E N D
2. California Doctrine of Primary Assumption of Risk and
Its Application in Recreational Marine Cases
3. Presented byMarker Lovell
4. Primary Assumption of the Risk Duty Question- A person has no duty to protect others from the inherent risk of an activity. A risk is inherent if can be prohibited without discouraging vigorous participation in an activity.
Knight v. Jewett
Touch Football
3 Cal 4th 296 (1992)
Ford v. Gouin
Barefoot Waterskiing
3 Cal 4th 339 (1992)
5. Secondary Assumption of Risk Comparative Fault/Comparative Negligence
6. Types of Recreational Marine Activities To Which it Can Apply
7. TEST FOR ACTIVITIES THAT QUALIFY Sporting Activities done for enjoyment or thrill, requires physical exertion as well as elements of skill and involves the chance of personal injury.
8. WATERSKIING
9. WAKEBOARDING
10. PWC Riding
11. SPORTFISHING
12. SAILBOAT RACING
13. BOATING
14. Expansion of Doctrine to Other Activities Beniati v. Black Rock City , LLC, 175 Cal. App. 4th 650 (2009) (Burning Man)
15. CO-PARTICIPANTS Liable only for Intentional / Reckless Conduct. Not Ordinary Negligence
16. COMMERCIAL OPERATORS Duty Not to Increase Inherent Risks of The Activity
17. Where could it be applied?
18. FISHING CHARTER
19. RENTAL FACILITY
20. HOUSEBOAT RENTAL
21. MARINA
22. COMMERCIAL OPERATORS (continued) Equipment Malfunction/ Defective Equipment Distinguished
23. Procedural Issues Summary Judgment
Expert Testimony
Used to determine nature of activity
No need for an expert on topics of common knowledge
24. Statutory Violations Violation California Harbors & Navigation Code
25. Jurisdictional Issues No Primary Assumption of Risk in Maritime Law
California Cases (Navigable Waters)
Federal Cases