250 likes | 313 Views
Side activities by non-farmers Symposium ‘Platteland als consumptieruimte’ 12 april 2012. Marianna Markantoni Department of Cultural Geography, Faculty of Spatial Sciences University of Groningen. What is a side activity?.
E N D
Side activities by non-farmersSymposium ‘Platteland als consumptieruimte’12 april 2012 Marianna Markantoni Department of Cultural Geography, Faculty of Spatial Sciences University of Groningen
What is a side activity? A side activity is a small-scale home-based activity, which provides an extra income at the household level and is carried out in a rural household by non-farmers
Main categories of side activities 1) Services and facilities provision 2) Tourism and recreation 3) Crafts and arts 4) Sale of home-grown products More consumption than production related activities
Why side activities by non-farmers? • Lack of attention • Rural development • Rural policy • Focus of farm diversification of farmers • ‘Invisibility’ of side activities in datasets
Methodology and data collection • Research in 36 municipalities • Survey & in-depth interviews • 560 side activities by non-farmers found 260 surveyed • 269 side activities by farmers counted
Main results: • At the personal level • At the regional level
Motives to start a side activity (open) Personal level
Motives to start a side activity (closed) Personal level Three main type of motives
Personal level ‘I become richer in the inside than in my wallet’
What is the impact of side activities on rural development? Regional level
Regional level Key features of rural develpment(Ilbery 1998; OECD 2008) • Rural economyo Directly- Income- Employmento Indirectly- Local collaborations- Competition- Rural tourism • Social capital • Physical environment
Regional level 1. Direct economic impact Very small 0.009 % of total household income (36 municipalities) Employment generation Sole traders, 2% hire personeel
Indirect economic impact Side activities foster local collaborations Touristic routes Bike routes Walking routes A side activity owner: ‘A groceries shop, a carpenter, a bike shop, they profit from us and we from them. The recreation office in the village is happy with our group accommodation here.’
Regional level 2. Social Impact • ‘I provide a listening ear’ (dog grooming salon) • High level of personal interaction • Fullfil social needs • Municipalities:Social vitality of the rural areasA meeting point for the village
Kiel-Windeweer www.kiel-windeweer.nl
Regional level 3. Physical environment • Small-scale, home-based do not seem to threaten the landscape • BUT 25% of the side activity owners have growth aspirations impact? • Municipalities set preconditions: • Do not clutter (verrommeling) the countryside • No big road sings • Fit with the surroundings • Stay small scale
‘It is not so much the economic contribution of side activities that is important...but their contribution to the social revitalization of rural areas’
Conclusions 1. Personal level: Side activities are an important part of the owner’s lives, needs and identities 2. Regional level: Side activities diversify the rural activities and enhance the social wellbeing in rural areas
‘The importance of side activities is valued more in terms of non-economic than economic returns’
Marianna Markantoni Thank you for your attention! Questions? Westerweelde, group accomodation
Personal level Enabling factors • Rural location (affordability, rural amenities) • Personal/household circumstances: • Multifunctional home • Major life transitions (marriage, parenthood) • Support from family and friends
Indirect economic impact The position of local governments • Side activities broaden the touristic and the recreation sector • Promote local productsDiversify the touristic activities 2) Side activities have a limited influence on tourism They add a ‘little bit’ to tourism They are very small, tourists do not come for these activities
Regional level Policy perspectives • Unclear policies for side activities • Differentiation between farmers-non-farmer’s side activities in policies This study concluded that: • Side activities are not a threat to the landscapeBut attention to those with clear growth intentions • Raise awareness of the contribution of side activities for the revitalization and diversification of rural areas