250 likes | 314 Views
2620001 Data Structures. Nonlinear Data Structure (AVL Tree). Balanced and unbalanced BST. 1. 4. 2. 2. 5. 3. 1. 3. 4. 4. Is this “balanced”?. 5. 2. 6. 6. 1. 3. 5. 7. 7. Approaches to balancing trees. Don't balance May end up with some nodes very deep Strict balance
E N D
2620001Data Structures Nonlinear Data Structure (AVL Tree)
Balanced and unbalanced BST 1 4 2 2 5 3 1 3 4 4 Is this “balanced”? 5 2 6 6 1 3 5 7 7
Approaches to balancing trees • Don't balance • May end up with some nodes very deep • Strict balance • The tree must always be balanced perfectly • Pretty good balance • Only allow a little out of balance • Adjust on access • Self-adjusting
Balancing Binary Search Trees • Many algorithms exist for keeping binary search trees balanced • Adelson-Velskii and Landis (AVL) trees (height-balanced trees) • Splay trees and other self-adjusting trees • B-trees and other multiway search trees
Perfect Balance • Want a complete tree after every operation • tree is full except possibly in the lower right • This is expensive • For example, insert 2 in the tree on the left and then rebuild as a complete tree 6 5 Insert 2 & complete tree 4 9 2 8 1 5 8 1 4 6 9
AVL - Good but not Perfect Balance • AVL trees are height-balanced binary search trees • Balance factor of a node • height(left subtree) - height(right subtree) • An AVL tree has balance factor calculated at every node • For every node, heights of left and right subtree can differ by no more than 1 • Store current heights in each node
Node Heights Tree A (AVL) Tree B (AVL) height=2 BF=1-0=1 2 6 6 1 0 1 1 4 9 4 9 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 1 5 8 height of node = h balance factor = hleft-hright empty height = -1
Node Heights after Insert 7 Tree A (AVL) Tree B (not AVL) balance factor 1-(-1) = 2 2 3 6 6 1 1 1 2 4 9 4 9 -1 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 1 5 1 5 8 0 7 height of node = h balance factor = hleft-hright empty height = -1
Insert and Rotation in AVL Trees • Insert operation may cause balance factor to become 2 or –2 for some node • only nodes on the path from insertion point to root node have possibly changed in height • So after the Insert, go back up to the root node by node, updating heights • If a new balance factor (the difference hleft-hright) is 2 or –2, adjust tree by rotationaround the node
Single Rotation in an AVL Tree 2 2 6 6 1 2 1 1 4 9 4 8 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 7 9 1 5 8 1 5 0 7
AVL Insertion: Outside Case j Consider a valid AVL subtree k h Z h h X Y
AVL Insertion: Outside Case j Inserting into X destroys the AVL property at node j k h Z h+1 h Y X
AVL Insertion: Outside Case j Do a “right rotation” k h Z h+1 h Y X
Single right rotation j Do a “right rotation” k h Z h+1 h Y X
Outside Case Completed “Right rotation” done! (“Left rotation” is mirror symmetric) k j h+1 h h X Z Y AVL property has been restored!
AVL Insertion: Inside Case j Consider a valid AVL subtree k h Z h h X Y
AVL Insertion: Inside Case j Inserting into Y destroys the AVL property at node j Does “right rotation” restore balance? k h Z h h+1 X Y
AVL Insertion: Inside Case k “Right rotation” does not restore balance… now k is out of balance j h X h h+1 Z Y
AVL Insertion: Inside Case j Consider the structure of subtree Y… k h Z h h+1 X Y
AVL Insertion: Inside Case j Y = node i and subtrees V and W k h Z i h h+1 X h or h-1 W V
AVL Insertion: Inside Case j We will do a left-right “double rotation” . . . k Z i X W V
Double rotation : first rotation j left rotation complete i Z k W V X
Double rotation : second rotation j Now do a right rotation i Z k W V X
Double rotation : second rotation right rotation complete Balance has been restored i j k h h h or h-1 V Z W X
Implementation balance (1,0,-1) key left right No need to keep the height; just the difference in height, i.e. the balance factor; this has to be modified on the path of insertion even if you don’t perform rotations Once you have performed a rotation (single or double) you won’t need to go back up the tree