340 likes | 360 Views
This article discusses the important responsibilities of an economist in water resource programs, including watershed protection, flood prevention, and planning. The economist plays a crucial role in ensuring compliance with regulations, evaluating economic data, and contributing to project reports and economic analyses.
E N D
The Economists Role:Water Resource Programs Watershed Protection & Flood Prevention Watershed Planning Watershed Operations Watershed Rehabilitation Emergency Watershed Protection
Economist Role: Water Resources • Fully integrated participant in all state watershed planning and operations activities • Principal member of the interdisciplinary team for all watershed projects • Responsible for quality and defensibility of all watershed project economic data, evaluation and analysis
Economist Role: Water Resources • Assures compliance with all economic aspects of statutes, Executive Orders and codified rules including applicable state and local regulations. • Assures compliance with US Water Resources Council, Economic and Environmental Principles and Guidelines…. • Assure compliance with Department and NRCS policies regarding economic evaluations (NWSM, GM, etc)
Economist Role: Water Resources • Develops/contributes economic sections of project reports, including tables and graphics: • preliminary investigation reports • floodplain management studies • watershed plans • investigation and analysis reports • environmental assessments • environmental impact statements
Economist Role: Water Resources • Full participant in project related public participation activities • Keeps current on water resource issues and policies and economic procedures • In several states, also responsible for all social science aspects of watershed planning.
Economist Role:Watershed Surveys and Planning • Assists with Plan of Work development • Develops economic present and future condition • Assists in determining project period of analysis • Quantifies economic problems and opportunities • Assists with formulation of alternatives
Economist Role:Watershed Surveys and Planning • Quantifies economic effects of alternatives, including: • Cumulative Effects • National Economic Development account • Regional Economic Development account. • Assists with public participation and interagency coordination
Economist Role:Watershed Surveys and Planning • Evaluates socio-economic considerations • Develops economic sections of watershed documents • Assists in the development of the Watershed Surveys and Planning database
Economist Role:Watershed Operations • Assists in development of conservation practice average costs • Assists with economic aspects of all supplemental and revised plans • Assists with develop and maintenance of Future Obligations and Watersheds Benefits databases
Economist Role:Watershed Operations • Conducts economic evaluations to reaffirm project feasibility • Develops revised economic tables for Completion Reports • Provides economic inputs for remedial work, “additional work,” rehabilitation and decommissioning activity
Watershed Program:Eligible Purposes • Flood Control • Agricultural Water Management • Water Supply • Water Conservation • Fish and Wildlife Development • Public Recreation • Groundwater Recharge • Animal Waste Management • Watershed Protection
USDA Watershed Program NRCS has assisted communities address natural resource needs in 2000 Watershed Projects since 1948
Watershed Program Monetary Benefits - 2000Nation - $ 2 Billion Millions
Watershed Program Congressional Appropriations 1976 includes transition quarter 1995 deficit reduction (downsizing) 1983 includes $100 million jobs bill 2000 $7.8 million rescission of FA
Watershed Program(PL-566 & PL-534) • The unfunded federal commitment for the Watershed Program is approximately $ 1.4billion dollars (not including Rehab)
Watershed Program Unfunded Federal Commitment by State (PL-566)(States larger than $5 million Shown)
Watershed Rehab:FY 2002 Allocations • $10 million “...priority be given only to those structures which pose the highest risk to life and property” • 80 sponsor applications received & ranked $10.9 million; 17 states 42 projects involved potential for loss of life
Watershed Rehab:FY 2002 Projects • 43 projects funded • $7.9 million ($4.6 mil. TA; $3.3 mil. FA) • 17 states • FY 2002 deliverables: • 30 rehabilitation plans initiated (17 states) • 10 rehabilitation plans completed (7 states) • 11 rehabilitation designs completed (5 states) • 8 rehabilitation projects implemented (4 states) (Tab 3)
Rehab Projects To Date No. Dams OK (Pilot) FY 1998 2 NM, MS, OH, WI (Pilots) FY 2000 15 FY2001 19 FY 2002 43 Total 79 Only 10,853 to go !!!
Rehab Future Funding FY 2002 Farm Bill (millions) CCC Discretionary FundingAuthorityTotal FY 02 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 FY 03 45 45 90 FY 04 50 55 105 FY 05 55 65 120 FY 06 60 75 135 FY 0765 85 150 Total 275 325 600
Rehab FY 2003 Funding? • House: $45 million mandatory • Senate: $30 million discretionary • Final: ??? Conference Committee ??? CR?? How Long??
Watershed Rehab Planning • Public input • Use NRCS planning process and P & G procedures (to detail appropriate for project) • NEPA process • Cultural resources • Historic preservation • Threatened and endangered species • Tribal consultation compliance
Watershed Rehab Planning • Evaluate alternatives: • No action • Decommissioning (removal) • Rehabilitate to current criteria • NED alternative • Non-structural (optional) • Relocation • Flood proofing • Easements/controls on downstream development
Watershed Rehab Planning • Economists role is critical as a member of an interdisciplinary planning team • Engineers, biologists, planners, and other specialists must provide the economists with the basic data before an economic analysis can be completed
Rehab: Other Activities • Web pages • Watershed Operations & Rehabilitation (under “Programs” tab on NRCS webpage) • Rehab Program Leaders Documents • Rehabilitation of Aging Dams (CD Training) • 2000 CD’s distributed
Watershed Program:Other Activities • O&M Manual Revision • Finalize by November, 2002 • National Watershed Manual Revision • Next draft by first of 2003 • National Watershed Coalition Web Page • www.watershedcoalition.org
EMERGENCY WATERSHED PROTECTION PROGRAM • Economics: integral part of EWP • Planning considerations • Economic Defensibility • Damage Survey Reports
EMERGENCY WATERSHED PROTECTION PROGRAM Damage Survey Report • Summarizes the planning considerations for economic, social, and environmental evaluations • Documents the site assessment and evaluation decisions • One DSR for each EWP treatment site Approach to complete DSR’s should be interdisciplinary, including an Economist
Discussion/Questions? Bruce A. Julian National Policy Coordinator—Water Resources 202.720.3042 bruce.julian@usda.gov