPO42- + H+ pKa2= 7.2 • HPO42-Û PO43- + H+ pKa3= 12.3 • MgOH+Û Mg2+ + OH- pK=2.56 • MgNH4PO4.6H2O Û Mg2+ + NH4+ +PO43- + 6H2O pK=12.6 Struvite formation occurs when the conditions are such that the concentration product exceeds the struvite conditional solubility product

  6. Conditional Solubility of Struvite vs pH Ps = conditional solubility product Kso = solubility product CT,Mg = total concentration of all soluble magnesium species CT,NH3 = total concentration of all soluble ammonia species CT,PO4 = total concentration of all soluble phosphate species "i = ionization fraction for component i gi = activity coefficient for component i

  7. Struvite Formation in Sludge Dewatering Process Anaerobically digested sludge, anaerobic supernatant (centrate/filtrate) Mixing & perturbations Carbon dioxide stripping pH elevation Phosphate equilibrium shifts towards PO43- [Mg2+] [NH4+][PO43-] exceeds struvite solubility product (super-saturation) Nucleation and crystal growth Struvite precipitates

  8. MgNH4PO4 . 6H2O Productivity lost!! Ball check Filtrate return line Struvite encrusted roller (Courtesy Schaner’s Waste Water Products, Inc.)

  9. Problems with Current Struvite Control Techniques • Addition of iron chloride to form vivianite (Fe3(PO4)2 . 8H2O) • Chloride concentration increases • Ferric ion acts as an acid, lowering pH • Large volume inorganic sludge generation • Phosphate recovery from ferric phosphate • salt(s) is nearly impossible • Similar problems with ferric sulfate or alum

  10. Objective • Investigate the use of magnesium hydroxide to remove nutrients in a controlled fashion from digested sludge • Can use waste flue gas desulfurization sludge as a source of Mg(OH)2

  11. Characterization of Mg(OH)2: Basic Properties that are Important to Wastewater Treatment Applications

  12. Magnesium HydroxideDissolution Kinetics

  13. Titration Curves of Several Neutralization Chemicals A = calcium hydroxide; B = pure magnesium hydroxide; C = sodium carbonate; D = as-received magnesium hydroxide slurry

  14. Relative Neutralization Capacity and Buffering Capacity of Several Neutralization Reagents (at pH = 8.5) 1 = pure magnesium hydroxide; 2 = sodium carbonate; 3 = calcium hydroxide; 4 = as-received magnesium hydroxide slurry.

  15. Summary • Mg(OH)2 has unique features compared with other commonly used chemicals: • slow dissolution process • high neutralization capacity • high buffering intensity

  16. Sludge Digestion Enhancement Using Mg(OH)2

  17. NH3-N, PO43--P, Mg2+, Ca2+ and SO42- Changes During Anaerobic Sludge Digestion

  18. Biogas Production Profiles During Anaerobic Sludge Digestion

  19. Applying magnesium hydroxide into an anaerobic sludge digester can: Result in greater destruction of COD and SS Enhance the production rate of biogas Increase overall treatment efficiency Reduce level of nutrients in the supernatant that must be returned to the plant’s headworks Increase the nutrient content in the generated biosolids for agricultural use Improved sludge dewaterability, which will ease the operation of the down stream sludge dewatering facilities Summary

  20. Nutrient Removal from Anaerobically Digested Sludge and Sludge Supernatant Using Mg(OH)2

  21. Nutrient Removal from Digested Sludge

  22. Pilot Scale Experimental Results on Phosphate Removal from Centrate

  23. Total phosphorus mass balance without metal phosphate precipitation from centrate/filtrate effluent Influent Primary + secondary treatment systems 310 10 100 300 Sludge digester 300 sludge cake Filtrate/centrate Sludge dewatering 210 90 Total phosphorus mass balance with metal phosphate precipitation from centrate/filtrate effluent Influent Primary + secondary treatment systems 10 100 107 97 Treated filtrate/ centrate 7 Sludge digester 97 sludge cake + chemical sludge Metal phosphate precipitation reactor Filtrate/centrate Sludge dewatering 29 90 68 P-containing chemical sludge 61

  24. Summary • Use of Mg(OH)2 to remove nutrients from anaerobically digested sludge is effective only if the sludge is well digested. • Removing phosphate from the side waste stream will: • reduce the nutrient load to the headworks of the treatment plant (this is a current practice that adversely affects the overall treatment efficiency) • lower the potential for struvite formation, which is a frequently occurring O&M problem in many municipal wastewater treatment plants • generate a slow release fertilizer

  25. Improving the Settleability and Dewaterability of Activated Sludge: Applications of Mg(OH)2

  26. Effect of Mg(OH)2 on Activated Sludge Settleability

  27. Surface Charge Density Changes vs Mg(OH)2 Dosage COO- ---Mg2+ --- -OOC NH3 NH3

  28. Mixed Liquor Sedimentation Curves under Different Mg(OH)2 Dosage Conditions

  29. Sludge Dewaterability Changes with the Addition of Mg(OH)2

  30. Summary • By charge neutralization, sweep flocculation and Mg2+ bridging between the EPS matrices of the microorganisms, Mg(OH)2 is effective in improving the settleability of activated sludge • Besides enhancing the overall sludge digestion process efficiency, Mg(OH)2application to anaerobic sludge digester can also generate a digested sludge that is easier to dewater

  31. Conclusions • Mg(OH)2 improved the biological phosphate uptake and release behavior of activated sludge • Mg2+ was found to stimulate the phosphate uptake during aeration periods • The pH increase caused by Mg(OH)2 addition enhanced phosphate release during the anaerobic sedimentation period • Research results provide supporting evidence for the potential application of Mg(OH)2 in EBPR processes

  32. Conclusions • Magnesium hydroxide can effectively improve the settleability of mixed liquor during sedimentation in secondary clarifier and the dewaterability of anaerobically digested sludge in sludge dewatering • Magnesium hydroxide can enhance the overall process efficiency of anaerobic sludge digestion due to improved pH/alkalinity and the supplementation of Mg2

  33. Conclusions • Magnesium hydroxide is effective in removing nutrients from anaerobic supernatant, thus reducing the nutrient load returned to the headworks of the plant • It minimizes the risk of struvite formation and generates a good plant fertilizer • Magnesium hydroxide is superior to other commonly used chemicals in this regard FeCl3, alum and lime. • Aeration (for mixing) plus magnesium chloride (Mg2+ source) plus struvite seeding proves to be a good process for controlled struvite crystallization.

  34. Potential Mg(OH)2 Application Locations in Municipal WWTP

More Related